The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post Reply
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by The Law »

:lol:

The 2 Georgians are absolutely tiny!
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by Poncey »

They look like they should be on the yellow brick road. 8)
split_decision
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 255
Joined: 26 Apr 2005, 16:11

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by split_decision »

WOW now there's a shock, british fighters heavier than their eastern european opponents. That never happens.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by Asterix »

James DeGale - 166.5 lbs
Frankie Gavin - 143.5 lbs
Billy Joe Saunders - 161.5 lbs :o
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by TerribleTerry »

Asterix wrote:James DeGale - 166.5 lbs
Frankie Gavin - 143.5 lbs
Billy Joe Saunders - 161.5 lbs :o
Regarding Frankie's weight he isnt overweight at all - the match was made at 10st 4lb I think so he is bang on the money.

It goes to show that even with twice daily pro workouts he is at least a light welter (maybe even a welter in years to come) how he ever boiled down to win the worlds I don't know. It makes his achievement all the more remarkable.

I was surprised by Saunder's announced weight myself but it must be down to natural growth - he is a tall lad - there was no excess on him at the weigh in.
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5844
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by tonyevs »

Their opponents were tiny in comparison - this is one side of boxing that disgusts me :x

With their amateur pedigree, they match them with guys who look atleast 2divisions smaller, what an advert that sends out to the occasional boxing fan.

Licensed bullying - def not a sport :(
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28495
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by Coco »

tonyevs wrote:Their opponents were tiny in comparison - this is one side of boxing that disgusts me :x

With their amateur pedigree, they match them with guys who look atleast 2divisions smaller, what an advert that sends out to the occasional boxing fan.

Licensed bullying - def not a sport :(
Well paid bullying though
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5844
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by tonyevs »

These guys are paid - and expected - to not last 2-3rnds, wheres the sport in that :witzend:

Well paid they may well be - but the paying spectator isnt getting value for money are they :(

It may well be part of building a prospects record, but its about time this type of thing was stopped, it isn`t good for the people buying tickets, most won`t even bother coming from the bar to watch it ... it isn`t good for the tv viewer, it just looks like bullying ... and as we have recently seen from another hot-prospect ... too many easy fights won`t prepare you for when the guy in front of you hits back :-?
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by TerribleTerry »

Everyone is allowed a 'gimme' on their debut, surely Tony?

I am a paying spectator tonight and I am not outraged by the standard of opponent - it is to be expected as far as I am concerned.

Overall I am looking forward to the show. There is a lot of class on the right hand side of the bill and with a couple of 'proper' fights (Skelton v Rogie and McDermott v Bendall; also The Don might have a bit of work if his opponent is as good as his record seems) to really get stuck into, I cant see the problem.

No one wants to see lads as talented as Gavin etc wrapped in cotton wool for 10 - 15 fights but lets see how the opposition is graded through the first 5 - 10 fights before writing the match making off..
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5844
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by tonyevs »

TerribleTerry wrote:Everyone is allowed a 'gimme' on their debut, surely Tony?..
Of course you want to protect the investment, just surely they could/should be made to make it more competitive?
Are these guys used to such one-sided matches when they were in the vest?
Their class should be enough to match them with somebody closer to their own physical size - that whilst not seriously risking upsetting the applecart .. would be expected to last the course trying.
TerribleTerry wrote:I am a paying spectator tonight and I am not outraged by the standard of opponent - it is to be expected as far as I am concerned...
Thats the point .. its expected because its the norm .. but that doesn`t make it right :(
TerribleTerry wrote:Overall I am looking forward to the show. There is a lot of class on the right hand side of the bill and with a couple of 'proper' fights (Skelton v Rogie and McDermott v Bendall; also The Don might have a bit of work if his opponent is as good as his record seems) to really get stuck into, I cant see the problem...
I too am looking forward to Skelton v Rogan .. two tough guys toughing it out .. fantastic :TU:
TerribleTerry wrote: No one wants to see lads as talented as Gavin etc wrapped in cotton wool for 10 - 15 fights but lets see how the opposition is graded through the first 5 - 10 fights before writing the match making off..
I just see them having the pedigree already to be matching them better.

Anyways, have a good night at the show tonight :TU:
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3341
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by Twinkle Toes »

I agree with Tony here, those fighters are way out of their depth, and not just in the weight department - I'm struggling to see how anyone can defend that type of matchmaking.

Our boys might be novice pro's but they are class fighters, and are not going to learn a thing blowing out bill and ben the flowerpot men.

Total rubbish..
boxerbob
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1041
Joined: 30 Oct 2005, 18:11

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by boxerbob »

what weight was skelton and rogan???
rmz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 209
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 14:07

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by rmz »

What a terrible bunch of mismatches, but they have to happen. Warren can't risk having an Olympian lose a debut. If an Olympian loses a debut, their career is over before it started. American Olympians have never lost their pro debuts, ever.
craigjenkins05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 477
Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by craigjenkins05 »

boxerbob wrote:what weight was skelton and rogan???



rogan was 16"1 and i think skelton was 17"9
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?

Post by gobbles »

rmz wrote:What a terrible bunch of mismatches, but they have to happen. Warren can't risk having an Olympian lose a debut. If an Olympian loses a debut, their career is over before it started. American Olympians have never lost their pro debuts, ever.
Well Pete Radamacher did, obviously
Post Reply