hamed v fenech
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: hamed v fenech
I really think the activity level here absolutely slaughters Hamed. Fenech just swarms him, IMO. It's not a good matching for a fella famous for picking his spots, & throwing one punch at a time. A good, stiff, consistent jab is counted among the best ways to trouble a busy fighter, particularly one fond of getting right into your chest. Hamed didn't have it. It's obvious the guy has the power to discourage Fenech, but not the required intensity. This much, & one thing more --- in out-right terms, Fenech was a much better fighter than Hamed ever was.adamheight wrote:at featherweight?
In short, Australia beats England in sport...again
-
adamheight
- Editor

- Posts: 1734
- Joined: 03 Apr 2008, 02:28
Re: hamed v fenech
lets see how u boys go in the world cup!Goodnight, Irene wrote:I really think the activity level here absolutely slaughters Hamed. Fenech just swarms him, IMO. It's not a good matching for a fella famous for picking his spots, & throwing one punch at a time. A good, stiff, consistent jab is counted among the best ways to trouble a busy fighter, particularly one fond of getting right into your chest. Hamed didn't have it. It's obvious the guy has the power to discourage Fenech, but not the required intensity. This much, & one thing more --- in out-right terms, Fenech was a much better fighter than Hamed ever was.adamheight wrote:at featherweight?
In short, Australia beats England in sport...againD
but i am inclined to agree, i think fenech would be too much for hamed. if u look at the amount of times hamed was dropped u can only imagine what fenech would do to him
-
allworld80
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3468
- Joined: 09 Dec 2006, 20:12
Re: hamed v fenech
Hamed will forever be overrated. Fenech gets the stoppage here.
Re: hamed v fenech
Haha you are not even the best cricket team anymoreGoodnight, Irene wrote:I really think the activity level here absolutely slaughters Hamed. Fenech just swarms him, IMO. It's not a good matching for a fella famous for picking his spots, & throwing one punch at a time. A good, stiff, consistent jab is counted among the best ways to trouble a busy fighter, particularly one fond of getting right into your chest. Hamed didn't have it. It's obvious the guy has the power to discourage Fenech, but not the required intensity. This much, & one thing more --- in out-right terms, Fenech was a much better fighter than Hamed ever was.adamheight wrote:at featherweight?
In short, Australia beats England in sport...againD
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: hamed v fenech
Luckily for me, I don't care at all about Union, Cricket, or Soccer
Big League fan though. Convenient & true
Big League fan though. Convenient & true
Re: hamed v fenech
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Luckily for me, I don't care at all about Union, Cricket, or Soccer![]()
Big League fan though. Convenient & true
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: hamed v fenech
Hey, we're a country of twenty-one million. What's your excuse?
Not that we need one --- I fancy we've won more than lost with the English, over the years
Not that we need one --- I fancy we've won more than lost with the English, over the years
Re: hamed v fenech
Your very good at rugby, cricket and swimming no-one can denyGoodnight, Irene wrote:Hey, we're a country of twenty-one million. What's your excuse?![]()
Not that we need one --- I fancy we've won more than lost with the English, over the years
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: hamed v fenech
That was always the conventional wisdom; that pressure was the key to beating Hamed, yet aggressive fighters were typically who Hamed performed best against. Barrera beat him by suddenly changing his style and taking by surprise a Hamed who'd prepared for a slugger.Goodnight, Irene wrote:
I really think the activity level here absolutely slaughters Hamed.
Re: hamed v fenech
Fenech was the better fighter but Hamed wins.
A pressure fighter is not going to beat a puncher like Hamed.
Hamed got lazy and self-indulgent but he was always an electric puncher.
A pressure fighter is not going to beat a puncher like Hamed.
Hamed got lazy and self-indulgent but he was always an electric puncher.
Re: hamed v fenech
I don't like either of them, but Feneck was an agressive, powerful animal whilest Hamed was a glass chined, cotton woolled, hit and run boxer with no defense but his extraordinary moovement. Fenech by stoppage.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: hamed v fenech
Nobody gets lazy against a prime Jeff Fenech & wins the fight.Ezzard wrote:Fenech was the better fighter but Hamed wins.
A pressure fighter is not going to beat a puncher like Hamed.
Hamed got lazy and self-indulgent but he was always an electric puncher.
Re: hamed v fenech
Fenech stops him late.
Re: hamed v fenech
Livingstone Cole wrote:Glass chinned? His reflexes were his defence, which he payed less attention to later on but as a bantam hitting Hamed was like trying to suck a fly out of the air with a straw.dberry wrote:I don't like either of them, but Feneck was an agressive, powerful animal whilest Hamed was a glass chined, cotton woolled, hit and run boxer with no defense but his extraordinary moovement. Fenech by stoppage.
-
tanibanana
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 126
- Joined: 22 Mar 2009, 03:14
Re: hamed v fenech
Hamed has exceptional defense, problem is, his lazy in covering up his chin. I feel this fight is like a toss coin, either fighter can win.. i'll give a 55/45 odds for this one, in favor of fenech..dberry wrote:I don't like either of them, but Feneck was an agressive, powerful animal whilest Hamed was a glass chined, cotton woolled, hit and run boxer with no defense but his extraordinary moovement. Fenech by stoppage.
Re: hamed v fenech
Honestly guys, I find Hamed tiresome and Fenech a warrior but Hamed was one of the hardest punching FWs ever. Few fighters could have come to him and beaten him.
Re: hamed v fenech
Fenech wins by KO late. I respect Naz' punch but Callejas and Nelson were known for their powerful punches and Fenech walked right through both of them.
Im my opinion Fenech is one of the most toughest, corageous and most mentally strong fighter in the history of the sport.
Im my opinion Fenech is one of the most toughest, corageous and most mentally strong fighter in the history of the sport.
Re: hamed v fenech
WHICH ONE OF THESE GOT STOPPED AGAIN....THATS RIGHT FENECH.....dberry wrote:I don't like either of them, but Feneck was an agressive, powerful animal whilest Hamed was a glass chined, cotton woolled, hit and run boxer with no defense but his extraordinary moovement. Fenech by stoppage.
Re: hamed v fenech
A PEAK HAMED WOULD BEAT FENECH QUITE EASY PICK HIM TO BITS OR KO HIM WITH ONE OF THE COUNTERS
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: hamed v fenech
Fenech was stopped by Nelson. Hamed was a whisker away from being stopped by KelleySOUTHPAW wrote:WHICH ONE OF THESE GOT STOPPED AGAIN....THATS RIGHT FENECH.....dberry wrote:I don't like either of them, but Feneck was an agressive, powerful animal whilest Hamed was a glass chined, cotton woolled, hit and run boxer with no defense but his extraordinary moovement. Fenech by stoppage.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: hamed v fenech
Quite easy? Gimme a break. I'm sure there's not an ounce of nationalism in this post at allSOUTHPAW wrote:A PEAK HAMED WOULD BEAT FENECH QUITE EASY PICK HIM TO BITS OR KO HIM WITH ONE OF THE COUNTERS
Best respective opponents, Fenech dominated Nelson, while Hamed was embarrassed by Barrera.
Re: hamed v fenech
Wich one fought the most credable opponents and held the most recognised titles (WBO & IBO doesn't count baby)......? THATS RIGHT, FENECH.SOUTHPAW wrote:WHICH ONE OF THESE GOT STOPPED AGAIN....THATS RIGHT FENECH.....dberry wrote:I don't like either of them, but Feneck was an agressive, powerful animal whilest Hamed was a glass chined, cotton woolled, hit and run boxer with no defense but his extraordinary moovement. Fenech by stoppage.
Re: hamed v fenech
I still like Hamed by ko. Hamed had big league power and Fenech would walk right into him. I'd root for Fenech all night but I'd put my money on Hamed.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Fenech was stopped by Nelson. Hamed was a whisker away from being stopped by KelleySOUTHPAW wrote:WHICH ONE OF THESE GOT STOPPED AGAIN....THATS RIGHT FENECH.....dberry wrote:I don't like either of them, but Feneck was an agressive, powerful animal whilest Hamed was a glass chined, cotton woolled, hit and run boxer with no defense but his extraordinary moovement. Fenech by stoppage.
(League rules btw)