My2Sense wrote:BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote:
- Your lack of relevancy has always been your calling card.
No, it hasn't. As usual you're just making up gibberish.
The issue here is how Tucker's resume/accomplishments compare to Tua's. Going off on lengthy tangents about Tucker's "potential" and managerial issues doesn't have any bearing on that whatsoever.
- That gibber you hear is the splish-splashing of your drooling countenance making waves.
Thread header is clear, Was Lennox Lewis Better Than Mike Tyson? Prime to prime when Tyson was considered the most invincible fighter in history, Tucker gave him Tyson's hardest scrap. Many years later a well past his best Tucker had Lewis in trouble and only Tony's shaky old man's legs prevented him from taking that bout.
Best to best it's all Tyson. Careerwise Lewis edges on consistency that sees Tyson behind bars for 5 of his "prime" physical years, "prime" not being applicable here since Tyson not mentally fit to box and had clearly left the building. Nobody was at home except for occasional guest appearances.
Tua had just as much potential as Tucker, but both derailed by severe management problems. Anyone believing that management plays no role in fighter success needs another hobby. Tyson the poster boy of what good management can accomplish and what bad management can destroy.
