Glenn McCrory Vs Enzo, Haye, Nelson & Thompson etc

Post Reply
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Glenn McCrory Vs Enzo, Haye, Nelson & Thompson etc

Post by KOJOE90 »

With all the Cruiserweight action going on in the UK at the moment and with the recent lifting of the Cruiserweight limit It got me thinking about how the UK's first Cruiserweight World Champion would have faired against our current Cruisers.

I'm thinking of the 1989 version of Glenn McCrory who won the IBF World title from Patrick Lamumba and not the small Heavyweight he started his career as. But to be fair even as a small Heavy it took good British/Euro level fighter to beat him such as Currie, Ecklund and the late Rudi Pika.

I only saw Glen at Cruiser twice when winning and defending his IBF title that Holyfield had vacated. From what I remember he was a good 'box fighter' type, Had reasonable stamina and good all round technical skills, not a big puncher but had enough power to get his opponents respect. He was a good allrounder without being great at any one thing.

His one major weakness was making the old Cruiser limit, he lost his title to a brutal body shot when very very tight at the weight, so the new higher limit would have suited him much more.

So, how do you guys think the 1989 Glenn McCrory would have faired had he been active today? I think many of them are hard to call to be honest for various reasons, but I will have a go.

Nelson would I believe be too fast and tricky for him and IMO would have outpointed Glen.

Thompson is always dangerous as we know but I see Glen being able to avoid the big Cat bombs to outpoint or maybe stop Thompson late on.

Enzo, going by his last to fights I will go for the more experienced McCrory to have too much and to win on points.

Haye, Tough one to call as we still don't know how good Haye really is. So I edge towards Glen, but may change my mind after the Thopson fight.

Mark Hobson, this would IMO be a good fight but go for a McCrory points win.

What do you thing fight fans? :TU:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

I think if the Glenn McCory of 1989 fighting at 14st 4 (or with today's dietary knowledge) I would have taken them all to be honest. The only one I wouldn't like to call is Haye, for the reasons you pointed out.

I just think he would be able to out work Nelson, he wouldn't be content with being mesmorised by Nelson's jab. For a world champion, Nelson's title defences have been against poor opposition. Even after all these years, I'm still not sure how good Nelson really is. First we had those "inexperience" struggles with Warring and De Leon, but even as a champion and changed fighter - the 3 most recognisable names on his resume (worldwide) gave him all kinds of problems, whether he admits it or not (Jones, Sellars and Dominguez). McCory was considerably better than these.

I think he has the power to KO Thomspon, and I'm not sure even the Thompson would find a way to get to him - he wouldn't have made the careless error that Rothman did.

I think his experience, stamina and superior durability would have put paid to Enzo's chances and I think he would just be that little to good for Hobson.
knowall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7
Joined: 02 Sep 2004, 11:05

Post by knowall »

McCory had no bottle as a fighter simple as that,now all he has is a cocaine problem dont expect to see him on sky much longer
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Post by dondada »

knowall wrote:McCory had no bottle as a fighter simple as that,now all he has is a cocaine problem dont expect to see him on sky much longer
Welcome to the forum. Get off the fence, FFS. And be careful...libel has been known to be followed up on here.

On the contrary, McCrory showed considerable bottle coming back from two heavy defeats by now promoter Dave Garside and Hughroy Currie (who would have beaten most of our current top ten) to reinvent himself at cruiser.

It's doubtful he would have been a genuine world champ (big three) these days. I think stu has firmly got the rose coloured specs on. Nelson would have beaten him clearly, IMO. Mind you, he would have had a good go with the rest at their current level. Him and Hobbo would be a cracker.

Joe's summary is spot on...he was a good, all round operator.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Post by Deserter »

knowall wrote:McCory had no bottle as a fighter simple as that
Shouldn't your user name be "Knowsf**kall"? Whatever McCory's faults (and he was certainly limited), he was a gutsy fighter - most knowledgable fans will remember that absolute war he had when he defended his world title against that South African - rallied from the brink of defeat to triumph.
He also stepped in the ring with Lewis, which as a tiny heavyweight must have taken some bottle.
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Post by KOJOE90 »

knowall wrote:McCory had no bottle as a fighter simple as that,
I can't agree with that comment, as a novice pro he went in with some of the UK's top heavyweights. He showed plenty of bottle in winning and defending his IBF World title. He went in with a young and determined Lennox Lewis and in his last fight showed plenty of guts getting off the floor to go the distance with a peak Al Cole, who was possibly the best Cruiserweight in the World at that time.

Limited at World level yes, but he showed plenty of determination throughout his career.
Post Reply