stujones wrote:I really don't think you can call a 6 time world champion only very good. Lets not forget, 18 months ago - he was beating a great, possibly the greatest of this generation, untill his 34 year old legs caught up with him in the last 3 rounds... but still - a fair few had him winning.Autobarn wrote:Lots of angles for this fight & the result. Oscar's weight, age and so on.
Here's another. Pac is one of the great ones, and beat a fighter who even at his best was "merely" very good.
If you remember I asked the question before and after the Mayweather contest - who would win 1997 DLH at 140, or 2007 Mayweather at 140... more people changed their mind after the contest, plumping for DLH.
It could be argued that Hopkins and Pacquiao are the only two fighters to have beaten him, that he hasn't avenged. With the fighters he has faced- you cannot say that a "very good" fighter could manage that.
If Calzaghe is going down as a "great" then DLH is a great.
Name the PRIME fighters he fought to get his BELTS!
Chavez was past it.
Whittaker was past his best and STILL won, imo.
Sturm??
Have a look and see who he COULD have fought in his career.
He got the opportunities becaus he SELLS tickets.
He is basically a better version of Hatton in that respect.
He gts world title shots ALL the time because he brings money.
Would be good to see him work his way into contention but he has never had to.