british middleweights - whos best
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Have you ever had press in watching an taking part in your traning routine like danny flexen did when following around rendall munroe for the day?Mooresy wrote: Good call
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Yes had a couple of the local press holding pads and wearing the body belt. The guy from MUTV was petrified!!Adamj1987 wrote:Have you ever had press in watching an taking part in your traning routine like danny flexen did when following around rendall munroe for the day?Mooresy wrote: Good call
Never sparred though coz it's usually too close to a fight to risk any injuries.
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Just wonderedMooresy wrote: Yes had a couple of the local press holding pads and wearing the body belt. The guy from MUTV was petrified!!![]()
Never sparred though coz it's usually too close to a fight to risk any injuries.
well once i get a new dictor phone to replace the 1 some1 stole that ha dmy gavin rees interview on
Re: british middleweights - whos best
If you fancy a trip over to our gym after christmas PM me and we'll arrange it, end of Jan/feb should be good.Adamj1987 wrote:Just wonderedMooresy wrote: Yes had a couple of the local press holding pads and wearing the body belt. The guy from MUTV was petrified!!![]()
Never sparred though coz it's usually too close to a fight to risk any injuries.i'm trying to find out how often fighters let reports do this because i wouldnt midn doing it for a peice for boxrec news 1 day.
well once i get a new dictor phone to replace the 1 some1 stole that ha dmy gavin rees interview on
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Would love to get over to the Gym myself Moorsey sometime!
For me Barker the top middleweight in the UK (brilliant technician). Closely floowed by Macklin.
Would be nice to see how Jamie goes thoughat the higher weight.
For me Barker the top middleweight in the UK (brilliant technician). Closely floowed by Macklin.
Would be nice to see how Jamie goes thoughat the higher weight.
-
craigjenkins05
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 477
- Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03
Re: british middleweights - whos best
its easy to blame weight after a loss but he didnt look bad in his last 3 fights so i just find it funny it comes into play after a loss
Re: british middleweights - whos best
As Jamie has said, his weight making issues would have come to the fore in his previous 3 fights if they weren't over so quickliy (KO2,KO2, KO3), he 'looked' very tight at the weight in those contests IMOcraigjenkins05 wrote:its easy to blame weight after a loss but he didnt look bad in his last 3 fights so i just find it funny it comes into play after a loss
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Chambers already answered your post in the way i would have, and i understand where your coming from, but you have to understand that if i was to DECLARE i was struggling at the weight, then everyone who knows anything about it would do what Rhodes did and ride out the storm and wait for the already low tank to run out completely. I could have been a tit about it in the post fight interview and said the ONLY reason Ryan beat me was i was weak from the weight, but that would have been disrespectful to him, and also wrong, because he fought a clever fight and showed a good defence, chin, resilience, and that they had a good gameplan. It's not an excuse, just the truth.craigjenkins05 wrote:its easy to blame weight after a loss but he didnt look bad in his last 3 fights so i just find it funny it comes into play after a loss
Re: british middleweights - whos best
[/quote]I wanted to do that for BBN, Ads. I sent out a group text to all the local boxers. It read, 'You bunch of F-ing tarts. I'll take youse all on next time I'm down the gym', I was blind drunk at the time but got locked into it. So I went to the gyms, you've never heard of so many skinheads having to bob off to, 'Wash my hair', as wot did when I swaggered into the room and offered them all out.
Only person to take me up on the offer was Mooresy -- I've been avoiding him ever since. Interviews with J-Mo that are supposedly done by me are actually conducted my cousin, Jim 'Jack' Jones, and sent to me under the cover of darkness. Don't think that Mooresy is onto me yet. I got away with that one.
We'll keep that between you, me and the entire British boxing community.
You crafty fornicator Dooly! Thought that stick on shaggy beard was too good to be true!! Good disguise though!
Forgot about that TBH, new date and venue TBA shortly!!
Re: british middleweights - whos best
I'll give you a 12 round headstart. I'll arrive sometime after the final bell, preferably after you've left the arena, gone home, and then gone on holiday![]()
Shaved my head and everything but I'm still 'Shaggy' wherever I go, must totally look the part!
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: british middleweights - whos best
absolute quality answer MooresyMooresy wrote:Chambers already answered your post in the way i would have, and i understand where your coming from, but you have to understand that if i was to DECLARE i was struggling at the weight, then everyone who knows anything about it would do what Rhodes did and ride out the storm and wait for the already low tank to run out completely. I could have been a tit about it in the post fight interview and said the ONLY reason Ryan beat me was i was weak from the weight, but that would have been disrespectful to him, and also wrong, because he fought a clever fight and showed a good defence, chin, resilience, and that they had a good gameplan. It's not an excuse, just the truth.craigjenkins05 wrote:its easy to blame weight after a loss but he didnt look bad in his last 3 fights so i just find it funny it comes into play after a loss
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Martin is a mate of mine and trains in our gym at Olivers so that one won't be happenin! sorry.christymetcalfe1 wrote:mooresy if ur moving up weight before u get involved with the big guns arrange a fight with martin murray i would absolutely love to watch that one think murrays got alot of talent
Re: british middleweights - whos best
He's coming along great and i think he'll win the british title definately, he's 26/27? i think so he's gonna be moving up soon into championship class and i think you'll see him improve with the opposition.christymetcalfe1 wrote:ahh, thought that was a possibility being hes from manchester, shame cos i highly rate him and think he could make waves, what are your opinions on his skill, he has a similar style to yourself
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Barker and Macklin just edge Mooresy for me at the moment as he is unproven at the weight, but I can see him making an impact and possibly winning a title.
I'll plump for Barker for now, I like his style....
I'll plump for Barker for now, I like his style....
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Barker the best! would be great to see barker-macklin but i cant see it now. Barker is 3 fights from being world champ! Good luck!!!!!!!
-
ImElvis666
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 87
- Joined: 13 Oct 2009, 17:13
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Gonna go with the general consensus here and say it's a toss up between Macklin and Barker. Barker is much more skilled but Mack is tough as nails and has bounced back in fantastic fashion since his loss to Moore. Macklin trumps Barker in the power department too. I think McEwan and Lee (who is Irish) could very well be at those two boys level in a year or so.
-
slapbangwhallop
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27
Re: british middleweights - whos best
You acted with a lot of class in the post fight interview Jamie. I could see that you wanted to come straight out and highlight the weight issue but you didnt and it appeared that you did so to not try and take anything away from Ryan on "his big night". I thought it was very humble and classy of you.Mooresy wrote:Chambers already answered your post in the way i would have, and i understand where your coming from, but you have to understand that if i was to DECLARE i was struggling at the weight, then everyone who knows anything about it would do what Rhodes did and ride out the storm and wait for the already low tank to run out completely. I could have been a tit about it in the post fight interview and said the ONLY reason Ryan beat me was i was weak from the weight, but that would have been disrespectful to him, and also wrong, because he fought a clever fight and showed a good defence, chin, resilience, and that they had a good gameplan. It's not an excuse, just the truth.craigjenkins05 wrote:its easy to blame weight after a loss but he didnt look bad in his last 3 fights so i just find it funny it comes into play after a loss
Re: british middleweights - whos best
ImElvis666 wrote:Gonna go with the general consensus here and say it's a toss up between Macklin and Barker. Barker is much more skilled but Mack is tough as nails and has bounced back in fantastic fashion since his loss to Moore. Macklin trumps Barker in the power department too. I think McEwan and Lee (who is Irish) could very well be at those two boys level in a year or so.
I think we can judge Mcewan better after his next few fights as far as i know hes going to fight twice in the next 6months hes picking it up now, but as it stands now with withs on paper i dont c u how u can say barker is better.