top prospects

Post Reply
boxingchat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1934
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 05:26

Re: top prospects

Post by boxingchat »

Nathan Cleverly, Kell Brook, Stephen Smith and Billy Joe Saunders.

I like Scott Quigg too.
teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Re: top prospects

Post by teddy007 »

boxingchat wrote:Nathan Cleverly, Kell Brook, Stephen Smith and Billy Joe Saunders.

I like Scott Quigg too.
Frank Will be signing Quigg soon then? When I trained down the collyhurst for a brief time he was jsut starting out with Reece Roberts and he had come from a kick-boxing background I think, he looked very young but he had something about him and is improving all the time.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: top prospects

Post by DG. »

boxingchat wrote:Nathan Cleverly, Kell Brook, Stephen Smith and Billy Joe Saunders.

I like Scott Quigg too.


They won't be tested until they are 40-0.

Typical Fwank nonsense, then he will sue them when they leave him...allegedly!

:lol:
lefthook82
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33

Re: top prospects

Post by lefthook82 »

I've heard too many good things about Swifty so I'm eager to watch him. Havent seen a second of footage

Brook interests me. I like him alot but a a solid counterpuncher might have him seeing stars because of the way he leaves his chin int he air. I also think his straight right is a little telegraphed

Nathan Cleverly is solid but I dont know if he is a top prospect. Time will tell. Maybe in 5-10 fights time.

BJS. Don't rate him. Showing an early tendancy to be easy to hit and his stance should eb a nightmare for oppoents at this leevl. You can almost forget he is southpaw. Looks to small to be a SMW and his KO record will dry up once the refs stop being overzealous. If I recall yet to drop any of his opponents( didnt see his 2nd fight) but is bring banded as a puncher

Never heard of Quigg
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: top prospects

Post by Dioufy »

lefthook82 wrote:Nathan Cleverly is solid but I dont know if he is a top prospect. Time will tell. Maybe in 5-10 fights time.
I would say in some fights he has looked better than Brook. In the McIntosh fight he showed he can fight, as well as box someone's ears off. The Oakey win on paper was a belter, but us boxing fans know that Oakey took the fight at about 90 seconds notice, so that win is slightly flawed. Brook looked sensational against McIntyre though, but is McIntyre really that good? I'm not so sure. Lomax did well winning PrizeFighter but it's obvious he's not really British class - the same goes for Billy Boyle, as well as Mr. Jones.

Tough to say which one is the bigger prospect though.
danieljenkins
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 177
Joined: 04 Mar 2009, 09:45

Re: top prospects

Post by danieljenkins »

Nathan Cleverly is the real deal !
kel brooks is going to be a world champ id back my house on that
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: top prospects

Post by Dioufy »

Yeah, I agree.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: top prospects

Post by alexpaterson »

Kell Brook
Nathan Cleverly

Saunders, Gavin, DeGale, Sutherland, Fury, Smith, Price I'll wait to see how they fair against British level fighters before I get too excitied about them but they are looking good so far :TU:
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: top prospects

Post by Dioufy »

Hate to admit it, but DeGale looked very good in his last fight.

But the "DeGold is Bold" was nonsense.
CJB
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 06:58

Re: top prospects

Post by CJB »

The Oakey win on paper was a belter, but us boxing fans know that Oakey took the fight at about 90 seconds notice, so that win is slightly flawed
To be fair Oakey was training for a fight against a relatively similar in style and size opponent (though not of the same level). Cleverley was training for Dean Francis who is of course a similar level opponent as Oakey but a very different style.

You could argue either way as to who had a more difficult job adjusting their plans, but I don't think you should discredit what was a very good win and fight based on the late notice of opponent change.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: top prospects

Post by Deserter »

CJB wrote:
The Oakey win on paper was a belter, but us boxing fans know that Oakey took the fight at about 90 seconds notice, so that win is slightly flawed
To be fair Oakey was training for a fight against a relatively similar in style and size opponent (though not of the same level). Cleverley was training for Dean Francis who is of course a similar level opponent as Oakey but a very different style.

You could argue either way as to who had a more difficult job adjusting their plans, but I don't think you should discredit what was a very good win and fight based on the late notice of opponent change.
And most importantly if they rematched now can anyone on the forum envisage anything but a comprehensive win for Cleverley, probably by stoppage? I certainly can't.
Eraserhead
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 554
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 18:46

Re: top prospects

Post by Eraserhead »

Kell Brook looks the best young titleholder at the moment. Should he dispose of Jennings in style, we could be talking.

As far as the even fresher prospects go, George Groves is the best of the new super-middles and I like Stephen Smith.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: top prospects

Post by Dioufy »

CJB wrote:
The Oakey win on paper was a belter, but us boxing fans know that Oakey took the fight at about 90 seconds notice, so that win is slightly flawed
To be fair Oakey was training for a fight against a relatively similar in style and size opponent (though not of the same level). Cleverley was training for Dean Francis who is of course a similar level opponent as Oakey but a very different style.
He was quite fat that night though - he prepared for a knockover job, not Nathan Cleverly.
Post Reply