Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Am I right on this one:
http://www.willhill.com/iibs/EN/buildco ... =BX2203846
That if I bet 100 quid on Pavlik and he wins I get 440 back?
http://www.willhill.com/iibs/EN/buildco ... =BX2203846
That if I bet 100 quid on Pavlik and he wins I get 440 back?
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
No, if you bet 100 on Pavlik you get 136.36 back or a profit of just £36.36
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Ok thanks.
-
Dirk Kelly
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4971
- Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
I've got a £1 on a ko for Pavlik in every round. Come on Kelly.
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.
What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
-
Dirk Kelly
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4971
- Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Who did you get that with? I always try and ensure that bet on both fighters to get at least my money back, William Hill had Hopkins at 2/1 so didn't think it was worth it, more the fool me!Hagler2002 wrote:I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.
What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Got it on Betfair, he even went a shade bigger than 4/1 just before the off.Dirk Kelly wrote:Who did you get that with? I always try and ensure that bet on both fighters to get at least my money back, William Hill had Hopkins at 2/1 so didn't think it was worth it, more the fool me!Hagler2002 wrote:I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.
What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
-
Dirk Kelly
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4971
- Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Is Betfair the one where normal people post odds and people can post their bets with them? Do you always get your money back?Hagler2002 wrote:Got it on Betfair, he even went a shade bigger than 4/1 just before the off.Dirk Kelly wrote:Who did you get that with? I always try and ensure that bet on both fighters to get at least my money back, William Hill had Hopkins at 2/1 so didn't think it was worth it, more the fool me!Hagler2002 wrote:I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.
What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Yeah, I checked on a betting comparison site and the best they had was 5/2 and 11/4.
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
The best who had?
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
betfinder
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
I didn't exactly back Hopkins the book was running at 112% and I laid Pavlik @1.27 which also meant I got the draw so theoretically I did back Hopkins at 4/1.
If you backed him outright on Betfair it was a shade over 3/1 so the way to do it was lay Pavlik as the book was not at 100%
If you backed him outright on Betfair it was a shade over 3/1 so the way to do it was lay Pavlik as the book was not at 100%
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
I've got a Betfair account, free with Telegraph Fantasy Football.
And haven't got a scooby doo what to do with their odds setting.
And haven't got a scooby doo what to do with their odds setting.
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Me neither. I have absolutely no idea what Hagler is saying in His post. He could be speaking Georgian and it would make as much sense.
I really know nothing about gambling, except the number before the dash should be bigger than the number after to make it attractive.
I really know nothing about gambling, except the number before the dash should be bigger than the number after to make it attractive.
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
what makes you any different from those that do gamble :PEmerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Me neither. I have absolutely no idea what Hagler is saying in His post. He could be speaking Georgian and it would make as much sense.
I really know nothing about gambling, except the number before the dash should be bigger than the number after to make it attractive.