Midland area title

el torro · Post by **el torro** » 07 Dec 2009, 14:03

Anyone know the result of the midland area title fight between martin concepcion and max maxwell on saturday?

Andy · Post by **Andy** » 07 Dec 2009, 15:27

Concepcion won 96-95

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 07 Dec 2009, 16:30

mexican roadsweeper wrote:Concepcion won 96-95

Sounds like it was a close one...

Andy · Post by **Andy** » 07 Dec 2009, 17:45

A fight report is available on Leicester Mercury's site. Click sports, then other sports and scroll down.
Tried to post the link but had no joy :(

Asterix · Post by **Asterix** » 07 Dec 2009, 17:54

Here: http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/s ... ticle.html

Andy · Post by **Andy** » 07 Dec 2009, 18:05

Wouldn't flippin do it when I tried to link.

princess · Post by **princess** » 07 Dec 2009, 18:28

Max was ripped off even the promoter thought Conception lost Jon Pegg Max,s trainer has put a letter of complaint into the board Doubt whether it will do any good These refs are getting away with it all to often Max is thinking of retiring he is so pissed off He worked so hard just to be shafted by the ref

Counter-puncher · Post by **Counter-puncher** » 08 Dec 2009, 11:02

princess wrote:Max was ripped off even the promoter thought Conception lost Jon Pegg Max,s trainer has put a letter of complaint into the board Doubt whether it will do any good These refs are getting away with it all to often Max is thinking of retiring he is so pissed off He worked so hard just to be shafted by the ref

not t he first time Max has had a raw deal

jonp · Post by **jonp** » 08 Dec 2009, 15:10

This was worse than any of the other close fights max has lost first time iv ever put a complaint in ,only good thing is is how well he boxed he realy matured as a fighter the other night just hope we can motivate him to carry on.

Counter-puncher · Post by **Counter-puncher** » 09 Dec 2009, 07:24

jonp wrote:This was worse than any of the other close fights max has lost first time iv ever put a complaint in ,only good thing is is how well he boxed he realy matured as a fighter the other night just hope we can motivate him to carry on.

i hope he sticks with it jon, nice fella and its good to hear he is improving still.

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 09 Dec 2009, 14:24

jonp wrote:This was worse than any of the other close fights max has lost first time iv ever put a complaint in ,only good thing is is how well he boxed he realy matured as a fighter the other night just hope we can motivate him to carry on.

Tell him not to let the bastards grind him down and point him at Ian Napas career

jonp · Post by **jonp** » 09 Dec 2009, 15:09

I used Steve robinson as an example and ritchy told him yr either gonna be the guy who lets it get to him or yr gonna be the guy who taks his best performance and works on it that way.Max was back in the gym tuesday training hard so hopefully hes gonna just dig deeper

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 10 Dec 2009, 05:36

jonp wrote:I used Steve robinson as an example and ritchy told him yr either gonna be the guy who lets it get to him or yr gonna be the guy who taks his best performance and works on it that way.Max was back in the gym tuesday training hard so hopefully hes gonna just dig deeper

Good work, Max couldn't be that unlucky twice on the trot

jonp · Post by **jonp** » 10 Dec 2009, 14:42

lol he lost by one point in glasgow the week before with the infamous kenny pringle refereeing so hes not the luckiest guy.

jonp · Post by **jonp** » 11 Dec 2009, 06:45

Just read the boxing news report ???? what a joke when are they going to send unbiased officials to fights this guy writes for the leicester post as well and knows the concepions personally and is a fan

He makes his biased attitude known when he say " It was justice done for the family after elder sibling kevin was EDGED out of a midlands title fight by tony randall early last month"

Anyone who was there has sed the offical scorline in favour of randell by FOUR points was generous to concepion yet this clown states justice for the family after he was edged out.

People like Craig birch should not be reporting on people they know socially if they cant keep it unbiased cmon boxing news get a grip.

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 11 Dec 2009, 07:00

jonp wrote:lol he lost by one point in glasgow the week before with the infamous kenny pringle refereeing so hes not the luckiest guy.

Oh

He couldn't be that unlucky three times on the trot

el torro · Post by **el torro** » 11 Dec 2009, 07:28

jonp wrote:Just read the boxing news report ???? what a joke when are they going to send unbiased officials to fights this guy writes for the leicester post as well and knows the concepions personally and is a fan

He makes his biased attitude known when he say " It was justice done for the family after elder sibling kevin was EDGED out of a midlands title fight by tony randall early last month"

Anyone who was there has sed the offical scorline in favour of randell by FOUR points was generous to concepion yet this clown states justice for the family after he was edged out.

People like Craig birch should not be reporting on people they know socially if they cant keep it unbiased cmon boxing news get a grip.

I suppose your opinion isn't unbiased is it

jonp · Post by **jonp** » 11 Dec 2009, 07:38

Im a trainer commenting on a fighter from my gym of course it.My point is im not writing for a the national trade paper which is used by people for refence on ratings and appeals and complaint and the like.

Also it turns out he played on the same footy team as one of the concepions ,is from leicester and has martin on his facebook page.That would be fine if he was his trainer commeting on a forum or making a complaint the fact that hes the unbiased journalist for a respected trade paper is the bit that seems kind of weird.

Torro you yrself being a concepion fan id have no problem with being biased but to be a reporter you have to raise yrself above this kind of thing.

Just like to say this is the first complaint iv ever put in and first time iv realy gone overbard about a decision so i think that show im prepared to accept close decisions

el torro · Post by **el torro** » 11 Dec 2009, 08:15

Fair point. I never realised the reporter and martin were friends.

Having not seen the fight I just want to read an accurate report.

Just out of interest how would you have scored it?

jonp · Post by **jonp** » 11 Dec 2009, 21:44

I always try to score fights with any close rounds against us thats why when max lost by a point and two points to rob kenny and and tony randall (boxing news had him winning both by the way) we could see how it could have been scored against us and didnt make a fuss.
This one and ritchy woodhall in the corner had it the same i had 6.3.1 in rounds as max took very little cleanly coming out against a puncher like martin without a mark over ten shows a good defence.
Respected matchmaker Jimmy Gill who was in the crowd had max a winner by two and he sed he was taking into account he was the away fighter.

Full respect to martin concepction whos such a game skillfull lad hes never had a break i just wish it hadnt come at the expense of another lad who dont seem to have a lot of luck ie 3 midland title fights all cloe with a fair share of people thinking hed done enough and not one goes his way .The first two he was the home lad as well.

sorry to keep going on but like i say not one to moan before and this one kind of got to me.

My last moan anyway thanks for listening lol

Counter-puncher · Post by **Counter-puncher** » 12 Dec 2009, 05:03

fair play jon and all the best to Max

Midland area title

Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title

Re: Midland area title