Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
-
scrap iron
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 407
- Joined: 02 Jan 2007, 17:38
Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
Good fight this and hopefully it will last a few more rounds then Brook's last two British title fights.
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
turning out to be a pretty good card glad its been moved to manchester
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
Lomax is tough but can see Brook winning this...
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
is there any tickets left for this bill?
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
Kell should beat Lomax, but I can't help thinking, why didn't Kell fighting Lomax instead of the army guy who was useless?
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
emma wrote:is there any tickets left for this bill?
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
fck me I didn't know it had been moved or I'd have gone if I wasn't on holiday.
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
No it wontscrap iron wrote:Good fight this and hopefully it will last a few more rounds then Brook's last two British title fights.
-
alexpaterson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4310
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
Good fight for Brook think Lomax may take him a few rounds would be very surprised if Brook never won this fight though
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
Will they show all of these fights on the PPV?
This is a better fight than most Friday Fight Night cards have. Why do they need to save all of their decent fights for PPV?
This is a better fight than most Friday Fight Night cards have. Why do they need to save all of their decent fights for PPV?
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
chinny wrote:emma wrote:is there any tickets left for this bill?surprise surprise
oh shut up.
-
celerygolf
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 122
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 10:59
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
Lomax will win this on points and shock all the kell brook arse lickers. If he manages to stop getting cut I can see lomax frustrating brook and will run out of juice in middle rounds. Lomax has got a good chin and won't fold up like an ha'penny comic. Sources say brook isn't a great trainer and fitness may play a part.
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
I know you're probably one of his pals but why won't it go longer? You seen Lomax box?SOUTHPAW wrote:No it wontscrap iron wrote:Good fight this and hopefully it will last a few more rounds then Brook's last two British title fights.
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
Hope that this card stays intack, as it looks bloody amazing.
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
It seems that Warren's matchmaker Dean Powell asked Matthew Brook and Matthew accepted.
Next thing then is Warren's people wanted options on Matthew Hatton and Matthew wouldn't give him options. I suppose Matthew saw what Warren was like with Ricky and thought better. So No Brook v Hatton.
I mention this only because it seems that if you don't give options with Brook you don't fight him. Thus Warren always keeps the winner. an old trick, I know, but if Warren was that confident about Brook being the next big thing he would take chances and give the Manchester people a chance to see another Hatton have a crack at the British title.
pablo
Next thing then is Warren's people wanted options on Matthew Hatton and Matthew wouldn't give him options. I suppose Matthew saw what Warren was like with Ricky and thought better. So No Brook v Hatton.
I mention this only because it seems that if you don't give options with Brook you don't fight him. Thus Warren always keeps the winner. an old trick, I know, but if Warren was that confident about Brook being the next big thing he would take chances and give the Manchester people a chance to see another Hatton have a crack at the British title.
pablo
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
Yep a few time i thought he was lucky in prizefighter against Nigel Wright and he is really only a light-welter and i dont think he has the power to keep Kell off i really think it will be a quick fightCaptain Hook wrote:I know you're probably one of his pals but why won't it go longer? You seen Lomax box?SOUTHPAW wrote:No it wontscrap iron wrote:Good fight this and hopefully it will last a few more rounds then Brook's last two British title fights.
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
lomax is amuch better challenger than i thought brook would face,so i mhappy about this
-
Contender1980
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3
- Joined: 22 Jun 2009, 04:39
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
No luck about it - Nigel Wright is just a sore loser.[/quote]
-
celerygolf
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 122
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 10:59
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
Michael lomax is really a light welterweight!!!!!
What a ridiculous comment. No one would fight him at welterweight so he dropped down to light welter and took a fight with craig Watson at two weeks notice and was totally drained at the weight.
He would never fight at light welter again.
Fact!!
What a ridiculous comment. No one would fight him at welterweight so he dropped down to light welter and took a fight with craig Watson at two weeks notice and was totally drained at the weight.
He would never fight at light welter again.
Fact!!
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
celerygolf wrote:Michael lomax is really a light welterweight!!!!!
What a ridiculous comment. No one would fight him at welterweight so he dropped down to light welter and took a fight with craig Watson at two weeks notice and was totally drained at the weight.
He would never fight at light welter again.
Fact!!
yep spot on comment mate
-
Contender1980
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3
- Joined: 22 Jun 2009, 04:39
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
Totally right mate - he is too tall to be a light welter weight - he looked gaunt fighting at that weight.
He is a natural welterweight.
He is a natural welterweight.
-
xXHAMMERXx
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 159
- Joined: 09 Jan 2009, 16:33
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
lomax got smashed when he fort watson an that was the last fight watson had a light welter so they was both stuglling at the weight i would like to see them fight again but to be honist i think watson would stop him the second time round he had to much work rate for him ...
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
I am no Kel Brook arse licker but he whips your man and looks good in doing so - and as for your sources get on your hands and knees and start praying they are right.celerygolf wrote:Lomax will win this on points and shock all the kell brook arse lickers. If he manages to stop getting cut I can see lomax frustrating brook and will run out of juice in middle rounds. Lomax has got a good chin and won't fold up like an ha'penny comic. Sources say brook isn't a great trainer and fitness may play a part.
Your man is in a whole heap of sh*t!!!
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
Celery,
Kel is bang on the money in terms of fitness and application, which sadly bodes badly for your man.
I will be shocked if Brook is extended beyond 5 rounds in this contest.
Your sources dont seem too reliable mate.
Kel is bang on the money in terms of fitness and application, which sadly bodes badly for your man.
I will be shocked if Brook is extended beyond 5 rounds in this contest.
Your sources dont seem too reliable mate.
Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card
Any odds on this? I can find any, which concerns me a little.