WBC / KLITSCHKO
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
WBC / KLITSCHKO
Vitali has made a formal complaint to the Court of Arbitration for Sport due to the WBC implementing two mandatories in a row -
Gomez and Maskaev.
Says he wants Arreola or HAYE after Gomez.
Still a chance for a big night at the O2 ?
Gomez and Maskaev.
Says he wants Arreola or HAYE after Gomez.
Still a chance for a big night at the O2 ?
Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO
why not have haye arreola to keep busy then the winner can take on vitali from what iv heard haye and arreola dont get on
-
doctorboxing
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 951
- Joined: 14 Aug 2008, 11:23
Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO
Thats far too logical for boxing!diggler wrote:why not have haye arreola to keep busy then the winner can take on vitali from what iv heard haye and arreola dont get on
Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO
sure i read it somewhere they sparred in miami and it got heated if i remember rightly arreola took exception to hayes punches
Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO
They definitely sparred. A rumour is that Haye knocked Arreola down.
Edit: post number 6666![[icon_twisted.gif] :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
Edit: post number 6666
Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO
it looks like haye takes no prisoners in sparring judging by this and audleys comments during the week.
Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO
Because if Haye-Wlad doesn't happen it'll probably be Arreola-Wladdiggler wrote:why not have haye arreola to keep busy then the winner can take on vitali from what iv heard haye and arreola dont get on
Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO
I don't know. In the last couple of years.BIGMARK wrote:when was this?Asterix wrote:They definitely sparred. A rumour is that Haye knocked Arreola down.
Edit: post number 6666
Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO
i remember a couple of years back garry delaney ko.d haye at the peacock during sparring thats why haye wouldn.t give delaney time to train when they boxedjspain wrote:it looks like haye takes no prisoners in sparring judging by this and audleys comments during the week.
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO
Back on topic, while I think Maskaev as a mandatory is copmpletely bogus, his manager has a point when he accuses Vitali of hypocrisy in complaining about back-to-back mandatories - when he himself was the beneficiary of (and pushed for) exactly that!
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO
As its the credit crunch he should solve the problem by doing a buy 1 get 1 free and fight them both on the same bill
D Ofcourse even if possible the WBC wouldn't allow that as they'd only get 1 fee
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO
Was Lennox-Vitali 1 a mando, thought it was a voluntary. Either way getting dominated by a man Vitali dominated shouldn't make you a mandatoryoliverfennell wrote:Back on topic, while I think Maskaev as a mandatory is copmpletely bogus, his manager has a point when he accuses Vitali of hypocrisy in complaining about back-to-back mandatories - when he himself was the beneficiary of (and pushed for) exactly that!
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO
I mean Vitali pushing for an immediate mandatory shot at the winner of Maskaev-Peter (who was the other mandatory).Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Was Lennox-Vitali 1 a mando, thought it was a voluntary. Either way getting dominated by a man Vitali dominated shouldn't make you a mandatoryoliverfennell wrote:Back on topic, while I think Maskaev as a mandatory is copmpletely bogus, his manager has a point when he accuses Vitali of hypocrisy in complaining about back-to-back mandatories - when he himself was the beneficiary of (and pushed for) exactly that!