khan V mcCloskey

Post Reply
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23091
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: khan V mcCloskey

Post by mickey1975 »

wont happen,mate
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: khan V mcCloskey

Post by alexpaterson »

Cant see it happening any time soon
Cannibal
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1432
Joined: 12 Jul 2003, 20:41

Re: khan V mcCloskey

Post by Cannibal »

I say preference wise it will be...

1 - Hatton if he is willing.
2 - Marcos Maidana, get that mandatory out of the way.
3 - Witter if he beats Alexander
4 - Bradley/Campbell winner
5 - Some blown up lightweight
6 - Paul McCloskey
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: khan V mcCloskey

Post by Adamj1987 »

Cannibal wrote:I say preference wise it will be...

1 - Hatton if he is willing.
2 - Marcos Maidana, get that mandatory out of the way.
3 - Witter if he beats Alexander
4 - Bradley/Campbell winner
5 - Some blown up superfeather
6 - Paul McCloskey
fixed :TU:
dbf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1793
Joined: 28 Nov 2003, 11:06

Re: khan V mcCloskey

Post by dbf »

Cannibal wrote:I say preference wise it will be...

1 - Hatton if he is willing.
2 - Marcos Maidana, get that mandatory out of the way.
3 - Witter if he beats Alexander
4 - Bradley/Campbell winner
5 - Some blown up lightweight
6 - Paul McCloskey
Think Salita is WBA mandatory but Maidana is interim champ.

Roach has mentioned Khan v Salita on the Cotto v Pacquio undercard.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: khan V mcCloskey

Post by bigjack »

feargalocuinneagain wrote::box: Anybody heard news about this potential fight or am i dreaming?
I think he will end up fighting that old favourite TBA,ex super feather/non puncher/has been/never will be/was once 5 or 6 years ago but is a big name.,although i did see on the teletext on t.v that khan is being persued by 'NEW YORK DANGERMAN SALITA' :lol:
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: khan V mcCloskey

Post by 15829 »

wouldnt be shocked if it khan v morales on the cotto pac man undercard
Post Reply