Would you Rate Froch Higher than Calzaghe if he beat.......

Post Reply
exittored
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1565
Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 19:40

Would you Rate Froch Higher than Calzaghe if he beat.......

Post by exittored »

Lets say Froch makes 10 defences at Super Middle over the next few years and than retires and some of the Boxer's he beat were:

Jermain Taylor
Lucian Bute
Mikkel Kessler
Pavlik/Abraham winner
Andre Ward or Andre Dirrel

and wins over a few of these: Sakio Bika, Allan Green, Karoly Balzsay, Librado Andrade

Would those wins be better than Calzaghe's best wins at Super Middle: Kessler, Lacy, Eubanks, Robin Reid, Bika and Byron Mitchell

What do you think?
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27507
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Would you Rate Froch Higher than Calzaghe if he beat.......

Post by stujones »

Yes for me, unless someone else comes through and Froch avoids. For me, equally as important in a fighters resume is the fights he missed. With that... there aint many Froch missed, unless someone comes through.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Would you Rate Froch Higher than Calzaghe if he beat.......

Post by alexpaterson »

I dont know i cant see him beating AA or Kessler but if he did i still dont think he would be better than him Calzaghe beat Hopkins who has just established himself as a top 3 p4p at the moment and he's beat most of the SM but it would be close but i dont think he would beat a few of the best SM
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Re: Would you Rate Froch Higher than Calzaghe if he beat.......

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

No because Kessler Joe beat, Pavlik BHOps beat and Taylor Pavlik beat. Maybe if he beat Dawson and Williams to add to the list
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3342
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Would you Rate Froch Higher than Calzaghe if he beat.......

Post by Twinkle Toes »

This thread wants moving to the fantasy forum...
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Would you Rate Froch Higher than Calzaghe if he beat.......

Post by whiskey »

I thought i was on eastside for a sec...
hitman09
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1838
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 10:39

Re: Would you Rate Froch Higher than Calzaghe if he beat.......

Post by hitman09 »

Add Chad Dawson to that and Froch is ahead of Calzaghe. Not going to happen though, he won't beat Bute or Kessler.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Would you Rate Froch Higher than Calzaghe if he beat.......

Post by gobbles »

The problem with this is, in reality, he has only beaten Pascal so far. Taylor is a good step, but if he wins and Taylor retires, some will start knocking that already. If he could beat an Abraham or a Pavlik or a Dawson, that would be quite impressive.
Pat Butcher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 227
Joined: 06 Jul 2008, 04:40

Re: Would you Rate Froch Higher than Calzaghe if he beat.......

Post by Pat Butcher »

that is one massive IF, would be great to see even half of those fights though
Grilling Machine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3159
Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28

Re: Would you Rate Froch Higher than Calzaghe if he beat.......

Post by Grilling Machine »

Calzaghe was so frustrating because, for one reason or another, he didn't get fights that he had every chance of winning. Froch will risk losing, and we (mostly) respect that. Possibly a bit unfair on Calzaghe there, though, since he wasn't dumb enough to take wins for granted.

In terms of pure ability in their primes, it'll always be Calzaghe out in front. But Froch could well end up being far more popular.
Post Reply