Proof reader for my interviews needed
Proof reader for my interviews needed
Anyone want to volunteer for it? i have 3 interviews scheduled between now and sat which means i wont have as long to proof read them as i have had
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
checking for spelling and grammer mistakesMachoMan09 wrote:wot is a proof reeder?
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
i understand the ironeyMachoMan09 wrote:![]()
That one went right over your head.
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
an hourly sence of good willMachoMan09 wrote:D
What is the hourly rate?
-
lacollier883
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 210
- Joined: 20 Sep 2009, 01:34
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
Why not pass it to your editor or assistant editor
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
i dont want to be wasting there time as they are busy and i am not the best as it islacollier883 wrote:Why not pass it to your editor or assistant editor
-
lacollier883
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 210
- Joined: 20 Sep 2009, 01:34
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
I'm stumped then, thought Ian or Ben would be the best bet.Adamj1987 wrote:i dont want to be wasting there time as they are busy and i am not the best as it islacollier883 wrote:Why not pass it to your editor or assistant editor
Who proof read your brian rose one, could you not ask them
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
my mum and ian edited it, i wouldnt be asking but due to people reschedueling ive ended up with 3 in a week which is abit much to get proof read when ian is proof reading everyone elses contributionslacollier883 wrote:I'm stumped then, thought Ian or Ben would be the best bet.Adamj1987 wrote:i dont want to be wasting there time as they are busy and i am not the best as it islacollier883 wrote:Why not pass it to your editor or assistant editor
Who proof read your brian rose one, could you not ask them
-
lacollier883
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 210
- Joined: 20 Sep 2009, 01:34
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
Whilst you might be conducting the interviews this week do they all need to be typed up and ready to go if your pushed for time.Adamj1987 wrote:my mum and ian edited it, i wouldnt be asking but due to people reschedueling ive ended up with 3 in a week which is abit much to get proof read when ian is proof reading everyone elses contributionslacollier883 wrote:I'm stumped then, thought Ian or Ben would be the best bet.Adamj1987 wrote: i dont want to be wasting there time as they are busy and i am not the best as it is
Who proof read your brian rose one, could you not ask them
Why not spread them out so the work load is easier
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
I nominate TERENCE DOOLEY - the best in the business.MachoMan09 wrote:So you want to waste our time instead.Adamj1987 wrote:i dont want to be wasting there time as they are busy and i am not the best as it islacollier883 wrote:Why not pass it to your editor or assistant editor![]()
Only joking. I am not reliable and I am also quite selfish. There must be somebody around who has a heart.
£20.00 ph - split 50/50 with DG.
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
1 im doing now and 1 is tomorrow so i need to get them off asap and then 1 on sat ill space em out as best i canlacollier883 wrote:Whilst you might be conducting the interviews this week do they all need to be typed up and ready to go if your pushed for time.Adamj1987 wrote:my mum and ian edited it, i wouldnt be asking but due to people reschedueling ive ended up with 3 in a week which is abit much to get proof read when ian is proof reading everyone elses contributionslacollier883 wrote: I'm stumped then, thought Ian or Ben would be the best bet.
Who proof read your brian rose one, could you not ask them
Why not spread them out so the work load is easier
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
id like to say thank you for all the PM's i've recieved it greatly apreciated
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
Just submit them as usual, Adam.
Ben or I will sort them. As for your own progress, it's one of those learning humps that you just have to do yourself over time...if you haven't got time now, don't worry. Do a non-time sensitive piece and have a good go at that.
Ben or I will sort them. As for your own progress, it's one of those learning humps that you just have to do yourself over time...if you haven't got time now, don't worry. Do a non-time sensitive piece and have a good go at that.
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
Laugh in your Dreams Terry Dont think the queue would be that big lolTerry D wrote:DG. wrote:I nominate TERENCE DOOLEY - the best in the business.MachoMan09 wrote: So you want to waste our time instead.![]()
Only joking. I am not reliable and I am also quite selfish. There must be somebody around who has a heart.
![]()
£20.00 ph - split 50/50 with DG.Wouldn't get out of bed for that money. Would get into bed for £50 ph. Ladies, form an orderly queue, or wrestle naked for the honour -- I'm easy.
Ba dum tish. You rack 'em up, DeeG!
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
It's not wasting their time, it's their job. Writers write, editors edit. In that latter regard, that's where a great many websites lose credibility vs printed media. However, thankfully Ian McNeilly is one of the few website editors out there who does give submitted copy a going-over instead of just whacking it up verbatim.Adamj1987 wrote:i dont want to be wasting there time as they are busy and i am not the best as it islacollier883 wrote:Why not pass it to your editor or assistant editor
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5455
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
I`ll do one for you. No worries.
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
Once its on the site, I'd just make a little time to compare the 'McNeilly-fied' version to your original. Highlighting the differences is a very useful exercise, and one that came from the topoliverfennell wrote:It's not wasting their time, it's their job. Writers write, editors edit. In that latter regard, that's where a great many websites lose credibility vs printed media. However, thankfully Ian McNeilly is one of the few website editors out there who does give submitted copy a going-over instead of just whacking it up verbatim.Adamj1987 wrote:i dont want to be wasting there time as they are busy and i am not the best as it islacollier883 wrote:Why not pass it to your editor or assistant editor
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
Adam if you're stuck mate feel free to bung one over via e-mail and I'll take a look this aft.....
[email protected]...
[email protected]...
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
Exactly that ^JamesH wrote:Once its on the site, I'd just make a little time to compare the 'McNeilly-fied' version to your original. Highlighting the differences is a very useful exercise, and one that came from the topoliverfennell wrote:It's not wasting their time, it's their job. Writers write, editors edit. In that latter regard, that's where a great many websites lose credibility vs printed media. However, thankfully Ian McNeilly is one of the few website editors out there who does give submitted copy a going-over instead of just whacking it up verbatim.Adamj1987 wrote: i dont want to be wasting there time as they are busy and i am not the best as it is
Compare the two versions, recognise and understand the differences, and I'd also recommend reading as much as you can of the printed media. It may "old fashioned", but in general terms a piece in a magazine or newspaper will still be of a higher quality than a website. In any craft or art, the consumption of it is as important as your own production of it.
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
i have been doing thatJamesH wrote:Once its on the site, I'd just make a little time to compare the 'McNeilly-fied' version to your original. Highlighting the differences is a very useful exercise, and one that came from the topoliverfennell wrote:It's not wasting their time, it's their job. Writers write, editors edit. In that latter regard, that's where a great many websites lose credibility vs printed media. However, thankfully Ian McNeilly is one of the few website editors out there who does give submitted copy a going-over instead of just whacking it up verbatim.Adamj1987 wrote: i dont want to be wasting there time as they are busy and i am not the best as it is
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Proof reader for my interviews needed
You're welcome mate! :)