Hang On a minute Here!!

DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by DG. »

Carbo wrote:
DG. wrote:
Carbo wrote:
You're really making yourself look like a plonker.

You really try to hard to appear bright, you are not.

I do not have to prove anything to you, I am comfortable with my things, plus I most lkely earn more than you, I bet that worries you!

Get back to work, you intellectual you!


:lol:
So, now you're completely ignoring the argument and resorting to pure Ad Hominum attacks.

Of course, I've indulged in such tactics my self, but always as part of an argument.

The consession has arrived, I guess.

And I am bright -- no two ways about it.

Smarter than the av-er-age bear.
I don't think you are bright, but you want us to think you are, by telling us you are bright you have let us into a secret, you are not capable of understanding anything other than your own drivel.

Elite European would consist of the TOP fighters in Europe, naybe someone can explain it to you.


Carbo, you must be drunk?


:lol:
DaveyH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 195
Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 15:47

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by DaveyH »

Whether Hattons punch resistance has eroded or not, my opinion is that he's not been the same since losing to Floyd.
Altho he took a pretty wide points decision, he made hard work of the Lazcano fight, and don't get me started on that feather fisted New Yorker, who's best performance was losing to Miguel Cotto!
Taking fights like the above after losing to Floyd so badly was understandable in a way that it eased him back into competing, but then jumping up several levels of ability to face Pac man was a bridge too far. He'd have been better going after Bradley or even someone like Kotelnik before taking on Manny, but obviously not from a financial viewpoint because should he lose the mega bucks battle with Pac would be chucked in the bin.
Hatton took a big gamble and was cruelly exposed
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by Carbo »

DG. wrote:
Carbo wrote:

Well, I suspect that I wouldn't need to crank up the intellectual level too far for your eyes to glaze over.

But, ok, let's take your definition, by which we would need to have elites for each level. You know, European elite, P4P elite, B-Level elite, Southern Area elite.

It's risible. There is no such thing as "European elite"! That's preposterous. What we do have is a "European level". But not European elite, any more than than there is a Northern Area elite or a B-level elite.

You're really making yourself look like a plonker.
You dumb bastard.

Ever heard of the phrase 'Big fish in a small pond?

Howard Eastman ruled Europe for ages and was head and shoulders above his domestic rivals.

You could call him the elite of the European fighters.

Danny Williams ruled the British Heavy scene for years, you could call him the King of the British Heavies, or the elite of the British Heavies.

Are you drunk?

Hatton in the MEN was a big fish in a small pond.

In the big p4p pond, he was really a small fish.

:D
Nobody ever -- ever -- called Danny Williams an elite level fighter. :lol:

Like I say, if you want to call the better domestic fighters "Domestic elite" and the better guys from the Southern Area "elite Southern Area" that's entirely up to you, but I would proffer that it's not really received practice. You can even call them British and Southern Area Bananas if you want to tip your hat to Alfred Khan.

But would it not be simpler to just, like, omit the word elite? Like, European level, or domestic level, or world class. Instead of elite this and elite that.

If you want to invent this labourious new stratification of the word 'elite' as it relates to boxing, that's fine, and, I'd have to say that I'd agree with you when you argue that Hatton doesn't belong in the pound for pound elite, but does belong in the 140 pound elite and pound for pound non-elite (in your terms).

Would it not be easier to say that Hatton was a cut above most world class 140lb-ers, was probably elite, and fell short when he faced true all time greats?

But, anyway, to say, point blank, that he's not elite, and never has been, is plain wrong. For that to be correct, we need something like your slilly and ponderous addition of the word elite to every level of boxing known to man.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by DG. »

Carbo wrote:

If you want to invent this labourious new stratification of the word 'elite' as it relates to boxing, that's fine, and, I'd have to say

This from the man who made up the phase.. Super Elite!

:lol:


Howard Eastman was at one time the Elite of the European crop.

Get used to it.

Like Hatton against Pac, you have been outclassed.

:D
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by Carbo »

DG. wrote:
Carbo wrote:

If you want to invent this labourious new stratification of the word 'elite' as it relates to boxing, that's fine, and, I'd have to say

This from the man who made up the phase.. Super Elite!

:lol:


Howard Eastman was at one time the Elite of the European crop.

Get used to it.

Like Hatton against Pac, you have been outclassed.

:D
Really. If you're just going to keep repeating the same thing and ignore the counter arguments and call that a victory, then well done. I would probably argue, though, that the limit of a good argument isn't a noun, a pejorative and a smilely.

I'll let the forum be the judge of who won, since you're no longer making any argument beyond repeating your initial statements.
Last edited by Carbo on 04 May 2009, 06:10, edited 1 time in total.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by DG. »

DaveyH wrote:Whether Hattons punch resistance has eroded or not, my opinion is that he's not been the same since losing to Floyd.
Altho he took a pretty wide points decision, he made hard work of the Lazcano fight, and don't get me started on that feather fisted New Yorker, who's best performance was losing to Miguel Cotto!
Taking fights like the above after losing to Floyd so badly was understandable in a way that it eased him back into competing, but then jumping up several levels of ability to face Pac man was a bridge too far. He'd have been better going after Bradley or even someone like Kotelnik before taking on Manny, but obviously not from a financial viewpoint because should he lose the mega bucks battle with Pac would be chucked in the bin.
Hatton took a big gamble and was cruelly exposed
Hatton wants the most money he can get. Bradley etc would also have a chance of beating him but then he would not make the money or be able to say I got my ass beat into dust by the P4P King.

Since Hatton has gone to the states his body attack (bar Castillo) have been non existent.

Hatton was elite Euro level, average World.


:D
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by DG. »

Carbo wrote:
DG. wrote:
Carbo wrote:

If you want to invent this labourious new stratification of the word 'elite' as it relates to boxing, that's fine, and, I'd have to say

This from the man who made up the phase.. Super Elite!

:lol:


Howard Eastman was at one time the Elite of the European crop.

Get used to it.

Like Hatton against Pac, you have been outclassed.

:D
Really.

I'll let the forum be the judge of that.

You must be hungover.

:lol:
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by DG. »

Read this Carbo!

www.
british
boxing.net/
news_4273- A-British
-boxing-wish-list-for-2009.html

If I have one wish and hope for British boxing in 2009 it is simply this; to see a few more world champions.

So in the world of British boxing who are the names that could be written on a world championship belt in 2009?

The answers to this question are not so obvious because our elite fighters, Joe Calzaghe and Ricky Hatton are not holding any WBC, WBA, IBF or WBO belt, yet both are acclaimed as the best in their respective weights of light-heavyweight and light-welterweight.



Here we have Joe Calzaghe and Hatton described as OUR ELITE - meaning British Elite.

Calzaghe is ELITE as in World Elite, but we all know Hatton is not WORLD ELITE!

Hatton is elite in his division, but not in P4P!

Carbo, you have been knocked out like Hatton against Pacman.




:lol:
Last edited by DG. on 04 May 2009, 06:26, edited 3 times in total.
DaveyH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 195
Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 15:47

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by DaveyH »

In terms of Hattons overall world standing, I'd say he's about the same as the guy who he just edged by, Luis Collazo.
Collazo is a decent enough operator, good enough to hold his own right up to the top of his division, but will ultimately come up short against the top guys (see his fight with Mosley).
In my opinion Hattons actual ability has always been outweighed by his popularity and the way he's been marketed. If Hatton was American I doubt he'd stand out any more than someone like Collazo or if marketed right could have a career like say Gatti, hugely entertaining and popular but essentially limited.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by DG. »

DaveyH wrote:In terms of Hattons overall world standing, I'd say he's about the same as the guy who he just edged by, Luis Collazo.
Collazo is a decent enough operator, good enough to hold his own right up to the top of his division, but will ultimately come up short against the top guys (see his fight with Mosley).
In my opinion Hattons actual ability has always been outweighed by his popularity and the way he's been marketed. If Hatton was American I doubt he'd stand out any more than someone like Collazo or if marketed right could have a career like say Gatti, hugely entertaining and popular but essentially limited.

:TU:
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by Carbo »

DG. wrote:Read this Carbo!

www.
british
spam/
news_4273- A-British
-boxing-wish-list-for-2009.html

If I have one wish and hope for British boxing in 2009 it is simply this; to see a few more world champions.

So in the world of British boxing who are the names that could be written on a world championship belt in 2009?

The answers to this question are not so obvious because our elite fighters, Joe Calzaghe and Ricky Hatton are not holding any WBC, WBA, IBF or WBO belt, yet both are acclaimed as the best in their respective weights of light-heavyweight and light-welterweight.



Here we have Joe Calzaghe and Hatton escribed as OUR ELITE - meaning British Elite.

Calzaghe is ELITE as in World Elite, but we all know Hatton is not WORLD ELITE!

Carno, you have been knocked out like Hatton against Pacman.



:lol:
Errr, no. It means OUR MEMBERS OF THE ELITE.

Idiot.

You make yourself look more foolish with every post, I'm afraid.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by DG. »

Carbo wrote:
DG. wrote:Read this Carbo!

www.
british
spam/
news_4273- A-British
-boxing-wish-list-for-2009.html

If I have one wish and hope for British boxing in 2009 it is simply this; to see a few more world champions.

So in the world of British boxing who are the names that could be written on a world championship belt in 2009?

The answers to this question are not so obvious because our elite fighters, Joe Calzaghe and Ricky Hatton are not holding any WBC, WBA, IBF or WBO belt, yet both are acclaimed as the best in their respective weights of light-heavyweight and light-welterweight.



Here we have Joe Calzaghe and Hatton escribed as OUR ELITE - meaning British Elite.

Calzaghe is ELITE as in World Elite, but we all know Hatton is not WORLD ELITE!

Carno, you have been knocked out like Hatton against Pacman.



:lol:
Errr, no. It means OUR MEMBERS OF THE ELITE.

Idiot.

You make yourself look more foolish with every post, I'm afraid.

How about the bit about Hatton being the best in HIS Division - does it not imply he is ELITE in his division?

Hatton is not P4P Elite, but he IS in the 140Lbs division.

The WORD ELITE does not refer to the P4P - it can not.

Are you thick?

Ok, lets just agree that I am right and your are drunk.


THE PHRASE IS

'OUR ELITE FIGHTERS'.

Take it as you wish.

Lay off the Stellar.



:lol:
Last edited by DG. on 04 May 2009, 06:31, edited 1 time in total.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26341
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by banjo »

Does anyone think that if he'd been given opponents early in his career who he had to use his brain to beat rather than use his strength he'd be a better rounded fighter today?
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by DG. »

banjo wrote:Does anyone think that if he'd been given opponents early in his career who he had to use his brain to beat rather than use his strength he'd be a better rounded fighter today?

100% correct.

He was never prepared to fight the best in the world, look how he struggled against basic figters on the world stage, cuts to bits by Maussa, hugged urango to shit and scraped by Collazo,

Fwank made him and Hatton believed he was beter than he was.

He has not evolved at all.

Hatton WAS ELITE BRITISH/EURO LEVEL but on the world stage?

Average.

:TU:
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by Carbo »

DG. wrote:
Carbo wrote:
DG. wrote:Read this Carbo!

www.
british
spam/
news_4273- A-British
-boxing-wish-list-for-2009.html

If I have one wish and hope for British boxing in 2009 it is simply this; to see a few more world champions.

So in the world of British boxing who are the names that could be written on a world championship belt in 2009?

The answers to this question are not so obvious because our elite fighters, Joe Calzaghe and Ricky Hatton are not holding any WBC, WBA, IBF or WBO belt, yet both are acclaimed as the best in their respective weights of light-heavyweight and light-welterweight.



Here we have Joe Calzaghe and Hatton escribed as OUR ELITE - meaning British Elite.

Calzaghe is ELITE as in World Elite, but we all know Hatton is not WORLD ELITE!

Carno, you have been knocked out like Hatton against Pacman.



:lol:
Errr, no. It means OUR MEMBERS OF THE ELITE.

Idiot.

You make yourself look more foolish with every post, I'm afraid.

How about the bit about Hatton being the best in HIS Division - does it not imply he is ELITE in his division?

Hatton is not P4P Elite, but he IS in the 140Lbs division.

The WORD ELITE does not refer to the P4P - it can not.

Are you thick?

Ok, lets just agree that I am right and your are drunk.

:lol:
So you admit that your last example was patently wrong. Now we're getting somewhere -- although it does show that you're a bit of an idiot; that you're not able to understand properly your native language.

Anyway, Hatton was certainly an elite 140lb-er and at times he was in the P4P top twenty. That, to me, makes him elite full stop. But then, I see Pacquaio and Mayweather, as two guys who have been at the top of the p4p charts for a long time, as being, by definition, better than the rest of the P4P top 10. They're all time greats. In the same way that the SAS pick the best of the Parachute Regiment, which is already an elite unit, so Mayweather and Pacquiao are better than the rest of the current elite.

To measure them, you have to go through history and measure them against other guys who were better than even the elites of their eras.

Now, like I say, if you want to call Hatton 140lb elite, and p4p non-elite, but not elite-elite or world-class-elite or Manchester banana, then fine: I agree.

If you want to make some baseless, unqualified statement that "Hatton isn't elite", then not fine.

See?
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by hurlock »

it's wrong to say hatton wasnt world class imo,after he moved up he should of stayed there as i believe he was never as strong back @ lww, but billy graham would insist he aint no welter showing no faith.
he beat collazo he scraped it but still i felt deservedly,collazo fought mosely with one hand & was very unlucky not to win v berto so that victory doe's stand up.
he cocked up against mw coming in light as he's training camps consist of basically boiling down to get fit leaving little room for the fundemental aspects.
dg your right in saying were did the body salvo's go,& that he couldnt do it once he stepped up,i think having great ability got him to where he wanted to be,but he let himself down not living the life doing dinner shows walking about @ 14st plus in a dickie bow as most are still fit walking around 10-15 lbs over max.
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by Carbo »

hurlock wrote:it's wrong to say hatton wasnt world class imo,after he moved up he should of stayed there as i believe he was never as strong back @ lww, but billy graham would insist he aint no welter showing no faith.
he beat collazo he scraped it but still i felt deservedly,collazo fought mosely with one hand & was very unlucky not to win v berto so that victory doe's stand up.
he cocked up against mw coming in light as he's training camps consist of basically boiling down to get fit leaving little room for the fundemental aspects.
dg your right in saying were did the body salvo's go,& that he couldnt do it once he stepped up,i think having great ability got him to where he wanted to be,but he let himself down not living the life doing dinner shows walking about @ 14st plus in a dickie bow as most are still fit walking around 10-15 lbs over max.
Yup. Good points all.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by DG. »

Carbo wrote:


If you want to make some baseless, unqualified statement that "Hatton isn't elite", then not fine.

I am not agreeing with you. :lol:

I wil say this - Hatton getting in the ring with 2 elite fighters does not make him elite.

He was crushed both times and had no success at all.

Outclassed and out of his depth.

Mismatches!


:lol:
DaveyH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 195
Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 15:47

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by DaveyH »

banjo wrote:Does anyone think that if he'd been given opponents early in his career who he had to use his brain to beat rather than use his strength he'd be a better rounded fighter today?
Possibly, but maybe his camp knew all along what his limitations were so concentrated on making up for it by building up his strength and developing him as a tough pressure fighter.

Of course this has it's big flaws, as we have seen, but I think the biggest problem is he actually started to think he was unbeatable at light welterweight. He blamed the Collazo and Floyd performances solely on moving up in weight and judging by the way he started against Pac, he thought he could blast his way through simply because at 10 stone Hatton is invincible :roll:
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by Carbo »

DG. wrote:
Carbo wrote:


If you want to make some baseless, unqualified statement that "Hatton isn't elite", then not fine.

I am not agreeing with you. :lol:

I wil say this - Hatton getting in the ring with 2 elite fighters does not make him elite.

He was crushed both times and had no success at all.

Outclassed and out of his depth.

Mismatches!


:lol:
Do you see what you did there? You ignored my whole last post, and then repeated your original point of view.

Like I say, a good argument isn't a noun, a pejorative and a smiley.

It seems like that's your limit, though.

Nor is good debating skill just repeating your point over and over, with the flourish of a new smiley.

OK, gotta dash. I'll come back later and see if you have managed any new arguments, or even to counter mine.
Last edited by Carbo on 04 May 2009, 06:46, edited 2 times in total.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by Autobarn »

Hatton didn't just get caught though. The last punch that Pac threw had been cocked from a mile back and a really top class fighter - like Marquez or Mayweather - would have seen it coming.

It was an alarming fight as he got stopped by the smaller man, knocked on his back.

Hatton can probably still beat the above average fighters of Malignaggi's calibre, like Holt, Bradley, etc by why would he want to. He did show he could adjust his style when dominating Paulie in his previous fight.

Ricky's marketability will be seriously dented over in America now, though. Only big fight I can think of is a big UK clash with Khan down the line. Surely Ricky will contribute to boxing via promiting from now on?
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by DG. »

Autobarn wrote:Hatton didn't just get caught though. The last punch that Pac threw had been cocked from a mile back and a really top class fighter - like Marquez or Mayweather - would have seen it coming.

It was an alarming fight as he got stopped by the smaller man, knocked on his back.

Hatton can probably still beat the above average fighters of Malignaggi's calibre, like Holt, Bradley, etc by why would he want to. He did show he could adjust his style when dominating Paulie in his previous fight.

Ricky's marketability will be seriously dented over in America now, though. Only big fight I can think of is a big UK clash with Khan down the line. Surely Ricky will contribute to boxing via promiting from now on?

For those reasons, I think he is finished.
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by Carbo »

Autobarn wrote:Hatton didn't just get caught though. The last punch that Pac threw had been cocked from a mile back and a really top class fighter - like Marquez or Mayweather - would have seen it coming.

It was an alarming fight as he got stopped by the smaller man, knocked on his back.

Hatton can probably still beat the above average fighters of Malignaggi's calibre, like Holt, Bradley, etc by why would he want to. He did show he could adjust his style when dominating Paulie in his previous fight.

Ricky's marketability will be seriously dented over in America now, though. Only big fight I can think of is a big UK clash with Khan down the line. Surely Ricky will contribute to boxing via promiting from now on?
Yup. I pretty much agree with that.

He just isn't good enough to hack it against the likes of Mayweather and Pacquaio. Sorry to say that, but it's true.

He's a cut above the B level fighters, and I still think he has it in him to beat the likes of Holt, URango, and Bradley.

But as for stepping in with all time greats? Forget about it.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26341
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by banjo »

Possibly, but maybe his camp knew all along what his limitations were so concentrated on making up for it by building up his strength and developing him as a tough pressure fighter.
Yeah but the idea is to work on those limitations, apparently Hatton was a very talented amateur who was fighting often in international championships but as a pro we only saw glimpses of this talent. Promoters are seemingly terrified to see their fighter pick up a loss but look at David Haye, his solitary loss was the best thing that happened to him IMO as it made him work on his flaws and went on to become a world champion and possibly a world heavyweight champion too.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hang On a minute Here!!

Post by DG. »

When he should have ben learning he was beating Superfeathers and lightweights at the MEN.
Post Reply