I read that David argued with Tony Dodson. Any footage of that ? Or can someone enlighten us ?twenty six wrote: Steve 689 - the guy behind Small certainly wasn't one of his backslappers.
That's Paul David.
Thanks
I read that David argued with Tony Dodson. Any footage of that ? Or can someone enlighten us ?twenty six wrote: Steve 689 - the guy behind Small certainly wasn't one of his backslappers.
That's Paul David.
I think Booth is just working with David Haye now North Cyprus.rhino222 wrote:is there bitterness between adam booth and small.....or did their former 'relationship' help secure this fight? ... and why did they part company?
F**k me you're right, I watched it again and realised after first thinking it was that Fearon fella. My apologies on that one. I've met Paul and he's a nice fellatwenty six wrote:Steve 689 - the guy behind Small certainly wasn't one of his backslappers.
That's Paul David.
He thought the same as everyone else.
What vs Glen Johnson?twenty six wrote: Did you know in a part of the Conference not shown, Small likened himself to Roy Jones Jnr ???
I am almost certain he iswhicker wrote:I think Booth is just working with David Haye now North Cyprus.rhino222 wrote:is there bitterness between adam booth and small.....or did their former 'relationship' help secure this fight? ... and why did they part company?
E wrote:
Well, well... that just proves his lack of intelligence. How anyone in this day with one quarter of an inch of brain in this day can convert to this inhumane, primitive, contradictory cult is beyond me.
Small looks ridiculous in his suit with that sheet wrapped round his head and inserting Arabic into every other word he says....just pathetic
Bit tetchy there 26. It's perfectly valid to point out that persuading people to part with their cash is more difficult in a recession.twenty six wrote: Since when has the entertainment industry had an obligation to the tough financial situation ?
This may come as a shock to you Whicker, but the cost of geting this show off the ground isn't peanuts and guess what ?
The Promotion Company isn't a Charity - a profit has to be made.
Yes, but you don't make a profit by charging prices people are unable to afford- that was my original point.twenty six wrote: Since when has the entertainment industry had an obligation to the tough financial situation ?
This may come as a shock to you Whicker, but the cost of geting this show off the ground isn't peanuts and guess what ?
The Promotion Company isn't a Charity - a profit has to be made.