Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by twenty six »

Whicker,
You converted then ?
Celery,
Prepared to eat some humble pie ?
This lad is the next big thing from these shores.
I just hope he gets showcased more, and hope that his next outing isas a Headliner in Sheffield.
Quality, Ezekiel, quality.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by Spud »

Interesting reading some of the posts after the event!!! :TU: :TU:

Calling all of the Michael Lomax supporters - where are you - where is the "humble pie"??
celerygolf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 122
Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 10:59

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by celerygolf »

As a close friend of lomax it was horrible to see him picked apart by a superior fighter. Brook will be a world champ within a couple of years. Lomax admitted to me after the fight that brooks speed and accuracy was incredible. I stand corrected, but I had to be biased as he's my mate.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by whicker »

The way Brook was throw that jab, fast, accurate and catching him flush, was impressive. Totally dominated the fight.

Need to see something like Brook V Michael Jennings now.
SOUTHPAW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 331
Joined: 24 Jun 2008, 17:40

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by SOUTHPAW »

celerygolf wrote:As a close friend of lomax it was horrible to see him picked apart by a superior fighter. Brook will be a world champ within a couple of years. Lomax admitted to me after the fight that brooks speed and accuracy was incredible. I stand corrected, but I had to be biased as he's my mate.
WELL SAID
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by Spud »

celerygolf wrote:As a close friend of lomax it was horrible to see him picked apart by a superior fighter. Brook will be a world champ within a couple of years. Lomax admitted to me after the fight that brooks speed and accuracy was incredible. I stand corrected, but I had to be biased as he's my mate.
Top Man and top post!!! :TU: :TU:

I hope your man comes back and does something on the domestic scene and by the way there is no shame in that. Kel Brook is something very special indeed and its something I have banged on about for a while now - at last people are taking some notice of the lad.
celerygolf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 122
Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 10:59

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by celerygolf »

I have to be honest I don't know if he'll fight again. He's 31 now with a nice family. It's a shame cos he never got the break at the right time and when he did he was unfortunate to come up against brook. I think he's still good enough to win a domestic title if brook vacates but we will wait and see. Speaking to Paul cook at the hotel, he rates brook very highly and expects him to be world champ.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by twenty six »

I don't think it will be long before the title's vacant mate.
Subject to how the close season goes, I wouldn't at all be surprised if that's Kel's last British title fight.
He got what he set out to achieve - the Lonsdale Belt outright.
Onwards and upwards as they say.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by whicker »

twenty six wrote:I don't think it will be long before the title's vacant mate.
Subject to how the close season goes, I wouldn't at all be surprised if that's Kel's last British title fight.
He got what he set out to achieve - the Lonsdale Belt outright.
Onwards and upwards as they say.
Yeah, there doesn't seem to be that much else left for him to do at British title level.

Is he comfortable at Welter, or maybe moving up to Light middle at some point?

That said, there are still domestic opponents who he could face- Hatton (s) , Jennings, Watson, O' Donnell.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by twenty six »

As far as I'm aware mate he wants to stay where he is.
That said he's very young still, and still developing.
In years to come he'll definitely move through the weights.
danfoster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 651
Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 05:07

Re: Kell Brook v Michael Lomax added to Khan card

Post by danfoster »

I personally think that Kell should box jennings next and then go for the european - which i hear may become vacant again soon coz that kid that beat bonsu has a high WBC ranking

Good performance from kell from still lots, lots, lots more to come. Let's see what happens with a 12wk training camp and an opponent that Kell fears. Then we will see the best of him.

As some of us having been saying for quite some time, though, there is no doubt he is something very special and it's good to see that he is beginning to get the recognition he deserves. There's only Cleverly and, perhaps, Khan who are anywhere near him when it comes to best UK prospects (in my very humble opinion).

Onus is on Kell to stay busy now - if he's training hard and boxing, the rest will naturally fall into place.
Post Reply