Ryan Rhodes, David Haye, Frank W

Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Ryan Rhodes, David Haye, Frank W

Post by Poncey »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Poncey wrote:I'll lock the thread if any further non-factual statements are made.
Don't be ridiculous. And I'm more aware of the sensitivities than you are, believe me.

We should be allowed to express an opinion within the limits of the law. If you're going to be effective as a mod here (a very difficult job), you need to to get a grasp of defamation law. I'm not trying to be a twat (I don't need to try, I know :D ) it's just that you're living proof of the 'chilling effect' that certain people have achieved through litigation.

Then again, until you do get a grasp of this (not as difficult as some people think) then a blanket policy is best - though very, very depressing.
My ruling stands Ian. Whether it's right or wrong is not for me to comment.

I have referred it to the Boss. He can over-rule me.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Ryan Rhodes, David Haye, Frank W

Post by dondada »

Poncey wrote: My ruling stands Ian. Whether it's right or wrong is not for me to comment.

I have referred it to the Boss. He can over-rule me.
That's fine, I understand. You must realise, though, how reductive it would be if only 'factual statements' were made on a forum - and this is exactly what certain people want?

I really do understand the practical necessity for the ruling in this case.

You would need a team of lawyers as mods to do it properly...and even then certain parties would still bang in spurious letters.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Ryan Rhodes, David Haye, Frank W

Post by Poncey »

I want to draft some do's and don'ts (sic) for us Mods to know what can and cannot be said. Law has already made great strides getting us all together with the same rules, so it make sense to include this as well.

Especially given the history some people have had on the issue at hand.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Ryan Rhodes, David Haye, Frank W

Post by twenty six »

On a personal note, I'd just like us to move on from this thread.
Quite frankly it's boring !
Deadendgeneration
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1906
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 19:01

Re: Ryan Rhodes, David Haye, Frank W

Post by Deadendgeneration »

twenty six wrote:On a personal note, I'd just like us to move on from this thread.
Quite frankly it's boring !

Good on you mate, you're being pretty big about this.
Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1944
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Ryan Rhodes, David Haye, Frank W

Post by Alba »

twenty six wrote:On a personal note, I'd just like us to move on from this thread.
Quite frankly it's boring !

Good play on words there :OhYes:
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Ryan Rhodes, David Haye, Frank W

Post by leforge »

Ryan says he fight in April. The only free sky date I can see is the 30th hope he does.
daddy-rhino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 145
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 00:36

Re: Ryan Rhodes, David Haye, Frank W

Post by daddy-rhino »

Did he say who he fighting ? :box:
Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1944
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Ryan Rhodes, David Haye, Frank W

Post by Alba »

daddy-rhino wrote:Did he say who he fighting ? :box:

Aye :OhYes:
daddy-rhino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 145
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 00:36

Re: Ryan Rhodes, David Haye, Frank W

Post by daddy-rhino »

Alba wrote:
daddy-rhino wrote:Did he say who he fighting ? :box:

Aye :OhYes:

well lol ~???????????? :confused:
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: Ryan Rhodes, David Haye, Frank W

Post by Finch »

Forgive my ignorance...... but who is twenty six?
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26456
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Ryan Rhodes, David Haye, Frank W

Post by banjo »

Finch wrote:Forgive my ignorance...... but who is twenty six?
Me, I turn 27 in september tho.
Post Reply