macklin v barker

macklin v barker who wins?

Poll ended at 22 Jul 2009, 17:33

macklin pts
7
7%
macklin ko
34
36%
barker pts
26
28%
barker ko
27
29%
 
Total votes: 94

mossy141
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 90
Joined: 26 Feb 2009, 15:03

macklin v barker

Post by mossy141 »

who wins??
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11805
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: macklin v barker

Post by Old bones Ian »

Macklin, to big a puncher, to strong.
brian13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1853
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 15:01

Re: macklin v barker

Post by brian13 »

Macklin has power and I don't think Barker has a good chin. Macklin by stoppage
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: macklin v barker

Post by alexpaterson »

I think Barker would be to clever for Macklin and Barker would move and hit and catch Macklin and he would have no answer im saying 8th round for Barker
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: macklin v barker

Post by Spud »

Old bones Ian wrote:Macklin, to big a puncher, to strong.
Dont say that - ffs!!! look at my Darren Barker thread - f*ck me you are in for it "Old Bones" :lol: :lol:
potnoodle
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 130
Joined: 08 May 2009, 08:34

Re: macklin v barker

Post by potnoodle »

Barker all day long!!!! Different class.
TJAY
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 67
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 13:22

Re: macklin v barker

Post by TJAY »

Different class :DDD got that right Macklin is levels above he is the more rounded pro fought better opposition , can punch and has a good chin. Some people getting carried away with the hype. But Barker in With Gerard next or Martin Murray he needs them fights before taking on Macklin.
DuranTheGreat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 41
Joined: 07 Aug 2008, 08:37

Re: macklin v barker

Post by DuranTheGreat »

You lot make me laugh!
Barker would give Macklin a boxing lesson
Macklin stepped it up to fight Facey, and lost. Macklin stepped it up to fight Moore and lost.
Yes, he did smash Elcock, but IMO Barker would do the same and better to Elcock.
Macklin is a SMALL Middleweight and wouldn't hurt Barker
Barker has been hurt, but come back bigger and stronger and still hasn't lost. Whereas Macklin has been hurt and lost.
The fight will be competitive, but Barker will come out the champ.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6638
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: macklin v barker

Post by THEBUTCH »

I just pray the fight happens because, for me, these are probably the two best middleweights in the country right now and it will do the British scene the power of good to get these two meeting with the British title on the line. It doesn't get much better than this.

Both have just won in impressive fashion, but Barker and Macklin present a different proposition to each other than Elcock or McDermott did.

An absolutely brilliant trade fight of the highest order.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: macklin v barker

Post by Asterix »

I want to know what Mooresy thinks. :DD
liamlion
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1954
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 09:56

Re: macklin v barker

Post by liamlion »

THEBUTCH wrote:I just pray the fight happens because, for me, these are probably the two best middleweights in the country right now and it will do the British scene the power of good to get these two meeting with the British title on the line. It doesn't get much better than this.

Both have just won in impressive fashion, but Barker and Macklin present a different proposition to each other than Elcock or McDermott did.

An absolutely brilliant trade fight of the highest order.
Exactly! Two young domestic fighters on the up... its these type of fights that makes me love the game. My absolute favourite type of boxing match.

Id take a keenly contested British title fight between two up and coming talented, evenly matched fighters everyday of the week... the WBO can fuk off!
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: macklin v barker

Post by Counter-puncher »

[quote="DuranTheGreat"]
Macklin is a SMALL Middleweight and wouldn't hurt Barker
quote]

IMO, Macklin is bigger in the ring than Barker having seen them both from up-close
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: macklin v barker

Post by Autobarn »

Barker also came up from light middle.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: macklin v barker

Post by Autobarn »

THEBUTCH wrote:I just pray the fight happens because, for me, these are probably the two best middleweights in the country right now and it will do the British scene the power of good to get these two meeting with the British title on the line. It doesn't get much better than this.

Both have just won in impressive fashion, but Barker and Macklin present a different proposition to each other than Elcock or McDermott did.

An absolutely brilliant trade fight of the highest order.
if it's only a trade fight, why would both sides risk it?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: macklin v barker

Post by Counter-puncher »

Autobarn wrote:
THEBUTCH wrote:I just pray the fight happens because, for me, these are probably the two best middleweights in the country right now and it will do the British scene the power of good to get these two meeting with the British title on the line. It doesn't get much better than this.

Both have just won in impressive fashion, but Barker and Macklin present a different proposition to each other than Elcock or McDermott did.

An absolutely brilliant trade fight of the highest order.
if it's only a trade fight, why would both sides risk it?
a bit more than just a trade fight, would be big, no huge in Birmingham, i think you can guarantee upwards of 2,500 turning out to support Macklin alone if it was held in Brum.

in terms of why would both sides risk it? on Macklin's side i think they would see it as a calculated risk. he's already lost twice so they have no 0 to protect, he's lost his cherry in that sense which is a good thing. On barker's side, Hennessy hasn't been too shy matching Froch so I don't see why he wouldn't put barker in with macklin. would barker be willing to fight away from home? because i guarantee Macklin will bring more fans to the equation, if Macca did then Macklin will for sure....
Bomber 1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1697
Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 09:44

Re: macklin v barker

Post by Bomber 1 »

If this fight happens I feel Maklins power would come to the fore front!!

If this happens in Birmingham then the atmosphere would be electric!!
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: macklin v barker

Post by Counter-puncher »

Bomber 1 wrote:
If this happens in Birmingham then the atmosphere would be electric!!
and if it happens down south the brummies will bring all the fans and noise anyway ;;-)
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: macklin v barker

Post by Dioufy »

Barker KO, but not an early one.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: macklin v barker

Post by Poncey »

I'd sell Terry dog to see this fight. However I have a feeling it never will because of politics (yet again).
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6638
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: macklin v barker

Post by THEBUTCH »

It's not 'just' a trade fight ,Autobarn, it's an absolutely brilliant trade fight of the highest order.

I seem to recall Schwer v Dunne was described as a trade fight, but as big a trade fight as they come.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: macklin v barker

Post by Autobarn »

yeah, but they had a "world" title to gain! and apprently extra money in the pot

schwer v dunne was a great fight, i agree.
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: macklin v barker

Post by Captain Hook »

Barker is a different class IMO, he wins this by late stoppage.

Macklin looked awesome last time out but he wouldn't do that to Barker
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: macklin v barker

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

As much as i like Macklin,his best win was against Elcock
Barker would have done him the same if not better
Ithink Barker would box the ears off Macklin&win easily on points or stop Macklin from the 8th onwards...
potnoodle
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 130
Joined: 08 May 2009, 08:34

Re: macklin v barker

Post by potnoodle »

Im with Barker. Really hope this fight goes a head. Great opportunities for the winner!
2458michael
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1
Joined: 26 May 2009, 16:56

Re: macklin v barker

Post by 2458michael »

ide have to go with barker on this one....different class!!!
Post Reply