It wasn't too bad untill the last three paragraphs.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3752807.stm
Very very premature to say the least.
Steve Bunce.
-
Matchfixer
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1117
- Joined: 24 Jan 2004, 11:27
Re: Steve Bunce.
How's it premature? You think they need to win gold first?KOJOE90 wrote:It wasn't too bad untill the last three paragraphs.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3752807.stm
Very very premature to say the least.
Re: Steve Bunce.
Not at all mate, but their not even Pro yet and his suggesting they are candidtates for Pro P4P listings in the future.Matchfixer wrote:How's it premature? You think they need to win gold first?KOJOE90 wrote:It wasn't too bad untill the last three paragraphs.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3752807.stm
Very very premature to say the least.
There's a LOOOOONNNG way to go yet before you can start thinking in that way about a fighter. Let them develop as a Pro first before judging them that highly that's all I'm saying.
-
Matchfixer
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1117
- Joined: 24 Jan 2004, 11:27
Re: Steve Bunce.
Kindelan's Cuban and pushing 30 I think... I don't think he'll be turning pro.KOJOE90 wrote:Not at all mate, but their not even Pro yet and his suggesting they are candidtates for Pro P4P listings in the future.Matchfixer wrote:How's it premature? You think they need to win gold first?KOJOE90 wrote:It wasn't too bad untill the last three paragraphs.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3752807.stm
Very very premature to say the least.
There's a LOOOOONNNG way to go yet before you can start thinking in that way about a fighter. Let them develop as a Pro first before judging them that highly that's all I'm saying.
I think Bunce's suggestion was that amateurs can be included in P4P lists whether they turn pro or not. I think it's an interesting point.
Re: Steve Bunce.
Fair point.Matchfixer wrote:Kindelan's Cuban and pushing 30 I think... I don't think he'll be turning pro.KOJOE90 wrote:Not at all mate, but their not even Pro yet and his suggesting they are candidtates for Pro P4P listings in the future.Matchfixer wrote: How's it premature? You think they need to win gold first?
There's a LOOOOONNNG way to go yet before you can start thinking in that way about a fighter. Let them develop as a Pro first before judging them that highly that's all I'm saying.
I think Bunce's suggestion was that amateurs can be included in P4P lists whether they turn pro or not. I think it's an interesting point.
I don't think however you can directly compare Amatuers and Pro's with regard to P4P listings the two sports have too many differences these days.
I suppose you could on just natrual talent and ability but that would be very difficult as we are not really comparing like with like?
-
Hardhitters11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 942
- Joined: 02 Sep 2003, 13:20