OT- 100m spoiler
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Fatima Whitbread went to the Doctors, complaining of Hairs on her chest. The Doctor asked how far did they go down, Her reply all the way to my Bollocks 
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Scrap wrote:Fatima Whitbread went to the Doctors, complaining of Hairs on her chest. The Doctor asked how far did they go down, Her reply all the way to my Bollocks
I used to be a sprinter at an athletics club before i moved to London but i've always enjoyed track and field in a similar way to boxing. I had a discussion about this on some other site once. There is an elemental fascination in 'pure' sports which can't be matched by others where equipment is involved. So being the best in weightlifting, running, jumping, swimming and fighting just means more.
When the apocalypse comes and we're back to a caveman existence Phil Taylor's way with the arrows or Tiger Woods ability to chip onto the green aren't going to help them one bit.
Last edited by Shirow on 19 Aug 2008, 07:45, edited 2 times in total.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45233
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Wasn't she married to a guy who was convicted of supplying performance enhancing drugs.Twinkle Toes wrote:Regarding Flo-Jo, I was reading that the wind meter showed zero for the 100m race, but only thirty feet away at the long jump, and at the same time the reading was 4.7.
However, the mark was submitted and ratified.
I think she eventually ended up owning something like 6 or 7 of the womens fastest 100m times.
She was never proven a cheat, and was tested numerous times during 1988, and even went on record inviting to be tested at any time.
Maybe she was just ahead of the game when it came to drug testing.
Like Johnson, Flo Jo went from a finalist in races, to beating people by 7-8 meters, it was ridiculously obvious she was done up to the nines with steroids.
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
If steroids are capable of improving a sprinters performance to the degree you're talking about then how comes old Dwain Chambers couldn't run faster times than he was doing as a teenager?
Not being facetious btw
Not being facetious btw
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
And why cant we have an alternative olympics where a blind eye is turned... I'd tune in.
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
His scientist wasnt much cop ![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Wales, you have more chance going faster blind. Of all the senses Eyesight slows you down.
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Im sure theres a world record set by a blind guy, he went something like 140mph on a quad bike down a track.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45233
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Yeah, but he thought he was sitting on a stool at the time, he wasn't even attempting the record.Wales wrote:Im sure theres a world record set by a blind guy, he went something like 140mph on a quad bike down a track.
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
He was actually deaf and blind... amazing really.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/camb ... 565386.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/camb ... 565386.stm
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
flo jo tends to get forgotten nowadays.Carbo wrote:No-no, Flo-Jo wasn't clean. Clearly. But, if you think about it, even other doped atheletes never came close. People talk about Ben Johnson's Seoul 100 as being startling, like something from a different century, but I believe Flo-Jo's was even more so.Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:If Flo Jo was clean, then I'll beat Bolt next week.
And her 10.49 was windy. It was set at the Yankee trials where it was windy as you like but her run registered as zero wind. Something went wrong.
I mean, with all the advances in training, nutrition knowledge, harder tracks, better clothing, and better drugs, they still can't get within a 10th of a second -- a big distance in sprinting.
but like johnson she was running amazing times.
to think the only woman sprinter in the last 20 yrs to get near those times are marion jones.
and she was a cheat.
her world record of 10.49 still stands and her olympic record of 10.54.
those middle distance records in the women's still stand as well.
marita koch and that other woman with the long name holds em from the mid 80's.
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Yes that's exactly it. You could hear a pin drop before some of these Olympic track finals. So many pairs of eyes watching an individual about to try and perform at their best. That is serious pressure on one pair of shoulders.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think, like boxing, track and field is for the most part an individual and purist form of sport, a man against the track and his opponents, toiling against the pain of the mind and of the body to overcome distance and time against his fellow man, so really not that dissimilar to the discipline required of boxers. Both are exceptionally brutal and demanding in their own way.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13285
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Bolt getting ready for another 200m jog in the semis, coming up..
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
It makes you realise how good Jesse Owens times were. It took 28 years for it to be broken at altitute some feat.
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
I was actually equalled 6years later and broken in Berlin 20years later. Sounds impressive but Owens only knocked .1 off a secon off the old record and there was a little matter of a world war going on and the fact you needed to break the record then by a whole .1 of a second, now you can shave .01 off the record to break it.Scrap wrote:It makes you realise how good Jesse Owens times were. It took 28 years for it to be broken at altitute some feat.
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Owens Broke it in Berlin ?
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
That was an Olympic Rcord in 36 and as I understood it stood till Mexico 68 32 years Im only going on memory.
-
funso banjo baby
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4417
- Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Scrap wrote:Owens Broke it in Berlin ?
im faster than them
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Yes they are one Hour behind us ![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Nope broke in '56 (in Berlin too), equalled im '41 or '42, now his long jump is more impressive as it stood for 25yearsScrap wrote:That was an Olympic Rcord in 36 and as I understood it stood till Mexico 68 32 years Im only going on memory.
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Olympics were in Berlin 56 ?
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
They were in Melbourne. One of those trivia questions is where was the equestrian event held in the '56 Olympics?Scrap wrote:Olympics were in Berlin 56 ?
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Was that the one where they held them in Scandinavia because of quarantine laws?
Re: OT- 100m spoiler
Yeah, Stockholm I think.Captain Hook wrote:Was that the one where they held them in Scandinavia because of quarantine laws?