On both times, my boxers got a raw deal... On both occasions they have more than a valid claim to victory.
On week 24, Carl Froch lost by TUD to Billy Conn.
After 8 rounds of boxing, Billy Conn was unable to continue fighting due to cuts...
On the scorecards Conn was ahead, but he could not fight any longer, Froch should have been awarded the fight, he was willing and able to keep the fight going, Conn wasn't.
How was Conn awarded the victory if he couldn't continue?
***
Also on week 24, Jose Torres draw with John Conteh.
The fight only lasted 2 rounds... Torres convincingly won the 1st round...By a big margin I might add.
In the second round, Conteh was unable to continue the fight...
And Torres was ahead on the judges scorecards...
Everything points to a Torres victory, yet the referree awarded the fight as a stalemate.
I really do not get the rules... It seems that rules are being modified to rob my boxers of warranted victories.
Commish?