Nel wrote:Someone needs to force Pryce to retire before he gets seriously damaged. He looked awful against Aaron Jones and I mean AWFUL. He looked like a novice. No gameplan nothing.
thats silly im 28 not 38.would of beat arron in a NORMAL,bout.
Nel wrote:Someone needs to force Pryce to retire before he gets seriously damaged. He looked awful against Aaron Jones and I mean AWFUL. He looked like a novice. No gameplan nothing.
sugar sweet wrote:Nel wrote:Someone needs to force Pryce to retire before he gets seriously damaged. He looked awful against Aaron Jones and I mean AWFUL. He looked like a novice. No gameplan nothing.
thats silly im 28 not 38.would of beat arron in a NORMAL,bout.
Yes ok, you carry on riding his cock just because he uses this forum. Results dont lie.DG. wrote:sugar sweet wrote:Nel wrote:Someone needs to force Pryce to retire before he gets seriously damaged. He looked awful against Aaron Jones and I mean AWFUL. He looked like a novice. No gameplan nothing.
thats silly im 28 not 38.would of beat arron in a NORMAL,bout.
Agree, PF is not really for championship level fighters,ignore Nel, she is suffering with morning sickness, she will be fine soon.
PS, forget Middle, Welter is not a bad move at all.
DD
Nel wrote:Yes ok, you carry on riding his cock just because he uses this forum. Results dont lie.DG. wrote:sugar sweet wrote:
thats silly im 28 not 38.would of beat arron in a NORMAL,bout.
Agree, PF is not really for championship level fighters,ignore Nel, she is suffering with morning sickness, she will be fine soon.
PS, forget Middle, Welter is not a bad move at all.
DD
i knew prizefighter was massive gamble.i think il be at my peak now for 10-12 rounders,so case of fresh start,i only entered prizefighter as no other fights on table.il be moving down to welterweight and hope to get a fight in april-may.day of prizefighter i only went up to 11st 5,well the others prob scaled over 12st.so 10st 7 seems the right move.tonyevs wrote:I think most people had correctly said that the prizefighter format wouldn`t suit Bradley. I`d also said he would sacrifice his name on the tournament.
How somebody can critisize Bradley for not having a gameplan... it was over 3rnds
.. there is no time for a gameplan ffs
![]()
Some guys the format suits .. Gavin Reese was a prime example![]()
Some guys it will not .. Bradley Pryce![]()
L-Middle always seemed a un-natural weight for Pryce to fight at. He did well to do so well there. A drop to welter I think is a good idea. The extra work he will have to do to get down to it will only improve what he already has .. as long as he does the weight properly of course.
Hi Bradley, nice to see you on here...sugar sweet wrote:i knew prizefighter was massive gamble.i think il be at my peak now for 10-12 rounders,so case of fresh start,i only entered prizefighter as no other fights on table.il be moving down to welterweight and hope to get a fight in april-may.day of prizefighter i only went up to 11st 5,well the others prob scaled over 12st.so 10st 7 seems the right move.tonyevs wrote:I think most people had correctly said that the prizefighter format wouldn`t suit Bradley. I`d also said he would sacrifice his name on the tournament.
How somebody can critisize Bradley for not having a gameplan... it was over 3rnds
.. there is no time for a gameplan ffs
![]()
Some guys the format suits .. Gavin Reese was a prime example![]()
Some guys it will not .. Bradley Pryce![]()
L-Middle always seemed a un-natural weight for Pryce to fight at. He did well to do so well there. A drop to welter I think is a good idea. The extra work he will have to do to get down to it will only improve what he already has .. as long as he does the weight properly of course.
rhino222 wrote:Hi Bradley, nice to see you on here...sugar sweet wrote:i knew prizefighter was massive gamble.i think il be at my peak now for 10-12 rounders,so case of fresh start,i only entered prizefighter as no other fights on table.il be moving down to welterweight and hope to get a fight in april-may.day of prizefighter i only went up to 11st 5,well the others prob scaled over 12st.so 10st 7 seems the right move.tonyevs wrote:I think most people had correctly said that the prizefighter format wouldn`t suit Bradley. I`d also said he would sacrifice his name on the tournament.
How somebody can critisize Bradley for not having a gameplan... it was over 3rnds
.. there is no time for a gameplan ffs
![]()
Some guys the format suits .. Gavin Reese was a prime example![]()
Some guys it will not .. Bradley Pryce![]()
L-Middle always seemed a un-natural weight for Pryce to fight at. He did well to do so well there. A drop to welter I think is a good idea. The extra work he will have to do to get down to it will only improve what he already has .. as long as he does the weight properly of course.
im not here to kiss arse but i was ringside for the last Prizefighter night. i have posted on here for a long time and had read (your own words) that you were ready for the prizefighter series and people would be surprised........... well...........?
i was certainly very surprised, i had you as my pre tournament favourite, i thought that anyone who had stopped small would have far too much for any of the other competitors, providing you could get past sinclairs bombs in the first bout.
your fight with sinclair was very close from ringside, personally i think you were lucky to get the 'nod' but having asked people who saw the fight on tv said it was a fair decision, so fair do's to you.
your fight against prince aaron was, from your perspective, appalling, im not sure if you entered the ring too cocky or thought you could just 'bomb him out' as he had been stopped a couple of times before. It does not take a rocket scientist to work out that a long rangy fighter with an excellent jab needs to be boxed at close range, ducking under his left lead and then working him in close then getting out of there again. what went wrong bradley? you were eating his jab for the whole fight and only seemed to land a handfull of shots in the 9 minutes and your head movement was minimal to say the least. i was very disappointed because, as i said, i had you as the pre-tourny favourite.
so where do you go from here? you looked a bit 'soft' at light middle so welter would suit you better i think, you have been in a lot of wars and taken a lot of shots over the years, you may be 28 but you have a lot of miles on the clock mate. personally, id like to see you wind back the years and go and get in with small again, if you can beat him again you are suddenly right up there, but im not sure small will be too interested, too much of a gamble for him i think, but, after your PF performance mr small might feel that it will be an easy nights work for him.
how do you feel is your best route back? do you want small again, or are you only 2 defeats away from retirement? . id love to hear your opinions mate.
LOL!sugar sweet wrote:rhino222 wrote:Hi Bradley, nice to see you on here...sugar sweet wrote: i knew prizefighter was massive gamble.i think il be at my peak now for 10-12 rounders,so case of fresh start,i only entered prizefighter as no other fights on table.il be moving down to welterweight and hope to get a fight in april-may.day of prizefighter i only went up to 11st 5,well the others prob scaled over 12st.so 10st 7 seems the right move.
im not here to kiss arse but i was ringside for the last Prizefighter night. i have posted on here for a long time and had read (your own words) that you were ready for the prizefighter series and people would be surprised........... well...........?
i was certainly very surprised, i had you as my pre tournament favourite, i thought that anyone who had stopped small would have far too much for any of the other competitors, providing you could get past sinclairs bombs in the first bout.
your fight with sinclair was very close from ringside, personally i think you were lucky to get the 'nod' but having asked people who saw the fight on tv said it was a fair decision, so fair do's to you.
your fight against prince aaron was, from your perspective, appalling, im not sure if you entered the ring too cocky or thought you could just 'bomb him out' as he had been stopped a couple of times before. It does not take a rocket scientist to work out that a long rangy fighter with an excellent jab needs to be boxed at close range, ducking under his left lead and then working him in close then getting out of there again. what went wrong bradley? you were eating his jab for the whole fight and only seemed to land a handfull of shots in the 9 minutes and your head movement was minimal to say the least. i was very disappointed because, as i said, i had you as the pre-tourny favourite.
so where do you go from here? you looked a bit 'soft' at light middle so welter would suit you better i think, you have been in a lot of wars and taken a lot of shots over the years, you may be 28 but you have a lot of miles on the clock mate. personally, id like to see you wind back the years and go and get in with small again, if you can beat him again you are suddenly right up there, but im not sure small will be too interested, too much of a gamble for him i think, but, after your PF performance mr small might feel that it will be an easy nights work for him.
how do you feel is your best route back? do you want small again, or are you only 2 defeats away from retirement? . id love to hear your opinions mate.
Prizefighter was not for me,its a lottery,im not a 3 round fighter,and couldnt adjust to it,i did take arron lightly and thought it would be over quick,but he had what i didnt,a game plan.if i boxed him over 10-12 i would start the same,i know i give most of early rounds away,but i would of slowed him down by halfway and stop him,i still think 2010 will see the best of me in long distance fight.im 28 and prob at my best,and look forward to showing it next fight,1st few things to sort out,things i cant discuss trainer-manager-promoter etc.a move down to welter may happen unless i get fight with 1 of top 4.small would be my best way back to a title.i think 1 win will put me as no1 challenger for british so thats a option.last thing me favorite to win prizefighter no chance.a marathon man doing a 100meter sprint,not realistic.all i can say is 2010 will decide my future,dont write me off yet,i always knew i wouldnt mature into a boxer til my late 20s-30s.2010 will be SUGARS time.
tonyevs wrote:Bradley - prob hard or awkward for you to answer. But - do you see the Calzaghe connection hurting your career?
Enzo doesn`t have the connections to get you the oppurtunities. And to be honest, a boxers career can be a very short one. Certainly shorter than a trainers![]()
If I were you I would definetly move down to welter - and also take a move away from the Calzaghes. If Enzo has your best interests at heart, then he would understand.
sugar sweet wrote:tonyevs wrote:Bradley - prob hard or awkward for you to answer. But - do you see the Calzaghe connection hurting your career?
Enzo doesn`t have the connections to get you the oppurtunities. And to be honest, a boxers career can be a very short one. Certainly shorter than a trainers![]()
If I were you I would definetly move down to welter - and also take a move away from the Calzaghes. If Enzo has your best interests at heart, then he would understand.
iv now parted company with enzo,and will now find new trainer,also i will be moving down to welter.tony doherty,hari miles,gavin rees also parted company.
but without a stable of fighters to make a few quid off, how is he going to keep paying for all that hair dye? maybe if he didn't get half of it down his neck he would save a bit for his tash!!!boxingchat wrote:It seems that now Joe has packed it in Enzo has neglected his stable, because he might have to spend a penny. Look how Cleverley has gone on leaps and bounds and making good money no doubt as a triple champion since he left. Enzo just used the fighters as unpaid punchbags for Joe. It may be too late for Bradley and Gavin but at least they've finally seen Enzo for the phoney he is.
whats that got to do with a dodgy barnet?!!!MachoMan09 wrote:Maybe he wouldn't have to worry about that quite as much if Joe had been paid what he was owed by the promotional outfit that sadly went bang before it coughed up?Samuel Brooks wrote:but without a stable of fighters to make a few quid off, how is he going to keep paying for all that hair dye? maybe if he didn't get half of it down his neck he would save a bit for his tash!!!boxingchat wrote:It seems that now Joe has packed it in Enzo has neglected his stable, because he might have to spend a penny. Look how Cleverley has gone on leaps and bounds and making good money no doubt as a triple champion since he left. Enzo just used the fighters as unpaid punchbags for Joe. It may be too late for Bradley and Gavin but at least they've finally seen Enzo for the phoney he is.
MachoMan09 wrote:Maybe he wouldn't have to worry about that quite as much if Joe had been paid what he was owed by the promotional outfit that sadly went bang before it coughed up?Samuel Brooks wrote:but without a stable of fighters to make a few quid off, how is he going to keep paying for all that hair dye? maybe if he didn't get half of it down his neck he would save a bit for his tash!!!boxingchat wrote:It seems that now Joe has packed it in Enzo has neglected his stable, because he might have to spend a penny. Look how Cleverley has gone on leaps and bounds and making good money no doubt as a triple champion since he left. Enzo just used the fighters as unpaid punchbags for Joe. It may be too late for Bradley and Gavin but at least they've finally seen Enzo for the phoney he is.