Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Can Bobby Gunn drain in time.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Can Bobby Gunn drain in time.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
It's 2 weeks notice - who, realistically, would be available?GazMan85 wrote:
I'm thinking a late replacement.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
i was thinking the other day, sky have not really done alot of promotion for this fight, they always try to sell khan nearly 2 months before, his fight now 2 weeks before and i have still not seen an advert for the fight.
could it be it is a big arena, and not many tix sold, £40 to sit up in the gods ?
could it be it is a big arena, and not many tix sold, £40 to sit up in the gods ?
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
ESPN mentions Lamont Peterson.... some thoughts.... too big a fight for a replacement, Peterson can punch a bit/
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
So Khan will win a world title the vacant/interim route against a short notice sub
I bet my mortgage it will be a super feather
I bet my mortgage it will be a super feather
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
yeah anthony is better.Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Lamont might beat him. I see him as the lesser of the two Peterson's.
Might be worth picking up a bargain ticket.
lamont is good though.
stupid matchmaking from warren if he goes for it.
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
i think they will postpone, remember what happened with the last last minute replacementhitman_hatton1 wrote:yeah anthony is better.Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Lamont might beat him. I see him as the lesser of the two Peterson's.
Might be worth picking up a bargain ticket.
lamont is good though.
stupid matchmaking from warren if he goes for it.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
If they take Peterson on short notice the better hope he is out of shape and off his game. The big speed advantage Khan had against Kotelnik will be much less of a factor and Peterson probably hits harder or at worst, just as had as Kotelnik.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Expect Alex Arthur to be a late arrival in the WBA l/w ratings
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3160
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Can Matlala do the pies?Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Can Bobby Gunn drain in time.
Teeth are a lottery pain-wise. Of the four wisdom teeth I've had taken three were fine but one was agony. I didn't even go jogging for a fortnight after because I was afraid of upsetting it.
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
What really p*sses me off about this is on teletext or somewhere I read that a Frank W arren spokesperson has been quoted as stating "we are trying to establish the situation" - in my opinion they already know and yet again this is a situation where tickets are being sold and if there is something that effects that show then the information should be given to the fans IMMEDIATELY.
I could go into a rant but wont - other than to say - a certain promoter and this sort of situation is not uncommon when you look back over the last few years.
I could go into a rant but wont - other than to say - a certain promoter and this sort of situation is not uncommon when you look back over the last few years.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
whats bradley prescott weight at ![[icon_e_confused.gif] :confused:](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Exactly Mr Real Deal - there are plenty of opponents out there - but expect to be dissapointed.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
I personally think Lamont is technically a better boxer than his brother, but Anthony punches harder.hitman_hatton1 wrote:yeah anthony is better.Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Lamont might beat him. I see him as the lesser of the two Peterson's.
Might be worth picking up a bargain ticket.
lamont is good though.
stupid matchmaking from warren if he goes for it.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Is Derek Chisora still on the bill?
I know he got banned, its just his name is still appearing in certain London newspapers as appearing on the bill. Clearly if he isnt, then fwank should be making efforts to amend the fight poster.
I know he got banned, its just his name is still appearing in certain London newspapers as appearing on the bill. Clearly if he isnt, then fwank should be making efforts to amend the fight poster.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Derek is definitely not on the bill.liamlion wrote:Is Derek Chisora still on the bill?
I know he got banned, its just his name is still appearing in certain London newspapers as appearing on the bill. Clearly if he isnt, then fwank should be making efforts to amend the fight poster.
-
WildWaylon
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3223
- Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
The whole event needs cacelling then. Surely it wont go ahead with Khan fighting a bum who has no chance of winning.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Since when is Khan fighting a bum who has no chance of winning?WildWaylon wrote:The whole event needs cacelling then. Surely it wont go ahead with Khan fighting a bum who has no chance of winning.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
There is NO way Khan should be fighting for a vacant/interim championship... doesn't he have to be mandatory first.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Ortiz fighting for interim WBA on the 27th, Sky should add this card to the PPV (juarez john on the undercard).
Is the bill advertised as "world championship boxing" - If so are there any world title fights on the bill aside form Khan Kotelnik, surely ticket refunds will be applicable if not.
Is the bill advertised as "world championship boxing" - If so are there any world title fights on the bill aside form Khan Kotelnik, surely ticket refunds will be applicable if not.
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
i disagree with that.The Law wrote:I personally think Lamont is technically a better boxer than his brother, but Anthony punches harder.
i think lamont is a bit more rough and ready.
anthony is more technical stand up boxer.
bit more to his game.
both good though.
too good for khan anyway.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
I've always considered Lamont as the more slick boxer out of the two (eventhough they are both pretty slick).hitman_hatton1 wrote:i disagree with that.The Law wrote:I personally think Lamont is technically a better boxer than his brother, but Anthony punches harder.
i think lamont is a bit more rough and ready.
anthony is more technical stand up boxer.
bit more to his game.
both good though.
too good for khan anyway.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Fight now on July 18th according to sky sports new.
-
lirva
- Heavyweight

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Good news. So the June 20 show is scrapped completely then?leforge wrote:Fight now on July 18th according to sky sports new.