Steve Bunce.

Post Reply
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Steve Bunce.

Post by KOJOE90 »

It wasn't too bad untill the last three paragraphs.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3752807.stm

Very very premature to say the least.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

Whats he on for christs sake!!... gives me a headache reading his articles!.... 8) :cry: :roll:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

Sometimes he can be premature - Remember when he said Froch was already somewhere around the 8th or 9th ranked Super Middle, way to early.
Matchfixer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1117
Joined: 24 Jan 2004, 11:27

Re: Steve Bunce.

Post by Matchfixer »

KOJOE90 wrote:It wasn't too bad untill the last three paragraphs.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3752807.stm

Very very premature to say the least.
How's it premature? You think they need to win gold first?
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Re: Steve Bunce.

Post by KOJOE90 »

Matchfixer wrote:
KOJOE90 wrote:It wasn't too bad untill the last three paragraphs.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3752807.stm

Very very premature to say the least.
How's it premature? You think they need to win gold first?
Not at all mate, but their not even Pro yet and his suggesting they are candidtates for Pro P4P listings in the future.

There's a LOOOOONNNG way to go yet before you can start thinking in that way about a fighter. Let them develop as a Pro first before judging them that highly that's all I'm saying.
Matchfixer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1117
Joined: 24 Jan 2004, 11:27

Re: Steve Bunce.

Post by Matchfixer »

KOJOE90 wrote:
Matchfixer wrote:
KOJOE90 wrote:It wasn't too bad untill the last three paragraphs.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3752807.stm

Very very premature to say the least.
How's it premature? You think they need to win gold first?
Not at all mate, but their not even Pro yet and his suggesting they are candidtates for Pro P4P listings in the future.

There's a LOOOOONNNG way to go yet before you can start thinking in that way about a fighter. Let them develop as a Pro first before judging them that highly that's all I'm saying.
Kindelan's Cuban and pushing 30 I think... I don't think he'll be turning pro.

I think Bunce's suggestion was that amateurs can be included in P4P lists whether they turn pro or not. I think it's an interesting point.
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Re: Steve Bunce.

Post by KOJOE90 »

Matchfixer wrote:
KOJOE90 wrote:
Matchfixer wrote: How's it premature? You think they need to win gold first?
Not at all mate, but their not even Pro yet and his suggesting they are candidtates for Pro P4P listings in the future.

There's a LOOOOONNNG way to go yet before you can start thinking in that way about a fighter. Let them develop as a Pro first before judging them that highly that's all I'm saying.
Kindelan's Cuban and pushing 30 I think... I don't think he'll be turning pro.

I think Bunce's suggestion was that amateurs can be included in P4P lists whether they turn pro or not. I think it's an interesting point.
Fair point.

I don't think however you can directly compare Amatuers and Pro's with regard to P4P listings the two sports have too many differences these days.

I suppose you could on just natrual talent and ability but that would be very difficult as we are not really comparing like with like?
Hardhitters11
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 942
Joined: 02 Sep 2003, 13:20

Post by Hardhitters11 »

Bunces usual rubbish I avoid anything by him to be honest.
Post Reply