Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by steve689 »

Bit of a mystery isn't it? I know Luke Wilton is on against Del Spencer but other than that.... :-? Would be a great opportunity to give local lads some runouts.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by 15829 »

scott belshaw is fighting on it an maguire
metropol
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 858
Joined: 20 May 2008, 14:07

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by metropol »

Ryan rodes is on it . Personally i think its a shame that there aren't more Irish fighters on it . Maybe that's why hayemaker delayed announcing the under card , so irish fans would buy tickets assuming that there would be some more Irish on it
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3342
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by Twinkle Toes »

Ryan Rhodes?

I take it he isn't fighting Small now then - Twenty six get your ass in here and defend your man :lol:
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by steve689 »

I would have liked to have seen more local talent getting runouts and even though Belshaw is on the Warren bill I didn't hear he was on this one as well but would be a good if he got a slot.

http://www.britishboxing.net/news_4504- ... pleby.html
beagleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 14:31

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by beagleboy »

Twinkle Toes wrote:Ryan Rhodes?

I take it he isn't fighting Small now then - Twenty six get your ass in here and defend your man :lol:
:o :geek: :o :geek: :o :geek: :o :geek:
beagleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 14:31

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by beagleboy »

I've never known her so quiet.


Maybe she's caught a cold. :geek:
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by slapbangwhallop »

steve689 wrote:I would have liked to have seen more local talent getting runouts and even though Belshaw is on the Warren bill I didn't hear he was on this one as well but would be a good if he got a slot.

http://www.britishboxing.net/news_4504- ... pleby.html
To be fair I reckon that there is feck all left in the pot after Hayemaker went all out to pay Appleby's purse.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by steve689 »

Yes I heard Appleby was on a massive purse for this one.
metropol
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 858
Joined: 20 May 2008, 14:07

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by metropol »

steve689 wrote:Yes I heard Appleby was on a massive purse for this one.
What ball park figure would you say he is getting for this fight ? He is only very young but is the champion . Im fairly nieve when it comes to the amount boxers get paid
bigped
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1572
Joined: 05 Jul 2004, 16:26

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by bigped »

metropol wrote:
steve689 wrote:Yes I heard Appleby was on a massive purse for this one.
What ball park figure would you say he is getting for this fight ? He is only very young but is the champion . Im fairly nieve when it comes to the amount boxers get paid
72k..... so pauls family are saying anyway.
Ted
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 381
Joined: 24 Aug 2007, 03:39

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by Ted »

bigped wrote:
metropol wrote:
steve689 wrote:Yes I heard Appleby was on a massive purse for this one.
What ball park figure would you say he is getting for this fight ? He is only very young but is the champion . Im fairly nieve when it comes to the amount boxers get paid
72k..... so pauls family are saying anyway.

No way!
bigped
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1572
Joined: 05 Jul 2004, 16:26

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by bigped »

bigped wrote:
metropol wrote:
steve689 wrote:Yes I heard Appleby was on a massive purse for this one.
What ball park figure would you say he is getting for this fight ? He is only very young but is the champion . Im fairly nieve when it comes to the amount boxers get paid
72k..... so pauls family are saying anyway.

maybe not mate. just what his parents told me....
whiteboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 19:48

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by whiteboy »

leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by leforge »

Good for the boxers but are the promotors paying well over the normal asking price.
metropol
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 858
Joined: 20 May 2008, 14:07

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by metropol »

bigped wrote:
metropol wrote:
steve689 wrote:Yes I heard Appleby was on a massive purse for this one.
What ball park figure would you say he is getting for this fight ? He is only very young but is the champion . Im fairly nieve when it comes to the amount boxers get paid
72k..... so pauls family are saying anyway.
Wow , thats quite alot , why is it so much is it the fact that its away from home for apelby .
beagleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 14:31

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by beagleboy »

leforge wrote:Good for the boxers but are the promotors paying well over the normal asking price.
The promoters are quite new to the business, you can't help wondering if they are doing their sums correctly.
Let's hope they've got some pennies left for Rhodes v Small. :geek:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by Counter-puncher »

beagleboy wrote:I've never known her so quiet.


Maybe she's caught a cold. :geek:
here's a thought mate: maybe he's got other things to do than going on the internet to 'banter' with the likes of you?

I mean, maybe, just maybe, at every single piece of boxing news related to Ryan Rhodes, he actually doesn't immediately think 'Christ i'd better get on boxrec and defend Ryan, otherwise heaven help him, for surely that beagleboy will run amok with Ryan's reputation in my critical absence'

just a thought for you to ponder.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by steve689 »

I knew it was big but 72k even surprised me!
Ted
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 381
Joined: 24 Aug 2007, 03:39

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by Ted »

wheres me gloves :o :box:
BigEars
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 998
Joined: 16 Jan 2006, 14:23

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by BigEars »

steve689 wrote:I knew it was big but 72k even surprised me!
That's crazy tbh, as if Gilmour wouldn't have taken £50,000 and been delighted, Gilmour probably would of still got to say it was the biggest purse he'd ever dealt with by a long way. The extra money seems needless.

However I'm happy for Paul, he's a good young fighter and normally domestic fighters aren't paid enough so I'm happy he's getting his money.
I hope Lindsay is getting paid well for this too, anyone got an idea of the Belfast man's purse ?
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by bennie »

Paul "Chuckles" Appleby defends his British featherweight title against Martin Lindsay in a mouthwatering clash at the Ulster Hall in the proper fight city of Belfast on Saturday.
Lindsay is the local star, the mandatory.
These two due to meet last year in Glasgow but Lindsay required a stint of dental surgery and was forced to withdraw. Perhaps it made more business sense. Appleby, 14-0 (9), then got a straight shot at the British title and punched out a desperately tight decision over gritty fellow Scot John Simpson at the tender age of 20. Still only 21, Appleby retained with another hard-earned decision over canny Sheffield veteran Esham Pickering in Glasgow in November.
This fight is bigger and better now.
Appleby is a great prospect and a hard puncher but Lindsay, 13-0 (5), comes off a spectacular nine-round knockout of Liverpool strongman Derry Matthews in Sheffield, courtesy of a stunning left hook. Hailed as the new Barry McGuigan a few years ago, Martin showed why with that left hook. Matthews had held a win over Simpson, which makes this even more interesting.
Both unbeaten, both 'big' featherweights, both with real talent and ambition, Lindsay is five years older than the champion at 26 but 26 is hardly old and he enjoyed a distinguished amateur career. Ultimately, home advantage in a packed Ulster Hall might just swing it in the Irishman's favour.
Can't wait.
Last edited by bennie on 22 Apr 2009, 06:22, edited 1 time in total.
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by TerribleTerry »

bennie wrote: Can't wait.
x 2 :TU:
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by steve689 »

Brave call Bennie. I'm slightly swinging towards Appleby but it's a real 50/50 affair.

Come on then - who's going?? :box:
Gazmac81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2103
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 10:06

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by Gazmac81 »

Is Rhodes And Small still on for a later Date
Something isnt right here
Counter-puncher wrote:
beagleboy wrote:I've never known her so quiet.


Maybe she's caught a cold. :geek:
here's a thought mate: maybe he's got other things to do than going on the internet to 'banter' with the likes of you?

I mean, maybe, just maybe, at every single piece of boxing news related to Ryan Rhodes, he actually doesn't immediately think 'Christ i'd better get on boxrec and defend Ryan, otherwise heaven help him, for surely that beagleboy will run amok with Ryan's reputation in my critical absence'

just a thought for you to ponder.
Post Reply