Macklin vs Barker
Macklin vs Barker
Who would win between the two best middleweights in britain ?
Re: Macklin vs Barker
will it happen?
warren fighters often get big opportunities, sometimes are pulled out of purse bids.
just think: there are 2 massive middleweights holding titles, and one has already decided to move up.
who gets ranked quicker: warren fighters or other fighters?
warren fighters often get big opportunities, sometimes are pulled out of purse bids.
just think: there are 2 massive middleweights holding titles, and one has already decided to move up.
who gets ranked quicker: warren fighters or other fighters?
Re: Macklin vs Barker
it would be a geuine 50/50 cracker im slightly leaning towards barker but rate macklin aswell.id definetly travel from wales to see this if it ever happens
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: Macklin vs Barker
its a Hatton fighter vs a Hennessey fighter now
Re: Macklin vs Barker
macklin gone with hatton?
Re: Macklin vs Barker
I think the purse bids are some time this month. Be a real needle match as Hennessy and his team have little time for Macklin
Re: Macklin vs Barker
Macklin wins this.
I feel both have been held back something stupid by negative promoters, and ought to be eyeing EBU title shots atm.
I feel both have been held back something stupid by negative promoters, and ought to be eyeing EBU title shots atm.
Re: Macklin vs Barker
think barker on points i reckon barker will improve every time he fights someone who is dangerous
Re: Macklin vs Barker
so, just when i start to look forward to seeing FW put Macklin, Broadhurst & Gavin on bills in Birmingham, Macklin signs with HattonAutobarn wrote:macklin gone with hatton?
Re: Macklin vs Barker
I dont rate Macklin at all.
Barker, probably by KO.
Barker, probably by KO.
-
Londonirish
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3064
- Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02
Re: Macklin vs Barker
whiteboy wrote:so, just when i start to look forward to seeing FW put Macklin, Broadhurst & Gavin on bills in Birmingham, Macklin signs with HattonAutobarn wrote:macklin gone with hatton?
Yep your right :x
Re: Macklin vs Barker
i agree i believe hes the best middleweight we ve had for a long time.i reckon he would have given a prime howard eastmen fits for sure.Macklin is certainly no mug either definetly at least EBU leveldiggler wrote:think barker on points i reckon barker will improve every time he fights someone who is dangerous
Re: Macklin vs Barker
macklin by ko , too big too strong , looked devastating in his last fight and barker has been fighting bad calibre of fighters imo , hasnt proved himself at all yet
Re: Macklin vs Barker
i was sold on barker but the opposition hasn't significantly improved from the bendall fight. bendall, larry sharpe, jason mckay and john mcdermott. don't mean to be rude but that's not exactly a murderer's row. barker is good but i think if he's going to get beaten, it'll be by stoppage by a pressure fighter. macklin has come on well. is macklin not fighting facey now? facey rematch would make clear how much he's improved and if he can concentrate for long periods.
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
Re: Macklin vs Barker
definitely barker for me.
better skills than macklin.
be well surprised if macklin won this one.
better skills than macklin.
be well surprised if macklin won this one.
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Macklin vs Barker
Barker, possibly late KO but more likely a hard fought points win with Macklin starting the better.
Real belter this one, can't wait....
Real belter this one, can't wait....
Re: Macklin vs Barker
macklins underated as a boxer although if macklin does win it wont be on pointslirva wrote:Barker will easily outbox the slugger.
-
lirva
- Heavyweight

Re: Macklin vs Barker
Macklin is actually severely limited and got outboxed by "smiley" facey if you recall. without his power he'd be nothing.caffrey wrote:macklins underated as a boxer although if macklin does win it wont be on pointslirva wrote:Barker will easily outbox the slugger.
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Macklin vs Barker
That's a bit harsh, he's not as stylish as Barker or as technically sound, but he's no mug.lirva wrote:Macklin is actually severely limited and got outboxed by "smiley" facey if you recall. without his power he'd be nothing.caffrey wrote:macklins underated as a boxer although if macklin does win it wont be on pointslirva wrote:Barker will easily outbox the slugger.
Re: Macklin vs Barker
moorser wrote:macklin by ko , too big too strong , looked devastating in his last fight and barker has been fighting bad calibre of fighters imo , hasnt proved himself at all yet
I agree with this BUT I think Maklin will lose the first 3 or 4 rounds and then come from behind to stop him!!
-
neil hibbert
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 747
- Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:36
Re: Macklin vs Barker
good 50/50 fight, thnk macklin stoppage in the later rounds
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Macklin vs Barker
x3whiteboy wrote:so, just when i start to look forward to seeing FW put Macklin, Broadhurst & Gavin on bills in Birmingham, Macklin signs with HattonAutobarn wrote:macklin gone with hatton?
Re: Macklin vs Barker
It's Barker's acid-test at domestic level, but I really like him (not in a gay way), so I am going with him via KO around the midway point. Too fast, too accurate and deceptively hard-hitting. Also got a good workrate. If Macklin wins then I will be surprised. I will also be made to eat humble pie.
-
levi billups
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 89
- Joined: 07 Jun 2008, 11:29
Re: Macklin vs Barker
Barker to win by late TKO after absorbing early pressure from Macklin. I just hope this fight happens, it would be a shame if it didn't come off.