The 2 Georgians are absolutely tiny!
The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
The 2 Georgians are absolutely tiny!
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
They look like they should be on the yellow brick road. 8)
-
split_decision
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 255
- Joined: 26 Apr 2005, 16:11
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
WOW now there's a shock, british fighters heavier than their eastern european opponents. That never happens.
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
James DeGale - 166.5 lbs
Frankie Gavin - 143.5 lbs
Billy Joe Saunders - 161.5 lbs
Frankie Gavin - 143.5 lbs
Billy Joe Saunders - 161.5 lbs
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
Regarding Frankie's weight he isnt overweight at all - the match was made at 10st 4lb I think so he is bang on the money.Asterix wrote:James DeGale - 166.5 lbs
Frankie Gavin - 143.5 lbs
Billy Joe Saunders - 161.5 lbs
It goes to show that even with twice daily pro workouts he is at least a light welter (maybe even a welter in years to come) how he ever boiled down to win the worlds I don't know. It makes his achievement all the more remarkable.
I was surprised by Saunder's announced weight myself but it must be down to natural growth - he is a tall lad - there was no excess on him at the weigh in.
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
Their opponents were tiny in comparison - this is one side of boxing that disgusts me :x
With their amateur pedigree, they match them with guys who look atleast 2divisions smaller, what an advert that sends out to the occasional boxing fan.
Licensed bullying - def not a sport :(
With their amateur pedigree, they match them with guys who look atleast 2divisions smaller, what an advert that sends out to the occasional boxing fan.
Licensed bullying - def not a sport :(
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
Well paid bullying thoughtonyevs wrote:Their opponents were tiny in comparison - this is one side of boxing that disgusts me :x
With their amateur pedigree, they match them with guys who look atleast 2divisions smaller, what an advert that sends out to the occasional boxing fan.
Licensed bullying - def not a sport :(
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
These guys are paid - and expected - to not last 2-3rnds, wheres the sport in that
Well paid they may well be - but the paying spectator isnt getting value for money are they :(
It may well be part of building a prospects record, but its about time this type of thing was stopped, it isn`t good for the people buying tickets, most won`t even bother coming from the bar to watch it ... it isn`t good for the tv viewer, it just looks like bullying ... and as we have recently seen from another hot-prospect ... too many easy fights won`t prepare you for when the guy in front of you hits back
Well paid they may well be - but the paying spectator isnt getting value for money are they :(
It may well be part of building a prospects record, but its about time this type of thing was stopped, it isn`t good for the people buying tickets, most won`t even bother coming from the bar to watch it ... it isn`t good for the tv viewer, it just looks like bullying ... and as we have recently seen from another hot-prospect ... too many easy fights won`t prepare you for when the guy in front of you hits back
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
Everyone is allowed a 'gimme' on their debut, surely Tony?
I am a paying spectator tonight and I am not outraged by the standard of opponent - it is to be expected as far as I am concerned.
Overall I am looking forward to the show. There is a lot of class on the right hand side of the bill and with a couple of 'proper' fights (Skelton v Rogie and McDermott v Bendall; also The Don might have a bit of work if his opponent is as good as his record seems) to really get stuck into, I cant see the problem.
No one wants to see lads as talented as Gavin etc wrapped in cotton wool for 10 - 15 fights but lets see how the opposition is graded through the first 5 - 10 fights before writing the match making off..
I am a paying spectator tonight and I am not outraged by the standard of opponent - it is to be expected as far as I am concerned.
Overall I am looking forward to the show. There is a lot of class on the right hand side of the bill and with a couple of 'proper' fights (Skelton v Rogie and McDermott v Bendall; also The Don might have a bit of work if his opponent is as good as his record seems) to really get stuck into, I cant see the problem.
No one wants to see lads as talented as Gavin etc wrapped in cotton wool for 10 - 15 fights but lets see how the opposition is graded through the first 5 - 10 fights before writing the match making off..
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
Of course you want to protect the investment, just surely they could/should be made to make it more competitive?TerribleTerry wrote:Everyone is allowed a 'gimme' on their debut, surely Tony?..
Are these guys used to such one-sided matches when they were in the vest?
Their class should be enough to match them with somebody closer to their own physical size - that whilst not seriously risking upsetting the applecart .. would be expected to last the course trying.
Thats the point .. its expected because its the norm .. but that doesn`t make it right :(TerribleTerry wrote:I am a paying spectator tonight and I am not outraged by the standard of opponent - it is to be expected as far as I am concerned...
I too am looking forward to Skelton v Rogan .. two tough guys toughing it out .. fantasticTerribleTerry wrote:Overall I am looking forward to the show. There is a lot of class on the right hand side of the bill and with a couple of 'proper' fights (Skelton v Rogie and McDermott v Bendall; also The Don might have a bit of work if his opponent is as good as his record seems) to really get stuck into, I cant see the problem...
I just see them having the pedigree already to be matching them better.TerribleTerry wrote: No one wants to see lads as talented as Gavin etc wrapped in cotton wool for 10 - 15 fights but lets see how the opposition is graded through the first 5 - 10 fights before writing the match making off..
Anyways, have a good night at the show tonight
-
Twinkle Toes
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3341
- Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
I agree with Tony here, those fighters are way out of their depth, and not just in the weight department - I'm struggling to see how anyone can defend that type of matchmaking.
Our boys might be novice pro's but they are class fighters, and are not going to learn a thing blowing out bill and ben the flowerpot men.
Total rubbish..
Our boys might be novice pro's but they are class fighters, and are not going to learn a thing blowing out bill and ben the flowerpot men.
Total rubbish..
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
what weight was skelton and rogan???
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
What a terrible bunch of mismatches, but they have to happen. Warren can't risk having an Olympian lose a debut. If an Olympian loses a debut, their career is over before it started. American Olympians have never lost their pro debuts, ever.
-
craigjenkins05
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 477
- Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
boxerbob wrote:what weight was skelton and rogan???
rogan was 16"1 and i think skelton was 17"9
Re: The Olympians Weigh In, guess who's over weight?
Well Pete Radamacher did, obviouslyrmz wrote:What a terrible bunch of mismatches, but they have to happen. Warren can't risk having an Olympian lose a debut. If an Olympian loses a debut, their career is over before it started. American Olympians have never lost their pro debuts, ever.