Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post Reply
Gray-Fox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1138
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 19:33

Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by Gray-Fox »

Am I right on this one:

http://www.willhill.com/iibs/EN/buildco ... =BX2203846

That if I bet 100 quid on Pavlik and he wins I get 440 back?
BigEars
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 997
Joined: 16 Jan 2006, 14:23

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by BigEars »

No, if you bet 100 on Pavlik you get 136.36 back or a profit of just £36.36
Gray-Fox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1138
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 19:33

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by Gray-Fox »

Ok thanks.
Dirk Kelly
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4971
Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by Dirk Kelly »

I've got a £1 on a ko for Pavlik in every round. Come on Kelly.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by Hagler2002 »

I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.

What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
Dirk Kelly
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4971
Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by Dirk Kelly »

Hagler2002 wrote:I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.

What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
Who did you get that with? I always try and ensure that bet on both fighters to get at least my money back, William Hill had Hopkins at 2/1 so didn't think it was worth it, more the fool me!
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by Hagler2002 »

Dirk Kelly wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.

What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
Who did you get that with? I always try and ensure that bet on both fighters to get at least my money back, William Hill had Hopkins at 2/1 so didn't think it was worth it, more the fool me!
Got it on Betfair, he even went a shade bigger than 4/1 just before the off.
Dirk Kelly
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4971
Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by Dirk Kelly »

Hagler2002 wrote:
Dirk Kelly wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.

What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
Who did you get that with? I always try and ensure that bet on both fighters to get at least my money back, William Hill had Hopkins at 2/1 so didn't think it was worth it, more the fool me!
Got it on Betfair, he even went a shade bigger than 4/1 just before the off.
Is Betfair the one where normal people post odds and people can post their bets with them? Do you always get your money back?
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by Poncey »

Yeah, I checked on a betting comparison site and the best they had was 5/2 and 11/4.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by Hagler2002 »

The best who had?
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by Poncey »

betfinder
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by Hagler2002 »

I didn't exactly back Hopkins the book was running at 112% and I laid Pavlik @1.27 which also meant I got the draw so theoretically I did back Hopkins at 4/1.

If you backed him outright on Betfair it was a shade over 3/1 so the way to do it was lay Pavlik as the book was not at 100%
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by DavidPayne »

I've got a Betfair account, free with Telegraph Fantasy Football.

And haven't got a scooby doo what to do with their odds setting.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by Poncey »

Me neither. I have absolutely no idea what Hagler is saying in His post. He could be speaking Georgian and it would make as much sense.

I really know nothing about gambling, except the number before the dash should be bigger than the number after to make it attractive. :oops:
toppity
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2802
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 22:03

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Post by toppity »

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Me neither. I have absolutely no idea what Hagler is saying in His post. He could be speaking Georgian and it would make as much sense.

I really know nothing about gambling, except the number before the dash should be bigger than the number after to make it attractive. :oops:
what makes you any different from those that do gamble :P
Post Reply