Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future

Post Reply
lacollier883
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 210
Joined: 20 Sep 2009, 01:34

Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future

Post by lacollier883 »

http://www.BS.com/?m=show&id=23314

Comments and feedback appreciated
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future

Post by twenty six »

Just as a side note, at the end of the sixth round, in the Moore Rhodes fight, Rhodes was ahead on two of the three score cards.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future

Post by 15829 »

its been a bad few weeks for vip fighters, think it will get worse when edwards beats robinson in december
neil hibbert
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 747
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:36

Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future

Post by neil hibbert »

yer true bad few weeks, i know garys chompin at the bit already to get back in with napa!
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future

Post by Deserter »

I know I'm already echoing the thoughts of others on here, but I'm also sick of the 'didn't do enough to take it away from the champion' routine. A boxer either wins the fight or he doesn't as far as I'm concerned. Just being champion shouldn't somehow entitle that fighter to preferential treatment in terms of scoring.
On a more positive note, what's happening with Trevor Crewe? Liked the look of him on the few occasions I saw him last year - compact, powerful and exciting style.
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future

Post by hurlock »

silly to say quigley underperformed & smith only won 3rds???
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future

Post by jonny »

Terry D wrote:I did an int with Quigley last week and he felt the same way. I don't agree with that scoring but the position itself is widespread. I think it is a tool for building/securing rematches. Adds credence to the controversy in the minds of some.

Quigley-Smith I had split at 5-5 going into the final two. Tony thinks he was taking the 11th until the lowblow. I feel that Smith took the 11th and the 12th to seal the fight. It was close but clear.
So your score would be 115/113 to smith, so what was wrong with the scoring then
Night-Nurse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 151
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:28

Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future

Post by Night-Nurse »

Deserter wrote:On a more positive note, what's happening with Trevor Crewe? Liked the look of him on the few occasions I saw him last year - compact, powerful and exciting style.
Hes boxing on November 29th at Colne!
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future

Post by whicker »

twenty six wrote:Just as a side note, at the end of the sixth round, in the Moore Rhodes fight, Rhodes was ahead on two of the three score cards.
That's surprising.

The impression I got from TV was the Moore totally dominated the first half of the fight.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future

Post by crusader »

whicker wrote:
twenty six wrote:Just as a side note, at the end of the sixth round, in the Moore Rhodes fight, Rhodes was ahead on two of the three score cards.
That's surprising.

The impression I got from TV was the Moore totally dominated the first half of the fight.

and several ppl scoring on this forum had it 60-54 Moore or somewhere close. I thought Moore was defantly ahead. It was competitive action, but he was doing more.
Post Reply