which of these verdicts were wrong ??
-
Quixall
- Heavyweight

which of these verdicts were wrong ??
I'm just interested in waht other people think........
Last edited by Quixall on 10 Sep 2009, 16:29, edited 2 times in total.
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
What a stupid thread, you could quite easily make a case for every one yet can only choose one option.
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
Shouldn't there be a "none of them" option?
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
Both of the Pacquiao v Marquez fights should have gone to Marquez IMO.
Floyd v Oscar was a clear but competitive win for Floyd.
The other four could have gone either way.
Floyd v Oscar was a clear but competitive win for Floyd.
The other four could have gone either way.
-
Quixall
- Heavyweight

Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
SORRY GUYS I SET IT UP WRONG LOL
YOU CAN NOW CHOOSE ALL OF THE FIGHTS IF YOU WANT
Quix
YOU CAN NOW CHOOSE ALL OF THE FIGHTS IF YOU WANT
Quix
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
the 2 jmm and pac and the taylor v hopkins 1 you should of put the winky wright v taylor up aswell
-
big lennox
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2550
- Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
How about De La Hoya -Mosley II as well. Oscar won that fight, and shane knows it.
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
For me, the only one was correct was Tito vs DLH (although Oscar SHOULD have beaten tito but blew it).
All of the rest, I think with the exception of JMM vs Pac 2 could have gone either way. I thought JMM 2 was a close but clear. DLH vs Mayweather was a draw on my card.
All of the rest, I think with the exception of JMM vs Pac 2 could have gone either way. I thought JMM 2 was a close but clear. DLH vs Mayweather was a draw on my card.
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
I must be cracking up ![[icon_knockout.gif] :KO:](./images/smilies/icon_knockout.gif)
-
Chris W 1982
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1139
- Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
I voted for everyone of them fights.
Trinidad/De La Hoya was not even close
Trinidad/De La Hoya was not even close
-
Quixall
- Heavyweight

Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
De La Hoya was definately robbed that night....The quiet man 2004 wrote:I voted for everyone of them fights.
Trinidad/De La Hoya was not even close
Out of all the fights i listed, i would say that was the most clear cut, in terms of the judges getting it wrong.
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
John vs Tyson was the MOST WRONG!!! LOL!!
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
x2terrez wrote:John vs Tyson was the MOST WRONG!!! LOL!!
(2 million)
-
bobcat
- Heavyweight

Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
``heres a bunch of fights i know people are somewhat spilt on their opinion of``
and im too lazy to make a real thread,so here`s a list of them,as if we havent talked about them enough at the time``
moron
and im too lazy to make a real thread,so here`s a list of them,as if we havent talked about them enough at the time``
moron
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
Lots of those fights could have gone either way (I thought Calzaghe clearly beat Hopkins though), so I don't think any of them were wrong verdicts.
Another poster mentioned DLH-Mosley II. I watched the fight with the sound off preventing influence from any biased commentary and I had DLH winning 116-112. I still don't understand how Mosley could have won that fight fairly. He was outlanded by over 100 punches I believe and there was only one time where he rocked Oscar, so I don't buy the "he was landing harder punches" excuse. When you are out boxed that much you better hurt the guy a few times.
Another poster mentioned DLH-Mosley II. I watched the fight with the sound off preventing influence from any biased commentary and I had DLH winning 116-112. I still don't understand how Mosley could have won that fight fairly. He was outlanded by over 100 punches I believe and there was only one time where he rocked Oscar, so I don't buy the "he was landing harder punches" excuse. When you are out boxed that much you better hurt the guy a few times.
Last edited by crusader on 11 Sep 2009, 21:46, edited 1 time in total.
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
Oh it's the Bobcat on a drunken insult-spree...........................bobcat wrote:``heres a bunch of fights i know people are somewhat spilt on their opinion of``
and im too lazy to make a real thread,so here`s a list of them,as if we havent talked about them enough at the time``
moron
-
bobcat
- Heavyweight

Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Oh it's the Bobcat on a drunken insult-spree...........................bobcat wrote:``heres a bunch of fights i know people are somewhat spilt on their opinion of``
and im too lazy to make a real thread,so here`s a list of them,as if we havent talked about them enough at the time``
moron
what the hell,i displayed your post,because im bored. and no,im not drunk. i told you i dont drink anymore,right after i told you i have cirrohsis.that was right around the time you challenged me to a fight,if youll recall.
ive talked to you in a civil manner lots of times. if you look at the Bolt thread i even repaired a mistake i made,because you thought one thing and i told you another.(it was about the bailey-johnson race). i repaired what i had said,because i thought you had written that the wrong person won,and i was wrong.there were no insults or anything. i dont remember exactly what happened there,but i remember it was you.
so,are you going to follow everthing i say with an eyeroll and sarcastic comment? cause that would be kinda cvnty. and i had no problem with you until I ADMITTED having missunderstood your post,and you started to act like clint eastwood trying to be cheesy.now THAT`S cheesy.
youve challenged 2 people to fights in the past 3 days. maybe those people were jerks,or maybe you just get carried away. ill let you think on that.
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
bobcat wrote:NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Oh it's the Bobcat on a drunken insult-spree...........................bobcat wrote:``heres a bunch of fights i know people are somewhat spilt on their opinion of``
and im too lazy to make a real thread,so here`s a list of them,as if we havent talked about them enough at the time``
moron
what the hell,i displayed your post,because im bored. and no,im not drunk. i told you i dont drink anymore,right after i told you i have cirrohsis.that was right around the time you challenged me to a fight,if youll recall.
ive talked to you in a civil manner lots of times. if you look at the Bolt thread i even repaired a mistake i made,because you thought one thing and i told you another.(it was about the bailey-johnson race). i repaired what i had said,because i thought you had written that the wrong person won,and i was wrong.there were no insults or anything. i dont remember exactly what happened there,but i remember it was you.
so,are you going to follow everthing i say with an eyeroll and sarcastic comment? cause that would be kinda cvnty. and i had no problem with you until I ADMITTED having missunderstood your post,and you started to act like clint eastwood trying to be cheesy.now THAT`S cheesy.
youve challenged 2 people to fights in the past 3 days. maybe those people were jerks,or maybe you just get carried away. ill let you think on that.
And Both classily called me a c*nt and told me to f*ck off after very innocuous comments, jokes actually, made by me. I think the second guy even followed your lead , thinking it was somehow humourous, so well done
Jeez why can't people take a pop politely.......Hagler 2002's invited me on to the cobbles a couple of times but Chr*st he's never felt the need to call me a c*nt or tell me to f*ck off.
And as for reading my post and taking me off ignore cos you're bored, you don't need to justify it to the forum matey.....i'll have to go back and look at the Donovan Bailey thread lol. Think I may have been wrong actually, I said Bailey pulled up and it was actually Johnson
-
bobcat
- Heavyweight

Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
[/quote]
Oh it's the Bobcat on a drunken insult-spree...........................
[/quote]
what the hell,i displayed your post,because im bored. and no,im not drunk. i told you i dont drink anymore,right after i told you i have cirrohsis.that was right around the time you challenged me to a fight,if youll recall.
ive talked to you in a civil manner lots of times. if you look at the Bolt thread i even repaired a mistake i made,because you thought one thing and i told you another.(it was about the bailey-johnson race). i repaired what i had said,because i thought you had written that the wrong person won,and i was wrong.there were no insults or anything. i dont remember exactly what happened there,but i remember it was you.
so,are you going to follow everthing i say with an eyeroll and sarcastic comment? cause that would be kinda cvnty. and i had no problem with you until I ADMITTED having missunderstood your post,and you started to act like clint eastwood trying to be cheesy.now THAT`S cheesy.
youve challenged 2 people to fights in the past 3 days. maybe those people were jerks,or maybe you just get carried away. ill let you think on that.[/quote]
And Both classily called me a c*nt and told me to f*ck off after very innocuous comments, jokes actually, made by me. I think the second guy even followed your lead , thinking it was somehow humourous, so well done
Jeez why can't people take a pop politely.......Hagler 2002's invited me on to the cobbles a couple of times but Chr*st he's never felt the need to call me a c*nt or tell me to f*ck off.
And as for reading my post and taking me off ignore cos you're bored, you don't need to justify it to the forum matey.....i'll have to go back and look at the Donovan Bailey thread lol. Think I may have been wrong actually, I said Bailey pulled up and it was actually Johnson
[/quote]
im a grown man for chirst`s sake. yes,i can ``take a pop``. i called you a pudendum cause thats what i do when i think someone is really trying to have a go at me,as you brits might say.and yes,id do the same in person,asswhooping that might follow for me or not,im not really afraid of it.
again,i think it was just a bit of unpleasantness(sp?),that affected us both at the wrong time. this isnt for me,but i think in general you should calm down a bit. its not a question of being able to beat people up. im sure you can.but one day you might beat the wrong person up,or someone will beat you up.
you seem like a reasonable chap,on the whole. so id like to take you off ignore,and that we could just talk normally like boxing fans might. i wasnt trying to be sarcastic up there,i hope you appreciate that better then i could appreciate the joke you made 3 days ago.i just think you shouldnt challenge people to fights. and im not calling you a wimp,but i told you what i think the problems are with that up there.it just sounds lame,on the whole.
ive been having a really hard time lately. i found out i am really sick, and in the time it took to write that my wife left me. and i tend to be a dick in general in my posts,it tends to colouyr thatr,and i am genuinelly sorry about it. it isnt your problem,or anyone on here`s problem for that matter.
so this is me,waving a white flag over here. you can be germany,or you can be britain.its kinda up to you.
Oh it's the Bobcat on a drunken insult-spree...........................
what the hell,i displayed your post,because im bored. and no,im not drunk. i told you i dont drink anymore,right after i told you i have cirrohsis.that was right around the time you challenged me to a fight,if youll recall.
ive talked to you in a civil manner lots of times. if you look at the Bolt thread i even repaired a mistake i made,because you thought one thing and i told you another.(it was about the bailey-johnson race). i repaired what i had said,because i thought you had written that the wrong person won,and i was wrong.there were no insults or anything. i dont remember exactly what happened there,but i remember it was you.
so,are you going to follow everthing i say with an eyeroll and sarcastic comment? cause that would be kinda cvnty. and i had no problem with you until I ADMITTED having missunderstood your post,and you started to act like clint eastwood trying to be cheesy.now THAT`S cheesy.
youve challenged 2 people to fights in the past 3 days. maybe those people were jerks,or maybe you just get carried away. ill let you think on that.[/quote]
And Both classily called me a c*nt and told me to f*ck off after very innocuous comments, jokes actually, made by me. I think the second guy even followed your lead , thinking it was somehow humourous, so well done
Jeez why can't people take a pop politely.......Hagler 2002's invited me on to the cobbles a couple of times but Chr*st he's never felt the need to call me a c*nt or tell me to f*ck off.
And as for reading my post and taking me off ignore cos you're bored, you don't need to justify it to the forum matey.....i'll have to go back and look at the Donovan Bailey thread lol. Think I may have been wrong actually, I said Bailey pulled up and it was actually Johnson
im a grown man for chirst`s sake. yes,i can ``take a pop``. i called you a pudendum cause thats what i do when i think someone is really trying to have a go at me,as you brits might say.and yes,id do the same in person,asswhooping that might follow for me or not,im not really afraid of it.
again,i think it was just a bit of unpleasantness(sp?),that affected us both at the wrong time. this isnt for me,but i think in general you should calm down a bit. its not a question of being able to beat people up. im sure you can.but one day you might beat the wrong person up,or someone will beat you up.
you seem like a reasonable chap,on the whole. so id like to take you off ignore,and that we could just talk normally like boxing fans might. i wasnt trying to be sarcastic up there,i hope you appreciate that better then i could appreciate the joke you made 3 days ago.i just think you shouldnt challenge people to fights. and im not calling you a wimp,but i told you what i think the problems are with that up there.it just sounds lame,on the whole.
ive been having a really hard time lately. i found out i am really sick, and in the time it took to write that my wife left me. and i tend to be a dick in general in my posts,it tends to colouyr thatr,and i am genuinelly sorry about it. it isnt your problem,or anyone on here`s problem for that matter.
so this is me,waving a white flag over here. you can be germany,or you can be britain.its kinda up to you.
-
bobcat
- Heavyweight

Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
Edited by Mod - Offensive Languagesg1985 wrote:Still flirting with each other?
-
bobcat
- Heavyweight

Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
i was kidding mr.sg.sg1985 wrote:bobcat wrote:hey as shole,i should have said what i did in a PM. but im not some kinda queer. i was trying to be the bigger man,and you had to come in and insert a comment about homosexuality. ok. ill stick my cock up your ass if thats your fantasy. as i mentionned before my wife left so i gotta stick it somewhere. otherwise just stfu.sg1985 wrote:Still flirting with each other?![]()
Some people just can't take a joke.
i dont really want to stick my co ck up your ass.but hey,its saturday,i got nothing better to do.
p.m. me,we`ll talk.
again,im kidding. maybe we should all just put ``im kidding after every post. that way retards like me wouldnt ovvereact to sh it.
-
Quixall
- Heavyweight

Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
bobcat wrote:``heres a bunch of fights i know people are somewhat spilt on their opinion of``
and im too lazy to make a real thread,so here`s a list of them,as if we havent talked about them enough at the time``
moron
Edited by Mod - Offensive Language
-
bobcat
- Heavyweight

Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
Edited by Mod - Offensive Language/quote]Quixall wrote:bobcat wrote:``heres a bunch of fights i know people are somewhat spilt on their opinion of``
and im too lazy to make a real thread,so here`s a list of them,as if we havent talked about them enough at the time``
moron
Edited by Mod - Offensive Language
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
Lets keep this thread civilised guys.
Goodbye Bobcat. I just read his comments about jews and 9/11 in the 'other sports' forum. In addition to his comments in this thread (and a few others) he just had to go.
Goodbye Bobcat. I just read his comments about jews and 9/11 in the 'other sports' forum. In addition to his comments in this thread (and a few others) he just had to go.
-
I Feel Fine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2097
- Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 16:48
Re: which of these verdicts were wrong ??
I would say all of the above were bad decisions, except for Mayweather-De La Hoya and Hopkins-Calzaghe. I don't see how anyone disagrees with Mayweather winning, it was only a bad decision in that Oscar lost by a SD instead of a UD. I could see the case for Hopkins getting a draw, but I thought Calzaghe deserved the decision. Peak for peak its a different story.