ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

will you pay for the Khan bill?

Poll ended at 06 Dec 2009, 12:35

No, will watch it on a stream
31
31%
No, will wait until the replay next week
19
19%
Yes, it is well worth 15 quid
21
21%
No, not bothered about watching a poor mans world title fight
29
29%
 
Total votes: 100

funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by funso banjo baby »

Chambers2 wrote:I'll be buying it with a few mates and I'm quite looking forward to it, Amir gets too much bad press IMO. He's excellente! in terms of his ability and excitement in the square ring and with his profile and backing he should be in numerous massive fight

Amir will go down as a legend IMO

only with terrestrial !!

now he will go down the calzaghe/hatton route... he'll be a household name without any households actually watching him

i agree he has bags of talent




but he was the one british fighter who could have started another golden age for british boxing , with the kind of viewing figures the likes of Benn and Eubank generated on 1tv, 12 -18 million

but then im a true boxing fan

i actually wanted Khan to stay in the amateurs (until the next olympics) , for exactly the same reasons...his presence in the ams would have rejuvenated the sport from grass roots....

instead they followed the quick and easy money

its a shame

ditto all the recent olympians with Warren....drifting in a sordid backwater of alphabets titles, distilled talent, and meagre viewing figures :evil:
Eraserhead
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 554
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 18:46

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Eraserhead »

No way, Jose. Not paying a dime for that rubbish. I like Khan, but it's a poor main event, poor undercard and, aside from Mitchell-Prescott (is this fight even happening?), I'm not remotely interested in anything on this bill.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Chambers2 »

Eraserhead wrote:No way, Jose. Not paying a dime for that rubbish. I like Khan, but it's a poor main event, poor undercard and, aside from Mitchell-Prescott (is this fight even happening?), I'm not remotely interested in anything on this bill.
What makes you think Mitchell-Prescott may not be happening? I'm looking forward to that more than the main event
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Chambers2 »

funso banjo baby wrote:
Chambers2 wrote:I'll be buying it with a few mates and I'm quite looking forward to it, Amir gets too much bad press IMO. He's excellente! in terms of his ability and excitement in the square ring and with his profile and backing he should be in numerous massive fight

Amir will go down as a legend IMO

only with terrestrial !!

now he will go down the calzaghe/hatton route... he'll be a household name without any households actually watching him

i agree he has bags of talent




but he was the one british fighter who could have started another golden age for british boxing , with the kind of viewing figures the likes of Benn and Eubank generated on 1tv, 12 -18 million

but then im a true boxing fan

i actually wanted Khan to stay in the amateurs (until the next olympics) , for exactly the same reasons...his presence in the ams would have rejuvenated the sport from grass roots....

instead they followed the quick and easy money

its a shame

ditto all the recent olympians with Warren....drifting in a sordid backwater of alphabets titles, distilled talent, and meagre viewing figures :evil:
If we had to rely on terrestrial TV to make boxing legends then we'd be pretty fooking short of them in last few decades. Terrestrial TV are just not interested in the sport and you're demented if you think that any UK TV programme will get anywhere near 12-18m viewers
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

someone remind me why I am supposed to care about allegedly's glass chinned wunderkind's latest effort on his painful, meticulously planned and ever so slow route to finally getting sparked again, let alone waste my own energy and the energy used by the television, in addition to PAYING FOR IT?

Pleaaase put this guy in with Marquez and be done with it all for good.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Adamj1987 »

I'm off to a bar to watch it with some mates :TU:
Fatsam
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 13 Jun 2008, 11:14

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Fatsam »

I'll be getting it, but like others i am more interested in the mitchell prescott fight.
hitman09
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1838
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 10:39

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by hitman09 »

Chambers2 wrote: Amir will go down as a legend IMO
:lol: :lol: :lol:
banger
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 24 Sep 2009, 11:28

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by banger »

got sky plus hd and a 46 inch samsung but im gona watch it on a stream on my 10 inch netbook thats how much i think of amir khan the over hyped over protected over self important t.s :oo .er
hitman09
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1838
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 10:39

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by hitman09 »

sg1985 wrote:
banger wrote:got sky plus hd and a 46 inch samsung but im gona watch it on a stream on my 10 inch netbook thats how much i think of amir khan the over hyped over protected over self important t.s :oo .er
Why bother watching it at all?
Exactly. I'm not.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Hagler2002 »

Anyone else having trouble booking this over Sky HD? It's only giving me the option to book the repeats on the Sunday.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by oliverfennell »

banjo wrote:
sg1985 wrote:I don't mind paying for fights occasionally, I very rarely do, we hardly ever have ppv here, although there have been more in the last couple of years, I miss Setanta!
The only PPV's we have in this country seem to be when a British fighter is involved. We got Pacquiao v Cotto, Mayweather v Marquez, Mayweather v Oscar, Mayweather v Gatti, Mayweather v Baldomir, Hopkins v Tarver, Morales v Pacquiao I & II all on normal Sky Sports but they charged 15 quid for Khan v Prescott :KO:

And I bet Pacquiao v Oscar would have been on Sky Sports had Khan not been fighting Oisin Fagan on the same night which gave Sky the excuse to combine the two and sell it as one show on SBO.
Hopkins-ODLH and their preceding double-header, as well as most Tyson fights post-Bruno 2, were UK PPV.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Hagler2002 »

oliverfennell wrote:
banjo wrote:
sg1985 wrote:I don't mind paying for fights occasionally, I very rarely do, we hardly ever have ppv here, although there have been more in the last couple of years, I miss Setanta!
The only PPV's we have in this country seem to be when a British fighter is involved. We got Pacquiao v Cotto, Mayweather v Marquez, Mayweather v Oscar, Mayweather v Gatti, Mayweather v Baldomir, Hopkins v Tarver, Morales v Pacquiao I & II all on normal Sky Sports but they charged 15 quid for Khan v Prescott :KO:

And I bet Pacquiao v Oscar would have been on Sky Sports had Khan not been fighting Oisin Fagan on the same night which gave Sky the excuse to combine the two and sell it as one show on SBO.
Hopkins-ODLH and their preceding double-header, as well as most Tyson fights post-Bruno 2, were UK PPV.
As were most Lennox Lewis fights and he was Canadian.
princess
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 900
Joined: 06 Oct 2009, 18:11

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by princess »

We pay for Sky shouldnt have to pay PPV as well
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Hagler2002 »

princess wrote:We pay for Sky shouldnt have to pay PPV as well
We get off lightly, take a look at what the yanks pay :o
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Finn »

sg1985 wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:
princess wrote:We pay for Sky shouldnt have to pay PPV as well
We get off lightly, take a look at what the yanks pay :o
And we get most of the big American fights for free.
And with the new law they're trying to pass we'll get all fights of national importance for free apparently.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Hagler2002 »

kingfinn wrote:
sg1985 wrote:
And with the new law they're trying to pass we'll get all fights of national importance for free apparently.
Like when they stated sky were a monopoly regarding the Premiership and but the rights up for a % of matches over the season, Setanta won them and it ended up costing more to watch them all having to pay for 2 subscriptions :o
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Hagler2002 »

sg1985 wrote:
kingfinn wrote:
And with the new law they're trying to pass we'll get all fights of national importance for free apparently.
:o

What law?
The Ashes & England football internationals should be broadcast on terrestrial TV according to the government, no chance of boxing been added to the list.
Pat Butcher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 227
Joined: 06 Jul 2008, 04:40

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Pat Butcher »

Hagler2002 wrote:
sg1985 wrote:
kingfinn wrote:
And with the new law they're trying to pass we'll get all fights of national importance for free apparently.
:o

What law?
The Ashes & England football internationals should be broadcast on terrestrial TV according to the government, no chance of boxing been added to the list.
Election talk
Pat Butcher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 227
Joined: 06 Jul 2008, 04:40

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Pat Butcher »

I'll be buying it, good card and as others have said a cheap night in and on at a decent hour.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Hagler2002 »

£15 in house or £70 for a Saturday night out 3 weeks before xmas, simple maths.


Whoooosh £10 a bottle of voddie at Tesco's :box:
banger
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 24 Sep 2009, 11:28

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by banger »

sg1985 wrote:
banger wrote:got sky plus hd and a 46 inch samsung but im gona watch it on a stream on my 10 inch netbook thats how much i think of amir khan the over hyped over protected over self important t.s :oo .er
Why bother watching it at all?
love my boxing but not having my trousers pulled down by fwank. ;;-)
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by n1ebf »

a PPV matchup should be contested by 2 legitimate stars with legitimate credentials and this one isn't I feel. I am a Khan fan and I like this bill. But you're correct. It is a big shaft job. If I had Sky I would end up buying it of that I'm sure. Seeing as I couldn't get accomm sorted in Newcastle to go, I shall be wathing in the local Pool hall who usually show the fights.

my predictons.

Khan on Points. Possibly having to pick himself up in the 4th.

Prescott in 8. :verysad:

Simpson by round 6 stoppage.

Enzo to get beat.

Degale to get booed.

Artur and Wright I am going to say Arthur on points having rocked Wright once or twice.
jtourettes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 822
Joined: 20 Feb 2009, 07:24

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by jtourettes »

As long as someone in my block/street has ordered it, I should pick it up for free on my dodgy box. If not I could be tempted as I'm not going out tonight. Having said that, I think the local might be showing it so that could be the cheaper option.
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: ok, so who is and isnt paying for the Khan PPV?

Post by Finch »

What a shit show.
Post Reply