HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post Reply
R7TKO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 36
Joined: 13 Aug 2009, 19:34

HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by R7TKO »

Cant wait be a crackin fight for the Brtish title :box:
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by alexpaterson »

Ye should be a good one I have been very impressed with Booth I see him winning this one and going on to the Euro scene but it will be a very tough fight for him
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by n1ebf »

Hunter hits a lot harder IMO and he knows something about coming to the ring in great shape. I like Booth but I think Hunter will still be too much for him.
gemmell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 16 Jul 2009, 16:12

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by gemmell »

R7TKO wrote:Cant wait be a crackin fight for the Brtish title :box:
we have already had a thread about this fight mate :TU: oh well..i think booth will outclass hunter. if it wasn't for the alcahol addiction booth had he would be fighting for world honours i think..but still he is in shape and looking very good..maybe he can challenge for the european title next year :box:
phil5555
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 378
Joined: 02 Jan 2009, 10:28

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by phil5555 »

GREAT FIGHT :witzend:
Steve89
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 60
Joined: 30 Jun 2009, 19:09

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by Steve89 »

The winner should fight Munroe. I'd put my money on Hunter, Booth is featherfisted.
Des1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 872
Joined: 07 Dec 2006, 10:11

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by Des1 »

Steve89 wrote:The winner should fight Munroe. I'd put my money on Hunter, Booth is featherfisted.
Booth featherfisted?? Na, I dont think so. No more than what Hunter is anyway. How do you think Booth is featherfisted? Have you took a punch from him?
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by n1ebf »

Des1 wrote:
Steve89 wrote:The winner should fight Munroe. I'd put my money on Hunter, Booth is featherfisted.
Booth featherfisted?? Na, I dont think so. No more than what Hunter is anyway. How do you think Booth is featherfisted? Have you took a punch from him?
I've never seen Booth box live but I've seenHunter plenty. He hits hard and does this continuously until he just breaks opponents. At domestic and European level anyway, at least in his pomp, and I would expect him to be in good shape.
As I say Booth is a very personable guy who doesn't run his mouth or make excuses like Matthew Hatton say, but I think he will get beat by Hunter assuming Hunter hasn't let himself go, which I can't see. This is one where I don't really want to see a loser.
ryeboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 41
Joined: 02 Jan 2008, 16:07

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by ryeboy »

if this fight had been taking place before micheals loss for the world title to molitor, he would have been long odds on to dispose of booth,
and if he comes back at anything like his best he will do so now, but the long layoff and the move to featherweight (must struggle to make s-bantom) casts doubts over the result now, with booth in such good form, and weather hunters desire is still there being in doubt?
but still for me its hunter on points or late stoppage as hell be too big and strong and i feel hell swarm all over the smart boxing but light punching booth, providing hes back to something like his best!
Des1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 872
Joined: 07 Dec 2006, 10:11

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by Des1 »

NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
Des1 wrote:
Steve89 wrote:The winner should fight Munroe. I'd put my money on Hunter, Booth is featherfisted.
Booth featherfisted?? Na, I dont think so. No more than what Hunter is anyway. How do you think Booth is featherfisted? Have you took a punch from him?
I've never seen Booth box live but I've seenHunter plenty. He hits hard and does this continuously until he just breaks opponents. At domestic and European level anyway, at least in his pomp, and I would expect him to be in good shape.
As I say Booth is a very personable guy who doesn't run his mouth or make excuses like Matthew Hatton say, but I think he will get beat by Hunter assuming Hunter hasn't let himself go, which I can't see. This is one where I don't really want to see a loser.
Yes, I wasn't saying Hunter was featherfisted, I was making a statement that Booth is not, that if he is regarded as such then same could be said about Hunter then as I dont think either of them are.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by THEBUTCH »

I can't see Booth matching Hunter for power, although Jason did look comfortable at the weight last time.

Booth needs to be at his cagey best to outclass Hunter. I'm note sure Hunter's fire is still burning like it used to, if Booth can outfox him, I can imagine Hunter losing interest and drop a points loss.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by dondada »

NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Hunter hits a lot harder IMO and he knows something about coming to the ring in great shape. I like Booth but I think Hunter will still be too much for him.
Unless Hunter has really re-dedicated himself, he'll get stopped.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by Hagler2002 »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Hunter hits a lot harder IMO and he knows something about coming to the ring in great shape. I like Booth but I think Hunter will still be too much for him.
Unless Hunter has really re-dedicated himself, he'll get stopped.

SSssshhhh, I'm sure the bookies read the forums when pricing stuff up, I will be having a good chunk on Booth to win via stoppage.
dbflex
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 870
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 12:53

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by dbflex »

Booth is too smart, too adaptable and has too much variety for Hunter IMO. And feather-fisted? No way. He may not hit as hard at super-bantam as in the lighter weights but he's a respectable puncher.
Des1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 872
Joined: 07 Dec 2006, 10:11

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by Des1 »

Hunter's main thing is/was work rate, not a massive puncher, not brilliant skills, just alot of heart, very high work rate, with decent skill and power but like I said not his main arsenal. Work rate would be the first thing you lose generally, so Im not so sure if Hunter will be as effective againts a cute, skillfull fighter in Booth now when its likely he will not reach the work rate he had a few years back and of course has he still got the big heart he had? Is he as hungry? Im not so sure. Im going for Booth to out class Hunter but thats not taking anything away from him but I just think in skill wise Booth is ahead and its unlikely that Hunter has the same work rate as he did have and if he has the same heart that could mean he takes unneccessary risks also.
TheGoods
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1270
Joined: 28 Sep 2003, 16:10

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by TheGoods »

Still not seen any prices for this yet. Anyone seen any oods kicking about?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by Counter-puncher »

Des1 wrote:Hunter's main thing is/was work rate, not a massive puncher, not brilliant skills, just alot of heart, very high work rate, with decent skill and power but like I said not his main arsenal. Work rate would be the first thing you lose generally, so Im not so sure if Hunter will be as effective againts a cute, skillfull fighter in Booth now when its likely he will not reach the work rate he had a few years back and of course has he still got the big heart he had? Is he as hungry? Im not so sure. Im going for Booth to out class Hunter but thats not taking anything away from him but I just think in skill wise Booth is ahead and its unlikely that Hunter has the same work rate as he did have and if he has the same heart that could mean he takes unneccessary risks also.
good post mate that was what i think i was trying to say on an earlier thread :TU:
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Steve89 wrote:The winner should fight Munroe. I'd put my money on Hunter, Booth is featherfisted.
Steve Molitor was so called featherfisted
I fancy Booth in this one,id have thought the odds wouldnt be to bad either...
R7TKO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 36
Joined: 13 Aug 2009, 19:34

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by R7TKO »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Hunter hits a lot harder IMO and he knows something about coming to the ring in great shape. I like Booth but I think Hunter will still be too much for him.
Unless Hunter has really re-dedicated himself, he'll get stopped.
Hunter has dedicated himself & is looking in brilliant shape as all Neil Fanons fighters always do. Hunters realy up for this & looking forward to what has all the makins of a crackin fight & bk in the title mix. :box:
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28507
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by Coco »

Hunter will not have fought for a year when this happens and hasn't particularly impressed in his comeback, dropping rounds against the usual suspects.
I think he will also struggle more against a fast handed clever fighter, rather than someoe who will stand in front of him. I see Booth winning a clear decision against the stronger Hunter
TheGoods
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1270
Joined: 28 Sep 2003, 16:10

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by TheGoods »

4/11 Booth 2/1 Hunter in the betting I have seen so far. Interesting...
BigEars
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 998
Joined: 16 Jan 2006, 14:23

Re: HUNTER v BOOTH ?

Post by BigEars »

TheGoods wrote:4/11 Booth 2/1 Hunter in the betting I have seen so far. Interesting...
Any odds yet on Booth by stoppage ?
Post Reply