Fighting #1 Contenders

Post Reply

Should TJF and Moore only fight #1 contenders?

Yes
4
80%
No
1
20%
 
Total votes: 5

SAV
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1888
Joined: 29 Jun 2002, 01:24

Fighting #1 Contenders

Post by SAV »

we think this may be the best way to keep things fair.
armageto
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5259
Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15

Re: Fighting #1 Contenders

Post by armageto »

You act like Moore doesn't have......6 losses?


I don't know why the hell he is even in this post......
SAV
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1888
Joined: 29 Jun 2002, 01:24

Re: Fighting #1 Contenders

Post by SAV »

armageto wrote:You act like Moore doesn't have......6 losses?


I don't know why the hell he is even in this post......
we're catty today arent we? i didnt mean fair like we're above and beyond everyone else. i meant fair as in there will be no ducking from SAV Promotions.
armageto
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5259
Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15

Re: Fighting #1 Contenders

Post by armageto »

SAV wrote:
armageto wrote:You act like Moore doesn't have......6 losses?


I don't know why the hell he is even in this post......
we're catty today arent we? i didnt mean fair like we're above and beyond everyone else. i meant fair as in there will be no ducking from SAV Promotions.
Sorry, misunderstood.........


I say fight the best you think are out there. Sometimes a fighter can be ranked #1 and not be the best out there. Like when Calzaghe was ranked #1......
SAV
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1888
Joined: 29 Jun 2002, 01:24

Re: Fighting #1 Contenders

Post by SAV »

armageto wrote:
SAV wrote:
armageto wrote:You act like Moore doesn't have......6 losses?


I don't know why the hell he is even in this post......
we're catty today arent we? i didnt mean fair like we're above and beyond everyone else. i meant fair as in there will be no ducking from SAV Promotions.
Sorry, misunderstood.........


I say fight the best you think are out there. Sometimes a fighter can be ranked #1 and not be the best out there. Like when Calzaghe was ranked #1......

:lol: geto doesnt want to name names but....
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Re: Fighting #1 Contenders

Post by Neri »

armageto wrote:
SAV wrote:
armageto wrote:You act like Moore doesn't have......6 losses?


I don't know why the hell he is even in this post......
we're catty today arent we? i didnt mean fair like we're above and beyond everyone else. i meant fair as in there will be no ducking from SAV Promotions.
Sorry, misunderstood.........


I say fight the best you think are out there. Sometimes a fighter can be ranked #1 and not be the best out there. Like when Calzaghe was ranked #1......
All that matters is you being the #1 contender when the mandatory is due. Nobody has ever fought the #1 every week. There are another 9 fighters who are just as deserving in between.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Fighting #1 Contenders

Post by Crease »

Neri wrote: Nobody has ever fought the #1 every week.

It would take a daring champion to consistently fight the no 1 contender consistently....
Neri wrote:
There are another 9 fighters who are just as deserving in between.
With the utmost respect Neri, I disagree... Being the no 1 challenger means you deserve a title shot more than anyone else.

Besides if a champion kept fighting the no 8 and no 9 ranked fighters, he would get scrutiny for taking the "softer" options. :TU:
toppity
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2802
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 22:03

Re: Fighting #1 Contenders

Post by toppity »

yes...but i'm a little biased :D
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Re: Fighting #1 Contenders

Post by Neri »

Crease wrote:
Neri wrote: Nobody has ever fought the #1 every week.

It would take a daring champion to consistently fight the no 1 contender consistently....
Neri wrote:
There are another 9 fighters who are just as deserving in between.
With the utmost respect Neri, I disagree... Being the no 1 challenger means you deserve a title shot more than anyone else.

Besides if a champion kept fighting the no 8 and no 9 ranked fighters, he would get scrutiny for taking the "softer" options. :TU:
But would a mandatory come along sooner or later? Yes. Do fighters fight the #1 fighter every fight? No. That just isn't boxing. When you have a mandatory you face up to it. In the meantime you can face whoever the fornicate you want as long as they are ranked.
sockdolager
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1455
Joined: 17 Jun 2005, 08:57

Re: Fighting #1 Contenders

Post by sockdolager »

No, then I can actually get a shot!
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Fighting #1 Contenders

Post by Adamj1987 »

yes
Post Reply