There's nowt wrong with Khan's career - except for the exceptional expectations placed on him. He is earning very well for the stage he is at, and is effectively headlining shows, and being treated like a superstar.U.F.O wrote:khan resume is a good as most at this stage of his career, compaire it to Hattons and tell me how it was any better.boxerbob wrote:gomez was shot 5 years ago
khan is not world class . he hasnt beat a top 20 fighter
he has been well managed , well managed away from anyone with a punch
khan resume is very poor for a guy who has been a pro for 4+ years
Hatton wasn't really thrust into the spotlight until around 2000-2001, he didn't start fighting at the MEN until 2000, and didn't fight there regularly until 2001.
He started becoming a big noise around the time of the Pendleton fight as I recall, but Khan has already got way more exposure than Hatton had by that stage. In fact, he has probably been a bigger name since his first fight.
Hatton took a long time to build his profile, and didn't become an international star until he fought in the states, wheras people know about Khan in the US already - even if he isn't quite a superstar, he's only a couple of fights in the states away from that.
That being the case, Khan's career cannot be looked at quite as objectively as other fighters, with great expectationj comes forceful criticism, you cannot have it both ways.
I think Khan is doing ok for this stage of his career - but his fragility means he's being moved very quickly and that they will purposefullly avoid his best domestic opposition.