EVERYONE READ- GREAT TIP HERE
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
EVERYONE READ- GREAT TIP HERE
people- a very good one here.
blue square 7/2 for calzaghe on points.
Salem has survived 12 with ANTWUN ECHOLS. also never been stopped. re the dq option, i believe there is none.
blue square 7/2 for calzaghe on points.
Salem has survived 12 with ANTWUN ECHOLS. also never been stopped. re the dq option, i believe there is none.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
-
My T Sharp
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32
Amazing value, Stan James only give 2/1.Goz wrote:Nice one Riddick, I've just got on it, I think they've made a mistake there.
If you sign up with Skybet you also get a £10 free bet so I just had £40 for £30!!
A great value bet for sure...
Any news on how sharp Salem is looking?
It's just a bit worrying cause Sky Sports and Sky Bet are related and Sky Bet have low odds on the early rounds.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
the return would be £65. the most important principle is you get your stake back.
Re Sky knowing something we don't, that is a very good point. Bookies often give stupid odds but this is ridiculous. I would even say stan james at 2/1 is generous. Calzaghe on points is more likely than 2/1, IMO.
Let's hope calzaghe hurts his hands and slaps his way to a points win. hell, he may not even need to. Anyone remember that round vs Brewer, think it was the 3rd, when calzaghe landed 3 flush hooks with full weight behind them, and brewer didn't even wobble? brewer was hardly hurt at all in that fight. echols on the other hand hurt brewer badly, but antwun couldn't stop this guy Salem.
it looks convincing on paper, but we shall have to see. I have a cover bet on the last 4 rounds anyway which would win my stake back if it ends in one of those rounds.
Re Sky knowing something we don't, that is a very good point. Bookies often give stupid odds but this is ridiculous. I would even say stan james at 2/1 is generous. Calzaghe on points is more likely than 2/1, IMO.
Let's hope calzaghe hurts his hands and slaps his way to a points win. hell, he may not even need to. Anyone remember that round vs Brewer, think it was the 3rd, when calzaghe landed 3 flush hooks with full weight behind them, and brewer didn't even wobble? brewer was hardly hurt at all in that fight. echols on the other hand hurt brewer badly, but antwun couldn't stop this guy Salem.
it looks convincing on paper, but we shall have to see. I have a cover bet on the last 4 rounds anyway which would win my stake back if it ends in one of those rounds.
I just put £150 on Calzaghe to win on points, bit risky but I dont bet often and when I do its usually a big one :)Riddick Blowe wrote:the return would be £65. the most important principle is you get your stake back.
Re Sky knowing something we don't, that is a very good point. Bookies often give stupid odds but this is ridiculous. I would even say stan james at 2/1 is generous. Calzaghe on points is more likely than 2/1, IMO.
Let's hope calzaghe hurts his hands and slaps his way to a points win. hell, he may not even need to. Anyone remember that round vs Brewer, think it was the 3rd, when calzaghe landed 3 flush hooks with full weight behind them, and brewer didn't even wobble? brewer was hardly hurt at all in that fight. echols on the other hand hurt brewer badly, but antwun couldn't stop this guy Salem.
it looks convincing on paper, but we shall have to see. I have a cover bet on the last 4 rounds anyway which would win my stake back if it ends in one of those rounds.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
that sounds like an intelligent bet mike. i put 60 on myself (including free bet), don't have the stones to put more on, i've done really well recently and haven't deposited any of it yet.
just thought, it might be because skybet are relatively new that they are offering such a generous price, thye need to lure people in somehow and maybe they are prepared to take risks until they are secure enough to shorten the odds.
just thought, it might be because skybet are relatively new that they are offering such a generous price, thye need to lure people in somehow and maybe they are prepared to take risks until they are secure enough to shorten the odds.
That could be it, looking at other betting places they do seem to be giving the better options on this one.Riddick Blowe wrote:that sounds like an intelligent bet mike. i put 60 on myself (including free bet), don't have the stones to put more on, i've done really well recently and haven't deposited any of it yet.
just thought, it might be because skybet are relatively new that they are offering such a generous price, thye need to lure people in somehow and maybe they are prepared to take risks until they are secure enough to shorten the odds.
I do not particularly like the Skybet site and structure, if the odds were the same I would use bet365 instead but its all about the odds.
If I do get lucky with this one it could help cover the cost of a holiday I have booked :)
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Exactly, it's all about the value. JC has been out for a time, the opponent is durable and has a track record, 11-2 is icredible value.Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:This is the first bet I've had in AGES. Steamed in to it. Just on the value principle.
I remember 8/1 about Hamed beating Calvo on points with fond memories...
Don't worry about ramadam, they still eat, just not during daylight.
-
E
- Heavyweight

This is a weird pattern - Skybet is 5-1 for calzaghe on points, but Stan James, Bet365 are 2-1 and 7-4!!!! very big discrepancy.
Additionally Skybet have 4-1 on round 1 (same on round 2 and 3)....yet bet365 and stanjames have 10-1 on round one......
Strange how Sky see this as a quick one for Joe, yet others see this as a PTS win for Joe.
What do Sky know that we don't?
Might be worth hedging with a couple of quid on the first round as well.....
Additionally Skybet have 4-1 on round 1 (same on round 2 and 3)....yet bet365 and stanjames have 10-1 on round one......
Strange how Sky see this as a quick one for Joe, yet others see this as a PTS win for Joe.
What do Sky know that we don't?
Might be worth hedging with a couple of quid on the first round as well.....
Relatively new? They've been going for a good couple of years nowRiddick Blowe wrote:that sounds like an intelligent bet mike. i put 60 on myself (including free bet), don't have the stones to put more on, i've done really well recently and haven't deposited any of it yet.
just thought, it might be because skybet are relatively new that they are offering such a generous price, thye need to lure people in somehow and maybe they are prepared to take risks until they are secure enough to shorten the odds.
If you goto http://www.bettingzone.co.uk then they give you the best priced odds for a number of boxing matches and other sports.
-
E
- Heavyweight
