Macklin vs Barker

Matthew Macklin vs Darren Barker

Darren Barker
45
60%
Matthew Macklin
30
40%
 
Total votes: 75

Corizmo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 13:49

Macklin vs Barker

Post by Corizmo »

Who would win between the two best middleweights in britain ?
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by Autobarn »

will it happen?

warren fighters often get big opportunities, sometimes are pulled out of purse bids.
just think: there are 2 massive middleweights holding titles, and one has already decided to move up.

who gets ranked quicker: warren fighters or other fighters?
caffrey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 379
Joined: 16 Sep 2008, 15:52

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by caffrey »

it would be a geuine 50/50 cracker im slightly leaning towards barker but rate macklin aswell.id definetly travel from wales to see this if it ever happens
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by sweetscience »

its a Hatton fighter vs a Hennessey fighter now
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by Autobarn »

macklin gone with hatton?
chris s
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 02 Jun 2004, 08:56

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by chris s »

I think the purse bids are some time this month. Be a real needle match as Hennessy and his team have little time for Macklin
Beeston
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 20
Joined: 12 May 2009, 05:41

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by Beeston »

Macklin wins this.

I feel both have been held back something stupid by negative promoters, and ought to be eyeing EBU title shots atm.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by 15829 »

think barker on points i reckon barker will improve every time he fights someone who is dangerous
whiteboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 19:48

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by whiteboy »

Autobarn wrote:macklin gone with hatton?
so, just when i start to look forward to seeing FW put Macklin, Broadhurst & Gavin on bills in Birmingham, Macklin signs with Hatton :roll:
charlieb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1014
Joined: 01 May 2005, 10:58

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by charlieb »

I dont rate Macklin at all.

Barker, probably by KO.
Londonirish
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3064
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by Londonirish »

whiteboy wrote:
Autobarn wrote:macklin gone with hatton?
so, just when i start to look forward to seeing FW put Macklin, Broadhurst & Gavin on bills in Birmingham, Macklin signs with Hatton :roll:


Yep your right :x
caffrey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 379
Joined: 16 Sep 2008, 15:52

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by caffrey »

diggler wrote:think barker on points i reckon barker will improve every time he fights someone who is dangerous
i agree i believe hes the best middleweight we ve had for a long time.i reckon he would have given a prime howard eastmen fits for sure.Macklin is certainly no mug either definetly at least EBU level
moorser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 215
Joined: 20 Jan 2009, 18:17

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by moorser »

macklin by ko , too big too strong , looked devastating in his last fight and barker has been fighting bad calibre of fighters imo , hasnt proved himself at all yet
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by Autobarn »

i was sold on barker but the opposition hasn't significantly improved from the bendall fight. bendall, larry sharpe, jason mckay and john mcdermott. don't mean to be rude but that's not exactly a murderer's row. barker is good but i think if he's going to get beaten, it'll be by stoppage by a pressure fighter. macklin has come on well. is macklin not fighting facey now? facey rematch would make clear how much he's improved and if he can concentrate for long periods.
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

definitely barker for me.

better skills than macklin. :box:

be well surprised if macklin won this one.
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by Captain Hook »

Barker, possibly late KO but more likely a hard fought points win with Macklin starting the better.

Real belter this one, can't wait....
lirva
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by lirva »

Barker will easily outbox the slugger.
caffrey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 379
Joined: 16 Sep 2008, 15:52

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by caffrey »

lirva wrote:Barker will easily outbox the slugger.
macklins underated as a boxer although if macklin does win it wont be on points
lirva
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by lirva »

caffrey wrote:
lirva wrote:Barker will easily outbox the slugger.
macklins underated as a boxer although if macklin does win it wont be on points
Macklin is actually severely limited and got outboxed by "smiley" facey if you recall. without his power he'd be nothing.
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by Captain Hook »

lirva wrote:
caffrey wrote:
lirva wrote:Barker will easily outbox the slugger.
macklins underated as a boxer although if macklin does win it wont be on points
Macklin is actually severely limited and got outboxed by "smiley" facey if you recall. without his power he'd be nothing.
That's a bit harsh, he's not as stylish as Barker or as technically sound, but he's no mug.
Bomber 1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1697
Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 09:44

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by Bomber 1 »

moorser wrote:macklin by ko , too big too strong , looked devastating in his last fight and barker has been fighting bad calibre of fighters imo , hasnt proved himself at all yet

I agree with this BUT I think Maklin will lose the first 3 or 4 rounds and then come from behind to stop him!! :wink:
neil hibbert
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 747
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:36

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by neil hibbert »

good 50/50 fight, thnk macklin stoppage in the later rounds
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by Counter-puncher »

whiteboy wrote:
Autobarn wrote:macklin gone with hatton?
so, just when i start to look forward to seeing FW put Macklin, Broadhurst & Gavin on bills in Birmingham, Macklin signs with Hatton :roll:
x3
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by Dioufy »

It's Barker's acid-test at domestic level, but I really like him (not in a gay way), so I am going with him via KO around the midway point. Too fast, too accurate and deceptively hard-hitting. Also got a good workrate. If Macklin wins then I will be surprised. I will also be made to eat humble pie.
levi billups
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 89
Joined: 07 Jun 2008, 11:29

Re: Macklin vs Barker

Post by levi billups »

Barker to win by late TKO after absorbing early pressure from Macklin. I just hope this fight happens, it would be a shame if it didn't come off.
Post Reply