I was just saying I was glad he won and that hes a nice fella. Anyway what about those who say 'Im glad he lost hes a bigheaded twat' etc dont you think they're putting too much stall on their table manners?Captain Hook wrote:He is a nice bloke Emma, but you put far too much stall on how they look and their table manners.
If being polite and nice was all that mattered Richie Woodhall would have been in the p4p top 10![]()
It was a poor performance against a piss poor opponent and I'd steer clear of Pryce/Small and co on that showing. Any thoughts on the performance twentysix? Disappointed, or was he just not at the races?
Ryan Rhodes V Jamie Coyle
Re: Ryan Rhodes V Jamie Coyle
-
big lennox
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2550
- Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44
Re: Ryan Rhodes V Jamie Coyle
I look at the fight as being very useful for ryan -getting a good 12 rounds in is always helpful, as you can go back and watch what was good and not so good about your performance and make the appropriate adjustments; this coupled with another fight lined up for November is just what the doctor ordered.I bet you will see a far sharper performance then, as well.Regular fights fro ryan is what he needs as he gets sharper and sharper, so I think 12 solid rounds was a good thing.
Lastly, a 100% respect to his opponent.He took a licking and was so so brave -he can be extremely proud of himself.
Lastly, a 100% respect to his opponent.He took a licking and was so so brave -he can be extremely proud of himself.
Re: Ryan Rhodes V Jamie Coyle
Yes, he looked like a loser from the start. He had little chance of winning - Ryan is just better, that's all.caffrey wrote:i dont think it was an inspired performance by coyle at all.Taking his kids to disney land or whatever is cute and all but he looked like a loser from the start.
But the fact he had the courage to last 12 rounds was inspired. Absolutely no question.
-
Dirk Kelly
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4971
- Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13
Re: Ryan Rhodes V Jamie Coyle
I viewed the fight a little like Moore vs. Facey. Coyle was an awkward, rugged opponent that refused to wilt or quit. Ryan who has had trouble with these opponents before didn't panick or try too hard to get him out of there so in that respect he fought the perfect fight - why risk chucking everything and the kitchen sink at Coyle and risk running out of steam and being stopped or being tagged with a good shot late on.
This is Rhodes last run so why take risks?
I think everyone has opponents that they struggle with and this could well be Ryan's. I'd bet on him to up his game if Small or Pryce came. I'd pick him to beat Small but would be hard to call against Pryce - thats a fight I'd love to see!
This is Rhodes last run so why take risks?
I think everyone has opponents that they struggle with and this could well be Ryan's. I'd bet on him to up his game if Small or Pryce came. I'd pick him to beat Small but would be hard to call against Pryce - thats a fight I'd love to see!
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Ryan Rhodes V Jamie Coyle
Why, who said that?emma wrote:I was just saying I was glad he won and that hes a nice fella. Anyway what about those who say 'Im glad he lost hes a bigheaded twat' etc dont you think they're putting too much stall on their table manners?Captain Hook wrote:He is a nice bloke Emma, but you put far too much stall on how they look and their table manners.
If being polite and nice was all that mattered Richie Woodhall would have been in the p4p top 10![]()
It was a poor performance against a piss poor opponent and I'd steer clear of Pryce/Small and co on that showing. Any thoughts on the performance twentysix? Disappointed, or was he just not at the races?
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Ryan Rhodes V Jamie Coyle
Dirk - agreed. Rhodes looked a little ponderous at times in my opinion but like several have said, this is his last throw of the dice and he can't afford to take any risks.
He would beat Small and lose to Pryce and Moore. Earlier in his career he'd have beaten Pryce and given Moore a tough time - that would have been a good fight.
But Coyle, while brave and admirable, should have been out of there earlier. Surviving for 12 rounds doesn't impress me. If anything it concerns me.
We shouldn't put too much emphasis on bravery, it's got a lot of guys hurt.
But Rhodes did his job and will move on. I wonder who's next? Small, hopefully.....
He would beat Small and lose to Pryce and Moore. Earlier in his career he'd have beaten Pryce and given Moore a tough time - that would have been a good fight.
But Coyle, while brave and admirable, should have been out of there earlier. Surviving for 12 rounds doesn't impress me. If anything it concerns me.
We shouldn't put too much emphasis on bravery, it's got a lot of guys hurt.
But Rhodes did his job and will move on. I wonder who's next? Small, hopefully.....
-
Pugilist-specialist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37
Re: Ryan Rhodes V Jamie Coyle
twenty-six
Patrick Maxwell was scheduled to box.
Any idea what happened to that bout ?

Patrick Maxwell was scheduled to box.
Any idea what happened to that bout ?
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
Re: Ryan Rhodes V Jamie Coyle
rhodes fought an aggressive fight.Dirk Kelly wrote:I viewed the fight a little like Moore vs. Facey. Coyle was an awkward, rugged opponent that refused to wilt or quit. Ryan who has had trouble with these opponents before didn't panick or try too hard to get him out of there so in that respect he fought the perfect fight - why risk chucking everything and the kitchen sink at Coyle and risk running out of steam and being stopped or being tagged with a good shot late on.
This is Rhodes last run so why take risks?
I think everyone has opponents that they struggle with and this could well be Ryan's. I'd bet on him to up his game if Small or Pryce came. I'd pick him to beat Small but would be hard to call against Pryce - thats a fight I'd love to see!
except for rd 12 when he went on a little jog around the ring.
my only problem with him fighting that way is when he steps up in class.
his chin has always been a worry and he's still too open to punches.
he needs to fight a bit more defensive in my opinion.
otherwise better fighters would put him away. :(
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Ryan Rhodes V Jamie Coyle
Pugilist,
Pat is ill at the moment.
He's on a course of anti biotics so didn't fight.
All perfectly genuine.
Pat is ill at the moment.
He's on a course of anti biotics so didn't fight.
All perfectly genuine.
-
Pugilist-specialist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37
Re: Ryan Rhodes V Jamie Coyle
Thankstwenty six wrote:Pugilist,
Pat is ill at the moment.
He's on a course of anti biotics so didn't fight.
All perfectly genuine.