WBC / KLITSCHKO

Post Reply
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

WBC / KLITSCHKO

Post by twenty six »

Vitali has made a formal complaint to the Court of Arbitration for Sport due to the WBC implementing two mandatories in a row -
Gomez and Maskaev.
Says he wants Arreola or HAYE after Gomez.
Still a chance for a big night at the O2 ?
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO

Post by 15829 »

why not have haye arreola to keep busy then the winner can take on vitali from what iv heard haye and arreola dont get on
doctorboxing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 14 Aug 2008, 11:23

Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO

Post by doctorboxing »

diggler wrote:why not have haye arreola to keep busy then the winner can take on vitali from what iv heard haye and arreola dont get on
Thats far too logical for boxing!
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO

Post by 15829 »

sure i read it somewhere they sparred in miami and it got heated if i remember rightly arreola took exception to hayes punches
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO

Post by Asterix »

They definitely sparred. A rumour is that Haye knocked Arreola down.

Edit: post number 6666 :twisted:
jspain
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 227
Joined: 26 Nov 2008, 22:48

Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO

Post by jspain »

it looks like haye takes no prisoners in sparring judging by this and audleys comments during the week.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO

Post by Chambers2 »

diggler wrote:why not have haye arreola to keep busy then the winner can take on vitali from what iv heard haye and arreola dont get on
Because if Haye-Wlad doesn't happen it'll probably be Arreola-Wlad
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO

Post by Asterix »

BIGMARK wrote:
Asterix wrote:They definitely sparred. A rumour is that Haye knocked Arreola down.

Edit: post number 6666 :twisted:
when was this?
I don't know. In the last couple of years.
1southpaw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 858
Joined: 28 Apr 2007, 14:23

Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO

Post by 1southpaw »

jspain wrote:it looks like haye takes no prisoners in sparring judging by this and audleys comments during the week.
i remember a couple of years back garry delaney ko.d haye at the peacock during sparring thats why haye wouldn.t give delaney time to train when they boxed
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO

Post by oliverfennell »

Back on topic, while I think Maskaev as a mandatory is copmpletely bogus, his manager has a point when he accuses Vitali of hypocrisy in complaining about back-to-back mandatories - when he himself was the beneficiary of (and pushed for) exactly that!
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

As its the credit crunch he should solve the problem by doing a buy 1 get 1 free and fight them both on the same bill :DD Ofcourse even if possible the WBC wouldn't allow that as they'd only get 1 fee
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

oliverfennell wrote:Back on topic, while I think Maskaev as a mandatory is copmpletely bogus, his manager has a point when he accuses Vitali of hypocrisy in complaining about back-to-back mandatories - when he himself was the beneficiary of (and pushed for) exactly that!
Was Lennox-Vitali 1 a mando, thought it was a voluntary. Either way getting dominated by a man Vitali dominated shouldn't make you a mandatory
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: WBC / KLITSCHKO

Post by oliverfennell »

Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
oliverfennell wrote:Back on topic, while I think Maskaev as a mandatory is copmpletely bogus, his manager has a point when he accuses Vitali of hypocrisy in complaining about back-to-back mandatories - when he himself was the beneficiary of (and pushed for) exactly that!
Was Lennox-Vitali 1 a mando, thought it was a voluntary. Either way getting dominated by a man Vitali dominated shouldn't make you a mandatory
I mean Vitali pushing for an immediate mandatory shot at the winner of Maskaev-Peter (who was the other mandatory).
Post Reply