http://www.BS.com/?m=show&id=23314
Comments and feedback appreciated
Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future
-
lacollier883
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 210
- Joined: 20 Sep 2009, 01:34
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future
Just as a side note, at the end of the sixth round, in the Moore Rhodes fight, Rhodes was ahead on two of the three score cards.
Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future
its been a bad few weeks for vip fighters, think it will get worse when edwards beats robinson in december
-
neil hibbert
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 747
- Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:36
Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future
yer true bad few weeks, i know garys chompin at the bit already to get back in with napa!
Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future
I know I'm already echoing the thoughts of others on here, but I'm also sick of the 'didn't do enough to take it away from the champion' routine. A boxer either wins the fight or he doesn't as far as I'm concerned. Just being champion shouldn't somehow entitle that fighter to preferential treatment in terms of scoring.
On a more positive note, what's happening with Trevor Crewe? Liked the look of him on the few occasions I saw him last year - compact, powerful and exciting style.
On a more positive note, what's happening with Trevor Crewe? Liked the look of him on the few occasions I saw him last year - compact, powerful and exciting style.
Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future
silly to say quigley underperformed & smith only won 3rds???
Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future
So your score would be 115/113 to smith, so what was wrong with the scoring thenTerry D wrote:I did an int with Quigley last week and he felt the same way. I don't agree with that scoring but the position itself is widespread. I think it is a tool for building/securing rematches. Adds credence to the controversy in the minds of some.
Quigley-Smith I had split at 5-5 going into the final two. Tony thinks he was taking the 11th until the lowblow. I feel that Smith took the 11th and the 12th to seal the fight. It was close but clear.
-
Night-Nurse
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 151
- Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:28
Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future
Hes boxing on November 29th at Colne!Deserter wrote:On a more positive note, what's happening with Trevor Crewe? Liked the look of him on the few occasions I saw him last year - compact, powerful and exciting style.
Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future
That's surprising.twenty six wrote:Just as a side note, at the end of the sixth round, in the Moore Rhodes fight, Rhodes was ahead on two of the three score cards.
The impression I got from TV was the Moore totally dominated the first half of the fight.
Re: Steve Wood speaks on Moore, Quigley, davies and the future
whicker wrote:That's surprising.twenty six wrote:Just as a side note, at the end of the sixth round, in the Moore Rhodes fight, Rhodes was ahead on two of the three score cards.
The impression I got from TV was the Moore totally dominated the first half of the fight.
and several ppl scoring on this forum had it 60-54 Moore or somewhere close. I thought Moore was defantly ahead. It was competitive action, but he was doing more.