Unlike previous interviews, eastman seems to have ditched the 'I was robbed' version of events, and stated that there were a lot of goings on 'behind the scenes' that led him to a 'false sense of security.'
I'm not sure how to interpret that. maybe he's looked at fight tapes and seen that he didn't do enough to win it, or he realises that that line isn't going to wash too well, interesting that he's changed his line.
He seemed determined, but I'm not sure whether he really believed that Hopkins isn't the #1 p4p, perhaps he was trying to not give him too much credit, after all he's there to beat him.
Interesting interview on maxboxing with eastman.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
God when I read something like that it reminds me what a corrupt sport boxing is.stujones wrote:Mmm I'll have to watch the fight again, the only thing I can interpret from that was one of two things.
1) Don King gave him lots of "big promises" and he assumed that only a KO would cost him the fight.
2) His cornermen at the time where potraying that he was winning the fight handily.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
it's good mainly for the world scene, you get a lot of videos and interviews which you don't get as a non-member. There's also a lot of articles which get unlocked. when you consider it's only what 2.50 a month, I reckon it's worth it. I get my membership for free because I write for them, but honestly I think it's pretty cheap.