Best One Loss Fighters
-
Ambling Alp
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3627
- Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31
Best One Loss Fighters
This group may be more impressive than the undefeated fighters.
Here are the most noteworthy fighters with only one official loss:
John L. Sullivan
James J. Jeffries
Gene Tunney
Packey McFarland
Salvador Sanchez
Aaron Pryor
Michael Spinks
Riddick Bowe
Khaosai Galaxy
How do you guys rate these fighters?
Here are the most noteworthy fighters with only one official loss:
John L. Sullivan
James J. Jeffries
Gene Tunney
Packey McFarland
Salvador Sanchez
Aaron Pryor
Michael Spinks
Riddick Bowe
Khaosai Galaxy
How do you guys rate these fighters?
Last edited by Ambling Alp on 28 May 2009, 13:14, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
lol i was thinking about this recently i wondered if less had retired with 1 loss than 0
Naz is another one with 1 loss
Naz is another one with 1 loss
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
McAullife (?) had only one loss if memory serves me right
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
Salvador Sanchez
-
Ambling Alp
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3627
- Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
McAulliffe was actaully undefeated.
Can't believe that I didn't think of Sanchez!
He may have been the best of them all.
Of course there are some really great fighters wih only 1 loss.
Can't believe that I didn't think of Sanchez!
Of course there are some really great fighters wih only 1 loss.
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
Aaron Pryor
-
allworld80
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3468
- Joined: 09 Dec 2006, 20:12
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
Michael Spinks
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
Seamus wrote:Aaron Pryor
.....I knew you would come up with this, I was just waiting......and sure enough.....
-
BroughtonRulesRefuge
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2770
- Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 06:55
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
- Bowe ain't in the class of all the fighters mentioned thus far.Ambling Alp wrote: How do you guys rate these fighters?
Brian Mitchell, 45-1, and Henry Maske, 31-1. Both losses avenged.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
I'd call Tunney & Sanchez the best shouts thus far.
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
Henry Maske with his clinch and run tactics? You got to be having a laugh.BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote:- Bowe ain't in the class of all the fighters mentioned thus far.Ambling Alp wrote: How do you guys rate these fighters?
Brian Mitchell, 45-1, and Henry Maske, 31-1. Both losses avenged.
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
Well at least he was less irritating than Sven Ottke...Roco wrote:Henry Maske with his clinch and run tactics? You got to be having a laugh.BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote:- Bowe ain't in the class of all the fighters mentioned thus far.Ambling Alp wrote: How do you guys rate these fighters?
Brian Mitchell, 45-1, and Henry Maske, 31-1. Both losses avenged.
-
BroughtonRulesRefuge
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2770
- Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 06:55
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
- What are you really going on about Roco?Roco wrote: Henry Maske with his clinch and run tactics? You got to be having a laugh.
Maske knocked out Barkley faster than the undefeated Toney did without needing to shrink Barkley down to a prune to do it. Ice John Scully rated Maske very highly for his defense and overall abilities.
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
Both were corner retirements after nine rounds.BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote: Maske knocked out Barkley faster than the undefeated Toney did
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
wouter wrote:Both were corner retirements after nine rounds.BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote: Maske knocked out Barkley faster than the undefeated Toney did
you were saying, BRR?
owned
-
Roars Like Me
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1763
- Joined: 14 Feb 2006, 10:43
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
Top drawer choice therebjermaine wrote:Salvador Sanchez
-
BroughtonRulesRefuge
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2770
- Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 06:55
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
- Not to put too fine a pedantic point on it, but both IBF title fights contested a year apart featuring Barkley's retirement.Counter-puncher wrote:wouter wrote:Both were corner retirements after nine rounds.BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote: Maske knocked out Barkley faster than the undefeated Toney did![]()
you were saying, BRR?
owned
Boxrec lists Maske as a 9 rd stoppage, and Toney as a 10 rd stoppage, an indication of highly technical details only known to boxing experts who combine rocket science with tea leaves to deign the final official result subject to commission overrulings and boxrec editing in perpetuity............. 8)
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
- Not to put too fine a pedantic point on it, but both IBF title fights contested a year apart featuring Barkley's retirement.BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote:wouter wrote:Both were corner retirements after nine rounds.BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote: Maske knocked out Barkley faster than the undefeated Toney did![]()
you were saying, BRR?
owned
Boxrec lists Maske as a 9 rd stoppage, and Toney as a 10 rd stoppage, an indication of highly technical details only known to boxing experts who combine rocket science with tea leaves to deign the final official result subject to commission overrulings and boxrec editing in perpetuity............. 8)[/quote]
In other words, you didn't actually see the fight . . . 8)
-
BroughtonRulesRefuge
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2770
- Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 06:55
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
- In other words, you can't actually see the official results hinge on other factors. Typical myopic reaction you exhibit.dempseyfire wrote: In other words, you didn't actually see the fight . . . 8)
-
Ambling Alp
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3627
- Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
I think it comes down to Tunney,Sanchez, and Spinks.
All beat several really good fighters.
Jeffries isn't too far behind. He didn't have a lot of fights, but beat some really good competition as well. His loss was after a long layoff.
All beat several really good fighters.
Jeffries isn't too far behind. He didn't have a lot of fights, but beat some really good competition as well. His loss was after a long layoff.
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
Do you even know what myopic means? Sure official results can hinge on various factors, but that doesn't change the fact you simply looked up the results on boxrec and thought you were being clever, wheareas you clearly have not seen Maske-Barkely!BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote:- In other words, you can't actually see the official results hinge on other factors. Typical myopic reaction you exhibit.dempseyfire wrote: In other words, you didn't actually see the fight . . . 8)
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
Micael Spinks, Tunney and Naz stand out the most imo
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
Exactly.dempseyfire wrote:In other words, you didn't actually see the fight . . . 8)BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote:- Not to put too fine a pedantic point on it, but both IBF title fights contested a year apart featuring Barkley's retirement.
Boxrec lists Maske as a 9 rd stoppage, and Toney as a 10 rd stoppage, an indication of highly technical details only known to boxing experts who combine rocket science with tea leaves to deign the final official result subject to commission overrulings and boxrec editing in perpetuity............. 8)
-
BroughtonRulesRefuge
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2770
- Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 06:55
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
- And what has this to do with the price of puppies in China?dempseyfire wrote: Sure official results can hinge on various factors, but that doesn't change the fact you simply looked up the results on boxrec and thought you were being clever, wheareas you clearly have not seen Maske-Barkely!
No need for me to be clever when you've got your little puppy Colly still following me around wagging his tail in spite of having me on "ignore." There is not a single person who posts on this board who can tell us off hand what the round and official results were in many bouts they have seen except the obvious classics that stand out in memory.
Henry Maske was obviously a fine fighter with a better record than most and he met the thread criteria, so I included him. That you and little Colly don't care for him is no surprise, but it's telling that you'd rather talk about me rather than boxing, probably because you don't know the first thing about boxing.
Facts are Maske KOed Barkley without needing to dry him out into a prune like Toney did. Had Toney showed up instead, he'd get turned into a well marbled rump roast as we saw when he was run out of super mid by Jones and his own appetite and failed to handle the LH division save a few clubfighters.
Re: Best One Loss Fighters
can we inclde Vic darchinyan for now?
