british middleweights - whos best
Re: british middleweights - whos best
i think the 2 that stand out are barker and macklin you cant compare moore yet as hes not fought at the weight, barker macklin would be a great british fight hopefully they fight in a world title unification fight i think barker would win but it would be very close who knows maybe the could have a trilogy
Re: british middleweights - whos best
barker -mackin
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Barker he would box the ears of Macklin then stop him late...
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: british middleweights - whos best
your having a laugh aint u,might be learning the trade in the USA...Barker&Macklin would beat him easy...christymetcalfe1 wrote:no mention of mcewan, arguably the best out and out boxer
-
alexpaterson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4310
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Yep very good times for British Middleweights. IMO Barker is the best so technically sound and has power and is very well schooled, McKeown and Lee has shown good potensial but not on the same level as Barker and Macklin.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: british middleweights - whos best
including Jamie Moore,Barker would beat both...billy bessey wrote:Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Barker he would box the ears of Macklin then stop him late...
x2 Barker is so well schooled i dont think theres anyone to touch him
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Barker IMO
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Higher level,whos Mcewen beat other than Vera????christymetcalfe1 wrote:a perfectly accept and understand people saying macklin would beat them, but why would anyone be so sure barker beats mcewan, mcewan fought a much higher level of opposition and still undefeated like barker
-
ourkid1984
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 351
- Joined: 18 Jun 2009, 12:14
Re: british middleweights - whos best
All very good fighters, if Moore brings his speed and adds a bit of power he could well give Macklin or Barker a good fight.
Although Mcewan might have the potential to get to the standard of Barker or Macklin in the future, I don't think he is at that evel yet and won't be for a year or 2 and in that time both Barker and Macklin will be fighting for world titles in my opinion.
The other thing to point out is that the middleweight division is not as good world level as people make out, the best ones are either getting old or looking at moving up to super middle, perfect time for British based boxers to take advantage I think, especially by beating some top rated boxers.
Although Mcewan might have the potential to get to the standard of Barker or Macklin in the future, I don't think he is at that evel yet and won't be for a year or 2 and in that time both Barker and Macklin will be fighting for world titles in my opinion.
The other thing to point out is that the middleweight division is not as good world level as people make out, the best ones are either getting old or looking at moving up to super middle, perfect time for British based boxers to take advantage I think, especially by beating some top rated boxers.
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Hate to be a moaning Micheal but what is Andy Lees name doing in the opening post? Don't know how many times it has to be said but he is not British! Its like callin David Haye Irish.
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Traitor!Chambers2 wrote:Barker IMO
The correct answer is Birmingham's Matthew Macklin.
(biased, moi?..)
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Barker but Macklin would give him a better argument than some think.
Re: british middleweights - whos best
I think its between barker and mcewan, both were outstanding amatures and both look good in pros, its hard to compare as craig is stateside so there in no common oppositionm craigs there best wins are VERA,STOVAL AND PARISON, thats as good as barkers three surely?
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Darren Barker.
Though, I would have said Jamie Moore had he beaten Ryan Rhodes.
Though, I would have said Jamie Moore had he beaten Ryan Rhodes.
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

Re: british middleweights - whos best
pity the Irishman would knock his ass out first!Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Barker he would box the ears of Macklin then stop him late...
-
MrBoxingUK2
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 960
- Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 14:13
Re: british middleweights - whos best
barker is the bizzzzzness he would school macklin and ko him late
Re: british middleweights - whos best
barker is by far the best boxer, but his chin is questionable, so it depends if he gets careless enough to get caught, or, whether anyone is good enough to catch him..
i think macklin would stop barker... just my take on things.
i think macklin would stop barker... just my take on things.
Re: british middleweights - whos best
The major factor in me losing to Ryan was the weight, so i'll be much better at middle. (right hook in the 7th didn't help the cause though!!
)
Lets see how Barker copes when he's in with someone who can pose him problems. Everyone looks good hitting the bags.
Lets see how Barker copes when he's in with someone who can pose him problems. Everyone looks good hitting the bags.
Macklin's got a much better resume at the minute.skelp wrote:Darren Barker.
Though, I would have said Jamie Moore had he beaten Ryan Rhodes.
Last edited by Mooresy on 08 Dec 2009, 05:42, edited 1 time in total.
Re: british middleweights - whos best
No one has it easy with me pal behave yourself.bob99 wrote:Barker would easily beat Moore.
Re: british middleweights - whos best
TerribleTerry wrote:Traitor!Chambers2 wrote:Barker IMO![]()
![]()
The correct answer is Birmingham's Matthew Macklin.
(biased, moi?..)
Yeah that's what I meant Macklin or Barker
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Lirva you predictable foolbob99 wrote:Barker would easily beat Moore.
-
bob99
- Heavyweight

Re: british middleweights - whos best
So you'd pick Moore in that fight? Were you also picking Moore against Paul Williams on this forum if i recall?TerribleTerry wrote:Lirva you predictable foolbob99 wrote:Barker would easily beat Moore.
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Mooresy wrote:No one has it easy with me pal behave yourself.bob99 wrote:Barker would easily beat Moore.
perhaps lirva/bob should step into the ring with you and then barker and see who knocks him down the most in sparring
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Good callAdamj1987 wrote:Mooresy wrote:No one has it easy with me pal behave yourself.bob99 wrote:Barker would easily beat Moore.![]()
perhaps lirva/bob should step into the ring with you and then barker and see who knocks him down the most in sparring
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: british middleweights - whos best
Never commented on a Moore v Williams fight, as I recall.bob99 wrote:So you'd pick Moore in that fight? Were you also picking Moore against Paul Williams on this forum if i recall?TerribleTerry wrote:Lirva you predictable foolbob99 wrote:Barker would easily beat Moore.
I was not commenting on your choice in the Moore v Barker match up, just the way you phrased it in an obvious attempt to rile a respected pro fighter who posts on here - you lack the intelligance to hide your weak trolling for more than a handful of posts.
Back to the hinterlands for you, d1ckhead.