This Friday Fight Night

Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28495
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by Coco »

metropol wrote:I'm interested to see how Francis gets on

It's another dreadful card but Francis v Vegas should be entertaining, Vegas always comes to fight but I have a feeling Dean will get to him early, i'm still to be convinced about Cleverly
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by dondada »

THEBUTCH wrote:Should I have said "in my opinion" ? I don't want to get Boxrec in bother.
Nah, it's just that I'M sick of the hassle! (which is their intention, of course - oops, allegedly!...by the way, saying allegedly means feck all).
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by DG. »

mark thompson wrote:
DG. wrote:Mark Thomson..

Learn how to use the quote function.

MT(empty) by name ( your initials) and by nature! :lol:

More would watch Hatton Vs Witter than Hatton Vs anyone else. FACT.

Back on topic....SN serve up shiit!


:D
That's Thompson with a P, how is that a fact, maybe in Britain they would but worldwide Hatton v Pacman will have more than double the figures that Hatton v Twitter would do FACT .

Hatton left SN because he was sick of the opposition he was facing. If you were on these boards years ago you would know how much stick Fwank and Hatton received for his WBU reign and when Hatton called himself a World Champion while holding the WBU Belt!

:lol:
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28495
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by Coco »

Hatton left SN because he knew he was big box office after the Tzysu fight and wanted to cut FW out of the financial equation.
And a Pacman bout will have a far greater worldwide audience, and a much bigger revenue draw than Witter
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by DG. »

Coco wrote:Hatton left SN because he knew he was big box office after the Tzysu fight and wanted to cut FW out of the financial equation.
And a Pacman bout will have a far greater worldwide audience, and a much bigger revenue draw than Witter

Thompson has taken my quote the wrong way. He mentioned no one watching Hatton Vs Witter. What I should have said was HATTON vs WITTER was bigger than anything nelse out there for Hatton when he was being to shreds on these boards for fighting nobodies.

ALSO - I agree in parts to what you say about Hatton and the BOX OFFICE - but remember Hatton threatened to leave unless he got KT and he knew after KT if Fwank had his way it would have been mismatch after mismatch at the MEN so Fwank could get back what he had to pay KT.

ALSO - if you were to fight Pacman it would also have more viewers than anythig else because PACMAN fights are shown to the whole of his country.

The USA are not turning out for Hatton -acman is the draw.

:D
Last edited by DG. on 11 Feb 2009, 13:09, edited 1 time in total.
mark thompson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 662
Joined: 05 Sep 2008, 05:13

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by mark thompson »

DG. wrote:
Coco wrote:Hatton left SN because he knew he was big box office after the Tzysu fight and wanted to cut FW out of the financial equation.
And a Pacman bout will have a far greater worldwide audience, and a much bigger revenue draw than Witter

Thompson has taken my quote the wrong way. He mentioned no one watching Hatton Vs Witter. What I should have said was HATTON vs WITTER was bigger than anything nelse out there for Hatton when he was being to shreds on these boards for fighting nobodies.

ALSO - I agree in parts to what you say about Hatton and the BOX OFFICE - but remember Hatton threatened to leave unless he got KT and he knew after KT if Fwank had his way it would have been mismatch after mismatch at the MEN so Fwank could get back what he had to pay KT.


:D

How did i take your quote the wrong way its in black and white a few posts up :o
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by DG. »

mark thompson wrote:
DG. wrote:
Coco wrote:Hatton left SN because he knew he was big box office after the Tzysu fight and wanted to cut FW out of the financial equation.
And a Pacman bout will have a far greater worldwide audience, and a much bigger revenue draw than Witter

Thompson has taken my quote the wrong way. He mentioned no one watching Hatton Vs Witter. What I should have said was HATTON vs WITTER was bigger than anything nelse out there for Hatton when he was being to shreds on these boards for fighting nobodies.

ALSO - I agree in parts to what you say about Hatton and the BOX OFFICE - but remember Hatton threatened to leave unless he got KT and he knew after KT if Fwank had his way it would have been mismatch after mismatch at the MEN so Fwank could get back what he had to pay KT.


:D

How did i take your quote the wrong way its in black and white a few posts up :o


Because I mentioned Hatton being a laughing stock BACK THEN and the reason(s)why?


1) All the WBU fights
2) Ducking Witter at the time which was AT THE TIME the biggest fight out there...FACT!

I did not put AT THE TIME and I should have.

SN serve up crap!

:D
mark thompson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 662
Joined: 05 Sep 2008, 05:13

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by mark thompson »

I'm not arguing that SN serve up crap, i agree, but you need to take your I HEART Witter t-shirt off :oops:
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by DG. »

mark thompson wrote:I'm not arguing that SN serve up crap, i agree, but you need to take your I HEART Witter t-shirt off :oops:

I wear Savile Row,son!


:lol:
mark thompson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 662
Joined: 05 Sep 2008, 05:13

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by mark thompson »

DG. wrote:
mark thompson wrote:I'm not arguing that SN serve up crap, i agree, but you need to take your I HEART Witter t-shirt off :oops:

I wear Jimmy Savile Row,son!


:lol:
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by states »

Congratulations DG, I believe this is the 100th thread you've managed to turn into a Hatton-Witter debate, despite the original post having absolutely fornicate all to do with either of them. Seriously, let it go.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by DG. »

states wrote:Congratulations DG,

My pleasure!

I tried t get it back on toic, but what's a guy to do?


:D
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by DG. »

mark thompson wrote:
DG. wrote:
Lenny wrote:Do you think that because Cleverly (and probably Brook for that matter) have won belts and beaten a good opponent that Frank feels they can headline shows but is still nervous about their lack of experience when it comes to matching them? SN don't have as many headliners as before but is matching Cleverly against these African imports the best way to build his fanbase or prepare him for a probably fight against Francis?

Fwank may never again have a Naz - Hatton - Calzaghe type fighter so he has to protect his 'fighters' and in turn he turns them into laughing stocks (See Hatton and Calzaghe) but as long as Fwank gets paid he could not give a toss.


:D

How is Hatton a laughing stock ?

MT started it!

I made a point - MT carried it on!

Blame him.

SN serve up crap!



:D
mark thompson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 662
Joined: 05 Sep 2008, 05:13

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by mark thompson »

"MT started it" did you really just type that ??? :lol: :lol:

on a more serious note are you a close friend of Witter's ? no sarcastic replies please if possible :o
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by DG. »

mark thompson wrote:"MT started it" did you really just type that ??? :lol: :lol:

on a more serious note are you a close friend of Witter's ? no sarcastic replies please if possible :o
Its all comedy, son!

Witter? I am Witter!

All jokes aside...

We ALL know how hard it is to make a living these days and a fighters career is a very short one.

I just did not like the 'I do not want to give him a payday cra that hatton came out with..

As a Man who has ( like the rest of us) had to work hard for all I have ( or dont have :lol: ) it does not sit well with me when someone comes out woth crap like that. Hatton does not 'owe' Witter but talk like that is wrong. Just admit you thought you would lose.

SN serve up crap!


:D



:lol:
brian13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1853
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 15:01

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by brian13 »

Typical allegedly card, which is a load of garbage
mark thompson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 662
Joined: 05 Sep 2008, 05:13

Re: This Friday Fight Night

Post by mark thompson »

DG. wrote:
mark thompson wrote:"MT started it" did you really just type that ??? :lol: :lol:

on a more serious note are you a close friend of Witter's ? no sarcastic replies please if possible :o
Its all comedy, son!

Witter? I am Witter!

All jokes aside...

We ALL know how hard it is to make a living these days and a fighters career is a very short one.

I just did not like the 'I do not want to give him a payday cra that hatton came out with..

As a Man who has ( like the rest of us) had to work hard for all I have ( or dont have :lol: ) it does not sit well with me when someone comes out woth crap like that. Hatton does not 'owe' Witter but talk like that is wrong. Just admit you thought you would lose.

SN serve up crap!


:D



:lol:

Jesus the most sensible reply i have ever got from you DG, I still have to disagree with you about him losing to Twitter though :TU:
Post Reply