Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by Poncey »

Can Bobby Gunn drain in time.
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by The Law »

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Can Bobby Gunn drain in time.
:lol:
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by whicker »

GazMan85 wrote:
I'm thinking a late replacement.
It's 2 weeks notice - who, realistically, would be available?
dazzer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 280
Joined: 11 Apr 2009, 17:07

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by dazzer »

i was thinking the other day, sky have not really done alot of promotion for this fight, they always try to sell khan nearly 2 months before, his fight now 2 weeks before and i have still not seen an advert for the fight.

could it be it is a big arena, and not many tix sold, £40 to sit up in the gods ?
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by m1kee50 »

ESPN mentions Lamont Peterson.... some thoughts.... too big a fight for a replacement, Peterson can punch a bit/
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28506
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by Coco »

So Khan will win a world title the vacant/interim route against a short notice sub
I bet my mortgage it will be a super feather
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Lamont might beat him. I see him as the lesser of the two Peterson's.

Might be worth picking up a bargain ticket.
yeah anthony is better.

lamont is good though.

stupid matchmaking from warren if he goes for it. :o
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by sweetscience »

hitman_hatton1 wrote:
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Lamont might beat him. I see him as the lesser of the two Peterson's.

Might be worth picking up a bargain ticket.
yeah anthony is better.

lamont is good though.

stupid matchmaking from warren if he goes for it. :o
i think they will postpone, remember what happened with the last last minute replacement
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by crusader »

If they take Peterson on short notice the better hope he is out of shape and off his game. The big speed advantage Khan had against Kotelnik will be much less of a factor and Peterson probably hits harder or at worst, just as had as Kotelnik.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28506
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by Coco »

Expect Alex Arthur to be a late arrival in the WBA l/w ratings
Grilling Machine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3160
Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by Grilling Machine »

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Can Bobby Gunn drain in time.
Can Matlala do the pies?

Teeth are a lottery pain-wise. Of the four wisdom teeth I've had taken three were fine but one was agony. I didn't even go jogging for a fortnight after because I was afraid of upsetting it.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by Spud »

What really p*sses me off about this is on teletext or somewhere I read that a Frank W arren spokesperson has been quoted as stating "we are trying to establish the situation" - in my opinion they already know and yet again this is a situation where tickets are being sold and if there is something that effects that show then the information should be given to the fans IMMEDIATELY.

I could go into a rant but wont - other than to say - a certain promoter and this sort of situation is not uncommon when you look back over the last few years.
REAL_DEAL
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5030
Joined: 09 Jul 2003, 06:42

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by REAL_DEAL »

whats bradley prescott weight at :confused:
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by Spud »

Exactly Mr Real Deal - there are plenty of opponents out there - but expect to be dissapointed.
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by The Law »

hitman_hatton1 wrote:
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Lamont might beat him. I see him as the lesser of the two Peterson's.

Might be worth picking up a bargain ticket.
yeah anthony is better.

lamont is good though.

stupid matchmaking from warren if he goes for it. :o
I personally think Lamont is technically a better boxer than his brother, but Anthony punches harder.
liamlion
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1956
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 09:56

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by liamlion »

Is Derek Chisora still on the bill?

I know he got banned, its just his name is still appearing in certain London newspapers as appearing on the bill. Clearly if he isnt, then fwank should be making efforts to amend the fight poster.
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by The Law »

liamlion wrote:Is Derek Chisora still on the bill?

I know he got banned, its just his name is still appearing in certain London newspapers as appearing on the bill. Clearly if he isnt, then fwank should be making efforts to amend the fight poster.
Derek is definitely not on the bill.
WildWaylon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3223
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by WildWaylon »

The whole event needs cacelling then. Surely it wont go ahead with Khan fighting a bum who has no chance of winning.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by Horse »

WildWaylon wrote:The whole event needs cacelling then. Surely it wont go ahead with Khan fighting a bum who has no chance of winning.
Since when is Khan fighting a bum who has no chance of winning?
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27508
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by stujones »

There is NO way Khan should be fighting for a vacant/interim championship... doesn't he have to be mandatory first.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by Wales »

Ortiz fighting for interim WBA on the 27th, Sky should add this card to the PPV (juarez john on the undercard).

Is the bill advertised as "world championship boxing" - If so are there any world title fights on the bill aside form Khan Kotelnik, surely ticket refunds will be applicable if not.
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

The Law wrote:I personally think Lamont is technically a better boxer than his brother, but Anthony punches harder.
i disagree with that.

i think lamont is a bit more rough and ready.

anthony is more technical stand up boxer.

bit more to his game.

both good though.

too good for khan anyway. :box:
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by The Law »

hitman_hatton1 wrote:
The Law wrote:I personally think Lamont is technically a better boxer than his brother, but Anthony punches harder.
i disagree with that.

i think lamont is a bit more rough and ready.

anthony is more technical stand up boxer.

bit more to his game.

both good though.

too good for khan anyway. :box:
I've always considered Lamont as the more slick boxer out of the two (eventhough they are both pretty slick).
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by leforge »

Fight now on July 18th according to sky sports new.
lirva
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????

Post by lirva »

leforge wrote:Fight now on July 18th according to sky sports new.
Good news. So the June 20 show is scrapped completely then?
Post Reply