Chambers v Dimitrenko
-
London Boy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39
- Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 13:38
Chambers v Dimitrenko
Anyone know if this is on sky?
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
No but there are plenty of links to streams on the net.
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
What time does it start?
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
Has Chambers actually come in ripped shape this time? I heard he was 208llb.
Dimitrenko willwin a decision unless Eddie finds a way to hurt him, which is not out of the question.
Dimitrenko willwin a decision unless Eddie finds a way to hurt him, which is not out of the question.
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
http://www.secondsout.com/world-boxing- ... in-hamburgsteve689 wrote:Has Chambers actually come in ripped shape this time? I heard he was 208llb.
Dimitrenko willwin a decision unless Eddie finds a way to hurt him, which is not out of the question.
Chambers could very easily make cruiserweight, which is where I think he might go if he loses this fight.
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
Should be at cruiser.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13313
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
Anyone PM me a decent stream please? Should be around 10pm UK time, I guess..usualy is in Germany.
Dimi may have a shaky chin, but they've been careful matching him..
Dimi may have a shaky chin, but they've been careful matching him..
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
My paid stream says it starts at 9 PM, so be ready then just in case. 
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13313
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
Thanks will do, you'll probably get an undercard fight first.
Watching Independence day with my kids at the moment, so may fall asleep.......
Watching Independence day with my kids at the moment, so may fall asleep.......
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
i am watching Monshipour/moreno at the moment
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
Are you en France? Or watching by stream?REAL_DEAL wrote:i am watching Monshipour/moreno at the moment
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
neither satellite.
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
Cheers. Just curious.
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
Chambers wins on points, this includes a standing count against Dimitrenko in round 7, he was also knocked down in round 10, yet british judge Paul Thomas (who i have alot of respect for) scored it 113-113. work that one out!!
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
Chambers battered Dimitrenko. It wasn't close at all. I bet the punch stats look impressive. Chambers would be a force at cruiserweight. He was still a bit fleshy at 208 (or 205) lbs.
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
Dimitrenko is terrible, but it's good that Chambers has been applying his talent.
113-113 - ha! will paul thomas be getting plenty more work over there, then?
not that i'm saying anything improper happened, and i don't think it's wise to 2nd guess judges all the time, but scoring a one-sided fight even is very odd. then again, maybe it's not.
113-113 - ha! will paul thomas be getting plenty more work over there, then?
not that i'm saying anything improper happened, and i don't think it's wise to 2nd guess judges all the time, but scoring a one-sided fight even is very odd. then again, maybe it's not.
-
Pongsaklek
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 135
- Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:06
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
He also had M´baye beating Kotelnik in the re, maybe he is trying to make up for that injustice.Autobarn wrote:Dimitrenko is terrible, but it's good that Chambers has been applying his talent.
113-113 - ha! will paul thomas be getting plenty more work over there, then?
not that i'm saying anything improper happened, and i don't think it's wise to 2nd guess judges all the time, but scoring a one-sided fight even is very odd. then again, maybe it's not.
-
Eraserhead
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 554
- Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 18:46
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.
He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
no way, not at all. he was well outworked by a flu ridden povetkin, who seemed to take his heart. he was probably 5 point away from winning, was chambers. chambers is a good heavyweight and povetkin beat him. it's funny hopw chambers gets credit for his wins but povetkin never got credit for beating chambers.Eraserhead wrote:Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.
He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.
-
Eraserhead
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 554
- Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 18:46
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
If he's so utterly useless, why couldn't Povetkin get anywhere close to hurting or stopping him? Sure, Chambers got outworked over the stretch, but I remember him bouncing right hands off Povetkin's jaw for most of the fight. It was a very, very competitive fight.Autobarn wrote:no way, not at all. he was well outworked by a flu ridden povetkin, who seemed to take his heart. he was probably 5 point away from winning, was chambers. chambers is a good heavyweight and povetkin beat him. it's funny hopw chambers gets credit for his wins but povetkin never got credit for beating chambers.Eraserhead wrote:Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.
He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
Er, Autobarn said Dimitrenko is useless, not Chambers.Eraserhead wrote:If he's so utterly useless, why couldn't Povetkin get anywhere close to hurting or stopping him? Sure, Chambers got outworked over the stretch, but I remember him bouncing right hands off Povetkin's jaw for most of the fight. It was a very, very competitive fight.Autobarn wrote:no way, not at all. he was well outworked by a flu ridden povetkin, who seemed to take his heart. he was probably 5 point away from winning, was chambers. chambers is a good heavyweight and povetkin beat him. it's funny hopw chambers gets credit for his wins but povetkin never got credit for beating chambers.Eraserhead wrote:Chambers is a quality little heavyweight and a real dangerman. He's now beaten Peter and Dimitrenko in succession and could have easily added Povetkin to that list if he believed in himself a bit more. He was probably only one or two rounds away from beating Povetkin.
He's probably got a right to claim he's the third best heavy out there right now.
povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.
-
Eraserhead
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 554
- Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 18:46
Re: Chambers v Dimitrenko
Er, Autobarn said Dimitrenko is useless, not Chambers.[/quote]Asterix wrote:If he's so utterly useless, why couldn't Povetkin get anywhere close to hurting or stopping him? Sure, Chambers got outworked over the stretch, but I remember him bouncing right hands off Povetkin's jaw for most of the fight. It was a very, very competitive fight.Eraserhead wrote:povetkin and dimitrenko are leagues apart. one is good, one is utterly useless.
