Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

scrap iron
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 407
Joined: 02 Jan 2007, 17:38

Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by scrap iron »

Good fight this and hopefully it will last a few more rounds then Brook's last two British title fights.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by 15829 »

turning out to be a pretty good card glad its been moved to manchester
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by Captain Hook »

Lomax is tough but can see Brook winning this...
emma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1421
Joined: 20 Mar 2006, 12:28

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by emma »

is there any tickets left for this bill?
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by Dioufy »

Kell should beat Lomax, but I can't help thinking, why didn't Kell fighting Lomax instead of the army guy who was useless?
chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by chinny »

emma wrote:is there any tickets left for this bill?
:lol: surprise surprise
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by n1ebf »

fck me I didn't know it had been moved or I'd have gone if I wasn't on holiday.
SOUTHPAW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 331
Joined: 24 Jun 2008, 17:40

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by SOUTHPAW »

scrap iron wrote:Good fight this and hopefully it will last a few more rounds then Brook's last two British title fights.
No it wont
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by alexpaterson »

Good fight for Brook think Lomax may take him a few rounds would be very surprised if Brook never won this fight though
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by Horse »

Will they show all of these fights on the PPV?

This is a better fight than most Friday Fight Night cards have. Why do they need to save all of their decent fights for PPV?
emma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1421
Joined: 20 Mar 2006, 12:28

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by emma »

chinny wrote:
emma wrote:is there any tickets left for this bill?
:lol: surprise surprise

oh shut up. :lol:
celerygolf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 122
Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 10:59

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by celerygolf »

Lomax will win this on points and shock all the kell brook arse lickers. If he manages to stop getting cut I can see lomax frustrating brook and will run out of juice in middle rounds. Lomax has got a good chin and won't fold up like an ha'penny comic. Sources say brook isn't a great trainer and fitness may play a part.
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by Captain Hook »

SOUTHPAW wrote:
scrap iron wrote:Good fight this and hopefully it will last a few more rounds then Brook's last two British title fights.
No it wont
I know you're probably one of his pals but why won't it go longer? You seen Lomax box?
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by whicker »

Hope that this card stays intack, as it looks bloody amazing.
pablo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22
Joined: 18 May 2009, 18:09

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by pablo »

It seems that Warren's matchmaker Dean Powell asked Matthew Brook and Matthew accepted.

Next thing then is Warren's people wanted options on Matthew Hatton and Matthew wouldn't give him options. I suppose Matthew saw what Warren was like with Ricky and thought better. So No Brook v Hatton.

I mention this only because it seems that if you don't give options with Brook you don't fight him. Thus Warren always keeps the winner. an old trick, I know, but if Warren was that confident about Brook being the next big thing he would take chances and give the Manchester people a chance to see another Hatton have a crack at the British title.

pablo
SOUTHPAW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 331
Joined: 24 Jun 2008, 17:40

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by SOUTHPAW »

Captain Hook wrote:
SOUTHPAW wrote:
scrap iron wrote:Good fight this and hopefully it will last a few more rounds then Brook's last two British title fights.
No it wont
I know you're probably one of his pals but why won't it go longer? You seen Lomax box?
Yep a few time i thought he was lucky in prizefighter against Nigel Wright and he is really only a light-welter and i dont think he has the power to keep Kell off i really think it will be a quick fight
caffrey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 379
Joined: 16 Sep 2008, 15:52

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by caffrey »

lomax is amuch better challenger than i thought brook would face,so i mhappy about this
Contender1980
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3
Joined: 22 Jun 2009, 04:39

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by Contender1980 »

No luck about it - Nigel Wright is just a sore loser.[/quote]
celerygolf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 122
Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 10:59

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by celerygolf »

Michael lomax is really a light welterweight!!!!!
What a ridiculous comment. No one would fight him at welterweight so he dropped down to light welter and took a fight with craig Watson at two weeks notice and was totally drained at the weight.

He would never fight at light welter again.

Fact!!
caffrey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 379
Joined: 16 Sep 2008, 15:52

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by caffrey »

celerygolf wrote:Michael lomax is really a light welterweight!!!!!
What a ridiculous comment. No one would fight him at welterweight so he dropped down to light welter and took a fight with craig Watson at two weeks notice and was totally drained at the weight.

He would never fight at light welter again.

Fact!!

yep spot on comment mate
Contender1980
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3
Joined: 22 Jun 2009, 04:39

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by Contender1980 »

Totally right mate - he is too tall to be a light welter weight - he looked gaunt fighting at that weight.

He is a natural welterweight.
xXHAMMERXx
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 159
Joined: 09 Jan 2009, 16:33

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by xXHAMMERXx »

lomax got smashed when he fort watson an that was the last fight watson had a light welter so they was both stuglling at the weight i would like to see them fight again but to be honist i think watson would stop him the second time round he had to much work rate for him ...
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by Spud »

celerygolf wrote:Lomax will win this on points and shock all the kell brook arse lickers. If he manages to stop getting cut I can see lomax frustrating brook and will run out of juice in middle rounds. Lomax has got a good chin and won't fold up like an ha'penny comic. Sources say brook isn't a great trainer and fitness may play a part.
I am no Kel Brook arse licker but he whips your man and looks good in doing so - and as for your sources get on your hands and knees and start praying they are right.

Your man is in a whole heap of sh*t!!!
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by twenty six »

Celery,
Kel is bang on the money in terms of fitness and application, which sadly bodes badly for your man.
I will be shocked if Brook is extended beyond 5 rounds in this contest.
Your sources dont seem too reliable mate.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by whicker »

Any odds on this? I can find any, which concerns me a little.
Post Reply