Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post Reply
scrap iron
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 407
Joined: 02 Jan 2007, 17:38

Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by scrap iron »

I notice this has now been pulled from the boxrec schedule, it would have been nice to know why this fight is no longer happening by the promoter. :witzend:
MacTavish
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 961
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 11:03

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by MacTavish »

no venue was ever announced, tickets sold - don't think it was ever on tbh. :shame:
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5844
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by tonyevs »

MachoMan09 wrote:How long does Fury have left on his contract with Mick Hennessy? If he sticks with Brian Hughes, I can see him becoming a FW fighter.
watching what little the title did for witter & froch you couldn't blame tyson if he weighed his options up a bit..
Then again...would frank want him? McDermott exposed Tyson somewhat before...
jonp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2081
Joined: 29 Mar 2007, 12:44

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by jonp »

MachoMan09 wrote:How long does Fury have left on his contract with Mick Hennessy? If he sticks with Brian Hughes, I can see him becoming a FW fighter.
Hughes newer prospects ala Quigg,Roberts,barker and Askin are with hatton so cant see that.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by THEBUTCH »

Fury would have to be stir crazy to go with SN :shame: . Warren's track record with heavyweights is laughable. :lol:
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by Asterix »

This news is no surprise. Quite a few people have said they can't see Fury taking it at the moment. It'll be interesting to see what Fury does now. His activity has really slowed and his last two opponents were terrible.
wrimc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 680
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 14:36

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by wrimc »

Fury's activity hasn't ddropped off Hennessey's have with no tv deal he is left in the lurch the only thing keeping him going is Carl in the super 6 if he fails to progress from the group stages Hennessey is in real trouble no tv deal no money coming in and prospects like Murray Barker and Fury who should all be pushing on for titles of osme sort will get picked up by Hearn and Hatton. Witter would leave but he isnt going to go with the Hattons anytime soon and Warren won't take him back so he really has nowhere to go. Once Barker or Murray leaves there will be an exodus. If Carl retires in the next few years hennessey will have nobody left because he has been left in the lurch with no tv deal and no way of staging shows or paying fighters. If he was clever he would have got this on the undercard in Denamrk of Kessler Froch
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by Asterix »

wrimc wrote:Fury's activity hasn't ddropped off Hennessey's have with no tv deal he is left in the lurch the only thing keeping him going is Carl in the super 6 if he fails to progress from the group stages Hennessey is in real trouble no tv deal no money coming in and prospects like Murray Barker and Fury who should all be pushing on for titles of osme sort will get picked up by Hearn and Hatton. Witter would leave but he isnt going to go with the Hattons anytime soon and Warren won't take him back so he really has nowhere to go. Once Barker or Murray leaves there will be an exodus. If Carl retires in the next few years hennessey will have nobody left because he has been left in the lurch with no tv deal and no way of staging shows or paying fighters. If he was clever he would have got this on the undercard in Denamrk of Kessler Froch
Activity as in how often he fights, not his work rate.
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by Captain Hook »

Fury could go with Hatton?
housesecond
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 474
Joined: 16 Nov 2008, 10:00

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by housesecond »

MachoMan09 wrote:How long does Fury have left on his contract with Mick Hennessy? If he sticks with Brian Hughes, I can see him becoming a FW fighter.
If he does he'll never fight Mcdermott
Cotto16
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 354
Joined: 03 Dec 2007, 00:17

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by Cotto16 »

WTF......Was looking foward to this. :witzend:
Bomber 1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1697
Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 09:44

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by Bomber 1 »

MacTavish wrote:no venue was ever announced, tickets sold - don't think it was ever on tbh. :shame:

Spot on!!! :TU:
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by twenty six »

Brian Hughes / allegedly.
Think that's a long shot tbh.
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by funso banjo baby »

its over the Fury bandwagon


move on, people.
IRLangmaid25
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3316
Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by IRLangmaid25 »

He can't have sustained another injury prior to the fight he had to reliquinish the belt because he has been plagued with hand and back injuries since he joined the paid ranks has he? But as for activity since December 2008 he has 10 fights in 17 months which is quite busy in my book despite the fact he has had problems getting good quality sparing here in the UK because of his reputation and the problems he has had his hand and back.

I too was looking forward as well I thought the purse bids etc and have gone through and I think he would have won it as he would have had the fantastic incentive of being number 1 for the British title which has been one of his ambitions. But I am still looking forward to seeing return to the ring whenever that maybe.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by Asterix »

IRLangmaid25 wrote:He can't have sustained another injury prior to the fight he had to reliquinish the belt because he has been plagued with hand and back injuries since he joined the paid ranks has he? But as for activity since December 2008 he has 10 fights in 17 months which is quite busy in my book despite the fact he has had problems getting good quality sparing here in the UK because of his reputation and the problems he has had his hand and back.
His activity was excellent.

A fight a month from Dec-08 to May-09
A fight every 2 months from May-09 to Sep-09
1 fight since September 2009! That's 1 fight in around 7 months.
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by sweetscience »

funso banjo baby wrote:its over the Fury bandwagon
nail... head !
WildWaylon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3223
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by WildWaylon »

I thought this fight had to happen whether Fury wanted it or not. I just dont understand what is going on. Anyway I dont think Fury is going anywhere. You need to beat people like McD with ease if you want a World title. Fury lost the fight but got the win with a contraversial decision by the ref.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by gobbles »

MachoMan09 wrote:
THEBUTCH wrote:Fury would have to be stir crazy to go with SN :shame: . Warren's track record with heavyweights is laughable. :lol:
He did alright for Frank Bruno.

He's done alright for Danny Williams over the years.

He made a silk purse out of a sow's ear with Skelton.

etc...

You can only work with what there is available. It's not his fault our heavies have been a bit gash over the years.

Alright he missed out on Lennox

He got Matt Skelton a world title shot!!
WildWaylon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3223
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by WildWaylon »

gobbles wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote:
THEBUTCH wrote:Fury would have to be stir crazy to go with SN :shame: . Warren's track record with heavyweights is laughable. :lol:
He did alright for Frank Bruno.

He's done alright for Danny Williams over the years.

He made a silk purse out of a sow's ear with Skelton.

etc...

You can only work with what there is available. It's not his fault our heavies have been a bit gash over the years.

Alright he missed out on Lennox

He got Matt Skelton a world title shot!!
And he put up with Danny Williams and Audley Harrison giving them chance after chance. At least big Matt fought his heart out.
Jesus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 340
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 15:00

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by Jesus »

gobbles wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote:
THEBUTCH wrote:Fury would have to be stir crazy to go with SN :shame: . Warren's track record with heavyweights is laughable. :lol:
He did alright for Frank Bruno.

He's done alright for Danny Williams over the years.

He made a silk purse out of a sow's ear with Skelton.

etc...

You can only work with what there is available. It's not his fault our heavies have been a bit gash over the years.

Alright he missed out on Lennox
.

He got Matt Skelton a world title shot!!
sorry to sound stupid but who did skelton fight for a world title as i really dont remember it? please dont tell me vitali! im kind of thinking chagaev or someone along them lines..
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by Asterix »

Yes, it was Chagaev. :TU:

You can always look these things up if you're unsure: http://boxrec.com/
Jesus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 340
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 15:00

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by Jesus »

Asterix wrote:Yes, it was Chagaev. :TU:

You can always look these things up if you're unsure: http://boxrec.com/

sorry to sound stupid again but what section do i go to?
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by Asterix »

Jesus wrote:
Asterix wrote:Yes, it was Chagaev. :TU:

You can always look these things up if you're unsure: http://boxrec.com/

sorry to sound stupid again but what section do i go to?
You could go to 'name' and do a search from there: http://boxrec.com/search.php
or
you could click on the heavyweight category (see below) and change the form options accordingly
Image
or
you could click on 'ratings' and go from there: http://boxrec.com/ratings.php

If I were you'd I'd have a browse around the site and get acquainted. You can find some cool things.

If you're looking for a particular boxer, the simplest thing is to type their name plus 'boxrec' into Google.

e.g. http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&source=h ... 06d40aec82 (first link)
Jesus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 340
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 15:00

Re: Tyson Fury v John McDermott 22 May is off

Post by Jesus »

Asterix wrote:
Jesus wrote:
Asterix wrote:Yes, it was Chagaev. :TU:

You can always look these things up if you're unsure: http://boxrec.com/

sorry to sound stupid again but what section do i go to?
You could go to 'name' and do a search from there: http://boxrec.com/search.php
or
you could click on the heavyweight category (see below) and change the form options accordingly
Image
or
you could click on 'ratings' and go from there: http://boxrec.com/ratings.php

If I were you'd I'd have a browse around the site and get acquainted. You can find some cool things.

If you're looking for a particular boxer, the simplest thing is to type their name plus 'boxrec' into Google.

e.g. http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&source=h ... 06d40aec82 (first link)
thanks man i appreciate im gonna go have a little browse now lol
Post Reply