Fighting #1 Contenders
Fighting #1 Contenders
we think this may be the best way to keep things fair.
Re: Fighting #1 Contenders
You act like Moore doesn't have......6 losses?
I don't know why the hell he is even in this post......
I don't know why the hell he is even in this post......
Re: Fighting #1 Contenders
we're catty today arent we? i didnt mean fair like we're above and beyond everyone else. i meant fair as in there will be no ducking from SAV Promotions.armageto wrote:You act like Moore doesn't have......6 losses?
I don't know why the hell he is even in this post......
Re: Fighting #1 Contenders
Sorry, misunderstood.........SAV wrote:we're catty today arent we? i didnt mean fair like we're above and beyond everyone else. i meant fair as in there will be no ducking from SAV Promotions.armageto wrote:You act like Moore doesn't have......6 losses?
I don't know why the hell he is even in this post......
I say fight the best you think are out there. Sometimes a fighter can be ranked #1 and not be the best out there. Like when Calzaghe was ranked #1......
Re: Fighting #1 Contenders
armageto wrote:Sorry, misunderstood.........SAV wrote:we're catty today arent we? i didnt mean fair like we're above and beyond everyone else. i meant fair as in there will be no ducking from SAV Promotions.armageto wrote:You act like Moore doesn't have......6 losses?
I don't know why the hell he is even in this post......
I say fight the best you think are out there. Sometimes a fighter can be ranked #1 and not be the best out there. Like when Calzaghe was ranked #1......
Re: Fighting #1 Contenders
All that matters is you being the #1 contender when the mandatory is due. Nobody has ever fought the #1 every week. There are another 9 fighters who are just as deserving in between.armageto wrote:Sorry, misunderstood.........SAV wrote:we're catty today arent we? i didnt mean fair like we're above and beyond everyone else. i meant fair as in there will be no ducking from SAV Promotions.armageto wrote:You act like Moore doesn't have......6 losses?
I don't know why the hell he is even in this post......
I say fight the best you think are out there. Sometimes a fighter can be ranked #1 and not be the best out there. Like when Calzaghe was ranked #1......
Re: Fighting #1 Contenders
Neri wrote: Nobody has ever fought the #1 every week.
It would take a daring champion to consistently fight the no 1 contender consistently....
With the utmost respect Neri, I disagree... Being the no 1 challenger means you deserve a title shot more than anyone else.Neri wrote:
There are another 9 fighters who are just as deserving in between.
Besides if a champion kept fighting the no 8 and no 9 ranked fighters, he would get scrutiny for taking the "softer" options.
Re: Fighting #1 Contenders
yes...but i'm a little biased ![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Fighting #1 Contenders
But would a mandatory come along sooner or later? Yes. Do fighters fight the #1 fighter every fight? No. That just isn't boxing. When you have a mandatory you face up to it. In the meantime you can face whoever the fornicate you want as long as they are ranked.Crease wrote:Neri wrote: Nobody has ever fought the #1 every week.
It would take a daring champion to consistently fight the no 1 contender consistently....
With the utmost respect Neri, I disagree... Being the no 1 challenger means you deserve a title shot more than anyone else.Neri wrote:
There are another 9 fighters who are just as deserving in between.
Besides if a champion kept fighting the no 8 and no 9 ranked fighters, he would get scrutiny for taking the "softer" options.
-
sockdolager
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1455
- Joined: 17 Jun 2005, 08:57
Re: Fighting #1 Contenders
No, then I can actually get a shot!