Pacman is not p4p anything!

DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by DG. »

The guy can barely box! :D

PBF would decision him or stop hit to the body.

Mosley would KO him.

He lost TWICE to JMM!!

He beat an old Barrera - lost to Morales when Morales still had fire in him.

He beat Hatton....SO???

Get in the ring with Mosley and PBF and he will be 0-2!


:DDD
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by Carbo »

DG. wrote:The guy can barely box! :D

PBF would decision him or stop hit to the body.

Mosley would KO him.

He lost TWICE to JMM!!

He beat an old Barrera - lost to Morales when Morales still had fire in him.

He beat Hatton....SO???

Get in the ring with Mosley and PBF and he will be 0-2!


:DDD
Nurse! He's out again.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by 15829 »

i agree with d.g marquez beat him twice mosley would stop him flyod would beat him wide and beating hatton proved nothing de la hoya was barley able to throw a punch and diaz was by far the weakest of the lightweight champion who got luck against a shot to peices morales
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by DG. »

Carbo wrote:
DG. wrote:The guy can barely box! :D

PBF would decision him or stop hit to the body.

Mosley would KO him.

He lost TWICE to JMM!!

He beat an old Barrera - lost to Morales when Morales still had fire in him.

He beat Hatton....SO???

Get in the ring with Mosley and PBF and he will be 0-2!


:DDD
Nurse! He's out again.

Its the stone cold truth!


The boy is still learning to box!



:DDD
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by DG. »

diggler wrote:i agree with d.g marquez beat him twice mosley would stop him flyod would beat him wide and beating hatton proved nothing de la hoya was barley able to throw a punch and diaz was by far the weakest of the lightweight champion who got luck against a shot to peices morales

Exactly!


:TU:
teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by teddy007 »

Carbo wrote:
DG. wrote:The guy can barely box! :D

PBF would decision him or stop hit to the body.

Mosley would KO him.

He lost TWICE to JMM!!

He beat an old Barrera - lost to Morales when Morales still had fire in him.

He beat Hatton....SO???

Get in the ring with Mosley and PBF and he will be 0-2!


:DDD
Nurse! He's out again.
:lol: but seriously he is over-rated IMO.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by DG. »

teddy007 wrote:
Carbo wrote:
DG. wrote:The guy can barely box! :D

PBF would decision him or stop hit to the body.

Mosley would KO him.

He lost TWICE to JMM!!

He beat an old Barrera - lost to Morales when Morales still had fire in him.

He beat Hatton....SO???

Get in the ring with Mosley and PBF and he will be 0-2!


:DDD
Nurse! He's out again.
:lol: but seriously he is over-rated IMO.
He is!

:DDD
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by Horse »

DG. wrote:Pacman is not p4p anything!
Do you not have Pacquiao in your P4P top 10?

Will Pacquiao be a P4P something if he beats Cotto?
WayoftheCass
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 719
Joined: 09 Oct 2005, 02:22

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by WayoftheCass »

Getting beat twice off of JMM is just your opinion. He crushed Morales twice in rematches and was the reason 'El Terrible' was shot to hell against David Diaz. Barrera went on to claim big wins long after his loss to Pacquiao and nobody ever layed a beating on him like Manny did. If Ricky was so terrible how did he win rounds against PBF?
Oscar also landed probably as many blows against Manny as JMM did against Floyd the other night.
Oh and wasn't Mosley struggling with Ricardo Mayorga until he delivered a final second KO???? As great a fighter as Mayorga is n' all. :-?
You can use facts to support any argument. The fact is that Manny is a former FLYWEIGHT champion who has defeated Barrera, Morales (twice), JMM, Hatton and ODLH! He deserves to be where he is. :TU:
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

He would be top 10 p4p,but i agree with DG he wouldnt beat Mayweather or Mosley....
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by Horse »

Tommy Gunn13 wrote:He would be top 10 p4p,but i agree with DG he wouldnt beat Mayweather or Mosley....
If he can beat Cotto then he can beat those two.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Horse wrote:
Tommy Gunn13 wrote:He would be top 10 p4p,but i agree with DG he wouldnt beat Mayweather or Mosley....
If he can beat Cotto then he can beat those two.
Mayweather would run rings round him&make him look very ordinary
Mosley would beat him on points but nowhere near as convincing
also i think Cotto will be to strong for him&stop him late

Just my opinion :TU:
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by alexpaterson »

I think he is a top 3 p4p fighter at the moment he KO'd a tough David Diaz then beat an albeit weight drained De La Hoya and then beat a natural LWW in Hatton and demolished him he is a very talented boxer. I agree he probably wouldnt beat Mosely or Mayweather but there is no shame in that he is still a very good boxer to move up from Flyweight to Light Welter weight is an achievement in its self but to win titles and beat very good boxers is highly impressive :TU:
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by DG. »

Horse wrote:
Tommy Gunn13 wrote:He would be top 10 p4p,but i agree with DG he wouldnt beat Mayweather or Mosley....
If he can beat Cotto then he can beat those two.
Boxing does not work like that.

Pacman is NOT in my top 10 as a boxer. he can nt box, but he can 'fight' - PBF and Mosley would each him a lesson!

As would a 147lbs cotto!


:DDD
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by DG. »

WayoftheCass wrote:Getting beat twice off of JMM is just your opinion. He crushed Morales twice in rematches and was the reason 'El Terrible' was shot to hell against David Diaz. Barrera went on to claim big wins long after his loss to Pacquiao and nobody ever layed a beating on him like Manny did. If Ricky was so terrible how did he win rounds against PBF?
Oscar also landed probably as many blows against Manny as JMM did against Floyd the other night.
Oh and wasn't Mosley struggling with Ricardo Mayorga until he delivered a final second KO???? As great a fighter as Mayorga is n' all. :-?
You can use facts to support any argument. The fact is that Manny is a former FLYWEIGHT champion who has defeated Barrera, Morales (twice), JMM, Hatton and ODLH! He deserves to be where he is. :TU:
My argument is a 70% Morales beat him.

Barrera was not what he was and what big wins after?


The boy can not box for toffee, lets see him raise his hands in the air after mosley hits him, he would get stretched with his hands in the air.

Pacman is only now begining to attempt to box.

PBF UD12 or late KO

SSM wins by K0 and early!

:DDD
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by J »

usual revisionist bollocks from DG.

we will find out on Nov 18th wont we?
chesh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1095
Joined: 31 May 2007, 16:05

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by chesh »

Floyd has not regained his P4P no. 1 spot by bullying a SMALLER fighter in a boring performance - which is what he did the other night. Pac has earned the top spot by bulling BIGGER fighters in sensational performances.

Pac is faster than Floyd, hits harder and throws bombs from crazy angles which would seriously test even Floyd's defensive skills. P4P Pac is better, but as Floyd seems to have bulked up during his "retirement" his probable in-ring weight advantage of about 10 pounds might even things out in an actual fight. This thread is about P4P, however, and whichever way you look at it, Pac is ahead. More titles in more weight classes, more future Hall of Famers fought and defeated. And, last but not least, Pac ducks no-one.
Last edited by chesh on 22 Sep 2009, 15:38, edited 1 time in total.
youngrell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2381
Joined: 30 Jun 2008, 15:56

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by youngrell »

This is rubbish, Pacman can't box :roll: tell ODLH that. As he knew Oscar was bigger than him, he boxed his ears off, weight drained or not.

Plus you're talking P4P, and then saying he can't beat Mosley or PBF, so what they are bigger than him, he is at a disadvantage from the off against them. Most top Middleweights would beat Mosley and PBF but that doesn't mean they're not P4P material.

If they were the same size it would be a very close call against either.
hayemaker1000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 32
Joined: 09 Sep 2009, 04:44

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by hayemaker1000 »

chesh wrote:Floyd has not regained his P4P no. 1 spot by bullying a SMALLER fighter in a boring performance - which is what he did the other night. Pac has earned the top spot by bulling BIGGER fighters in sensational performances. Pac is faster than Floyd, hits harder and throws bombs from crazy angles which would seriously test even Floyd's defensive skills. P4P Pac is better, but as Floyd seems to have bulked up during his "retirement" his probable in-ring weight advantage of about 10 pounds might even things out in an actual fight. This thread is about P4P, however, and whichever way you look at it, Pac is ahead. More titles in more weight classes, more future Hall of Famers fought and defeated. And, last but not least, Pac ducks no-one.
Floyd regained no. 1 spot even before he fought JMM, as soon as he came out of retirement. What he showed yet again on Sat night was that he is far and away the greatest boxer of this generation. He would humiliate Manny.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

hayemaker1000 wrote:
chesh wrote:Floyd has not regained his P4P no. 1 spot by bullying a SMALLER fighter in a boring performance - which is what he did the other night. Pac has earned the top spot by bulling BIGGER fighters in sensational performances. Pac is faster than Floyd, hits harder and throws bombs from crazy angles which would seriously test even Floyd's defensive skills. P4P Pac is better, but as Floyd seems to have bulked up during his "retirement" his probable in-ring weight advantage of about 10 pounds might even things out in an actual fight. This thread is about P4P, however, and whichever way you look at it, Pac is ahead. More titles in more weight classes, more future Hall of Famers fought and defeated. And, last but not least, Pac ducks no-one.
Floyd regained no. 1 spot even before he fought JMM, as soon as he came out of retirement. What he showed yet again on Sat night was that he is far and away the greatest boxer of this generation. He would humiliate Manny.
totally agree :TU:
chesh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1095
Joined: 31 May 2007, 16:05

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by chesh »

hayemaker1000 wrote:
chesh wrote:Floyd has not regained his P4P no. 1 spot by bullying a SMALLER fighter in a boring performance - which is what he did the other night. Pac has earned the top spot by bulling BIGGER fighters in sensational performances. Pac is faster than Floyd, hits harder and throws bombs from crazy angles which would seriously test even Floyd's defensive skills. P4P Pac is better, but as Floyd seems to have bulked up during his "retirement" his probable in-ring weight advantage of about 10 pounds might even things out in an actual fight. This thread is about P4P, however, and whichever way you look at it, Pac is ahead. More titles in more weight classes, more future Hall of Famers fought and defeated. And, last but not least, Pac ducks no-one.
Floyd regained no. 1 spot even before he fought JMM, as soon as he came out of retirement. What he showed yet again on Sat night was that he is far and away the greatest boxer of this generation. He would humiliate Manny.
You've completely misunderstood my post and the thread topic, i.e. the concept of "pound for pound". Nor have you backed up your statement with any reasoned argument - Mayweather's performance on Saturday night did nothing for his pound for pound status.
WayoftheCass
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 719
Joined: 09 Oct 2005, 02:22

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by WayoftheCass »

DG. wrote:
WayoftheCass wrote:Getting beat twice off of JMM is just your opinion. He crushed Morales twice in rematches and was the reason 'El Terrible' was shot to hell against David Diaz. Barrera went on to claim big wins long after his loss to Pacquiao and nobody ever layed a beating on him like Manny did. If Ricky was so terrible how did he win rounds against PBF?
Oscar also landed probably as many blows against Manny as JMM did against Floyd the other night.
Oh and wasn't Mosley struggling with Ricardo Mayorga until he delivered a final second KO???? As great a fighter as Mayorga is n' all. :-?
You can use facts to support any argument. The fact is that Manny is a former FLYWEIGHT champion who has defeated Barrera, Morales (twice), JMM, Hatton and ODLH! He deserves to be where he is. :TU:
My argument is a 70% Morales beat him.

Barrera was not what he was and what big wins after?


The boy can not box for toffee, lets see him raise his hands in the air after mosley hits him, he would get stretched with his hands in the air.

Pacman is only now begining to attempt to box.

PBF UD12 or late KO

SSM wins by K0 and early!

:DDD

Barrera went on to beat Ayala, Morales, Fana, Peden and Juarez (twice) before dropping a split decision to JMM. Saying he was not what he was is a mute point. You could just as easily say that about all of Mayweather's opponents.

How do you fathom that Morales was 70%?

And Shane would blow him out early? :o

What's that based on? He hasn't won a fight early in over 8 years and fighters like David Estrada and Luis Collazo have taken him the distance without even getting rocked.

I guess I filed your whole argument under 'FAIL' when you came out with the hum-dinger :

"The boy can not box for toffee....." :KO:

That's a joke statement right there. :lol:
The Hawk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 547
Joined: 16 Jan 2004, 21:57

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by The Hawk »

DG. wrote:The guy can barely box! :D

PBF would decision him or stop hit to the body.

Mosley would KO him.

He lost TWICE to JMM!!

He beat an old Barrera - lost to Morales when Morales still had fire in him.

He beat Hatton....SO???

Get in the ring with Mosley and PBF and he will be 0-2!


:DDD
Now Witter is going to Welter, get Witter in with the Pacman DG :lol: :box:
chesh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1095
Joined: 31 May 2007, 16:05

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by chesh »

The Ring Magazine P4P Top 5 as of September 20th 2009:

1. PAC
2. Floyd
3. Mosley
4. B-Hop
5. JMM
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Pacman is not p4p anything!

Post by DG. »

chesh wrote:The Ring Magazine P4P Top 5 as of September 20th 2009:

1. PAC
2. Floyd
3. Mosley
4. B-Hop
5. JMM
Remind me. who owns the Ring these days?

Pac number 1? :lol:

4 fighters associated with GBP ( Mayweather had promoted at least 3 big fights with GBP).


Pac can't box!

:lol:
Post Reply